Jump to content
  • entries
    644
  • comments
    1,625
  • views
    387,460

RS Ophiuchi Nova!


Stellar explosion revealed in unique detail

 

David Shiga for NewScientist.com news service

July 19, 2006

Source Link

 

dn9585-1_675.jpg

The material collected from the red giant leads to a nuclear explosion on the surface of its companion, a white dwarf star (Artist's impression: David A Hardy/PPARC)

____________________________________________________________________

An unprecedented glimpse of the blast wave from an erupting star has been seen by astronomers.

 

The new view suggests the binary system observed could be responsible for some of the universe's most powerful explosions, called Type Ia supernovae. These are very important to astronomers as they are used as "standard candles" to measure distances, but their source has been a major mystery in astronomy.

 

The explosion occurred in a binary star system called RS Ophiuchi. It consists of a red giant star orbited by the dense core of a burned-out star, called a white dwarf. The outbursts occur because the white dwarf slowly collects gas shed by the red giant. When enough gas piles up on the white dwarf, the mounting pressure triggers a tremendous nuclear explosion.

 

RS Ophiuchi explodes this way every few decades, but not with a regular schedule. Before the latest outburst, it had not exploded since 1985. Astronomers were therefore excited to discover a new explosion in progress on 12 February 2006. They were able to track the blast wave's progress sooner after its onset and in more detail than ever before.

 

"We really saw much, much more this time," says Jennifer Sokoloski of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, in Cambridge, US. Sokoloski led a team that observed the event with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), starting the day after the initial detection of the outburst.

 

Flickering candles

The researchers found evidence that the system was on its way to producing a Type Ia supernova. Although these are used as standard candles, there are in fact slight differences in their brightness. This adds uncertainty to distance measurements.

 

Part of the problem is that astronomers do not know for sure what causes the supernovae. Evidence strongly suggests that they occur when a white dwarf collects too much mass, triggering a nuclear explosion that completely destroys the white dwarf.

 

Although astronomers have seen many systems where a white dwarf is collecting matter, none seemed to have the right conditions to lead to a Type Ia supernova. For example, some white dwarfs are collecting matter at too low a rate to get to the critical mass in the universe's lifetime.

 

The properties of the shock wave observed around RS Ophiuchi allowed Sokoloski's team to calculate the mass of the white dwarf that produced it. They determined it is very close to the critical mass that would trigger a supernova.

 

That led them to suggest that systems like RS Ophiuchi, called recurrent novae, account for at least some of the Type Ia supernovae. If true, this would help solve the mystery of their origin and could help refine the distance scale they underpin. "It would be very nice to explain why there is this slight variation in supernova brightness," Sokoloski told New Scientist.

 

Lack of hydrogen

But there is a problem with this idea, argues Sumner Starrfield of Arizona State University in Tempe, US, who is also studying RS Ophiuchi's recent outburst. Type Ia supernovae are distinguished by a lack of hydrogen in their blast waves, he says, and the red giant in the RS Ophiuchi system has shed a lot of hydrogen into the surrounding area. "I think it will explode as a supernova but it's not going to be a Type Ia," Sumner told New Scientist.

 

Sokoloski argues that the white dwarf's recurrent outbursts have probably removed the hydrogen from the immediate vicinity, so that it would not appear in a future Type Ia blast wave.

 

A second study released on Wednesday shows that the material from the explosion seen in February was probably spewed out in jets rather than equally in all directions. Tim O'Brien of the Jodrell Bank Observatory in Macclesfield, UK, led the study. It was based on radio data from the UK's Multi-Element Radio Linked Interferometer Network (MERLIN) and the European VLBI Network (EVN).

 

"It's a jet-like explosion, probably shaped by the geometry of the binary-star system at the centre," says O'Brien.

 

"This suggests that there is much more going on than we believed," says Sumner. He added that it will probably take years to figure all out the implications of the new information.

 

Journal reference: Nature (vol 442, p 276, 279)

__________________________________________________________________

 

Mystery of Explosive Star Solved

Ken Thar for space.com

July 19, 2006

Source Link

 

 

In February, a faint star a few thousand light-years away flared suddenly, beaming so brightly that for a few days it was visible to the naked eye.

 

The star is a stellar corpse the size of Earth, known as a white dwarf, and it is paired in a binary system with a red giant, a dying, bloated star that once resembled our Sun. The red giant has been dumping gas onto the surface of the white dwarf, and every few years, enough matter accumulates to set off a giant thermonuclear explosion.

 

It was one of these explosions, called a "nova," that astronomers and stargazers detected earlier this year.

 

The two-star system, called RS Ophiuchi, is known as a recurrent nova because five similar eruptions have been detected before. The first observation occurred in 1898; the last eruption prior to this latest one happened in 1985.

 

The new observations, made using advanced radio and X-ray telescopes not available during the last outburst, reveal the explosion to be more complex than was previously assumed.

 

Standard computer models had predicted a spherical explosion with matter ejected in all directions equally. The latest observations instead showed that the explosion evolved into two lobes, confirming suspicions that the nova outburst produces twin jets of stellar material that spews out from the white dwarf in opposite directions.

 

"The radio images represent the first time we've ever seen the birth of a jet in a white dwarf system. We literally see the jet 'turn on,'" said Michael Rupen, an astronomer at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory who studied RS Ophiuchi using the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA).

 

As impressive as the nova are, they might just be precursors for a more violent supernova explosion that will occur in the future, scientists say.

 

 

Like the Sun, Only More Powerful

 

The white dwarf's thermonuclear blasts are similar to those that occur on the surface of the sun, but they can be over 100,000 times more powerful. During each outburst, an amount of gas equal to the mass of the Earth is flung into space. Some of this ejected matter slams into the extended atmosphere of the inflated red giant, creating blast waves that accelerate electrons to nearly the speed of light. As the electrons travel through the stars' magnetic fields, they emit radio waves that can be detected by telescopes on Earth.

 

The blast waves move at over four million miles (about 6.4 million km) per hour. For a few weeks during each outburst, the white dwarf becomes a red giant.

 

"After the [thermonuclear explosion], the white dwarf will puff up into a red giant for a few weeks as the hydrogen that has been blasted into space fuses into helium," explains Richard Barry of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.

 

 

All eyes on Ophiuchi

 

Japanese astronomers first detected signs of RS Ophiuchi's latest nova on the night of Feb. 12. Follow-up observations by radio telescopes revealed an expanding blast wave whose diameter was already the size of Saturn's orbit around the Sun.

 

In the weeks following, several radio and X-ray telescopes around the world tracked RS Ophiuchi closely, including the MERLIN array in the UK, the European EVN array, the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) and Very Large Array (VLA) in the United States, and NASA's Swift and Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer satellites.

 

Findings from the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer and the VLBA/EVN observations are detailed in two separate studies published in the July 20 issue of the journal Nature.

 

The red giant and white dwarf stars making up RS Ophiuchi are separated by about 1.5 astronomical units, or one and a half times the distance the Earth is from the sun. The binary star system is located in the constellation Ophiuchus, about 5,000 light-years away

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

C James

Posted

OK, I'm a compulsive nit-picker, so I can't let this one (by the original article's writer) pass.

 

The new view suggests the binary system observed could be responsible for some of the universe's most powerful explosions, called Type Ia supernovae. These are very important to astronomers as they are used as "standard candles" to measure distances, but their source has been a major mystery in astronomy.

 

"some"!?!?!?!?

That's an impossible statement. A Type 1a supernova would, by definition, destroy the white dwarf that is causing the repeated explosions, ending the sequence. Thus, a type 1a supernova cannot be a recurrent phenomenon, as is implied above. The recurrent Novas being seen are definitely not supernovas.

 

Incidentally, to give some reference for the scale of power involved in a type 1 supernova, a paperclip, converted entirely to energy (E=MC^2) would yield about 20 kilotons (the size of the nuclear bomb dropped on Nagasaki). To get an idea of the scale of a type1 supernova, a good way is to estimate the amount of mass that is actually converted to energy. The mass is quite a bit larger than a paperclip: It's about ten times the mass of everything in Earth's solar system other than the sun. That's one very big bang.

 

James, thanks for the articles! Even though I couldn't resist the urge to nit-pick, I really enjoyed them.

JamesSavik

Posted

There are two types of supernova: Type I and Type II. Then there are numerous sub-species which are spectroscopic variations on those two themes.

 

Type I supernova are always white dwarf stars that have grown beyond the Chandrasekhar limit- the maximum mass possible for a white dwarf. When a white dwarf accumulates mass in excess of between 1.2 to 1.4 solar masses[there is some debate on this exact number]. Matter in the state of a white dwarf at that density and pressure becomes unstable and explodes.

 

Type II supernova are very different. This event marks the end point of a massive stars evolution. Giant stars operate like huge reactors. Because of their size and mass, the gravitational pressure of the star on it's core is huge. Under these conditions, the fusion reactions proceed at a furious rate. Such stars are very short-lived. It only takes 10-40 Myrs for one of these giants to burn through their core fuel. First hydrogen is fused into helium, and in successive phases the stars core fuel will be built up- oxygen, nitrogen then carbon. When the core has become Iron, that's when trouble begins. The energy of an Iron fusion reaction is insufficient to keep the star in hydrostatic equilibrium and the star's core collapses. The explosion part of a type II is the rebound from its core.

 

Type II SN are quite rare and are usually seen at extra-galactic distances. In 1987, a SN occurred in the LMC, some 150,000 lyrs away, which is a mere drop in the bucket by cosmic standards. It gave us our first opportunity to study one of these events relatively "close up" with modern instruments.

 

Supernovas play a very important role in stellar evolution. They are the furnace in which all elements heavier than iron are formed. They enrich the interstellar medium with important elements like Nitrogen, Oxygen, Carbon, Silicon, etc. Their massive shock waves are known to trigger star formation by compressing nebular gas which leads gas clouds to collapse under their own gravity.

 

I've studied SN 1987A since it occurred and continue to follow its progress. It created a millisecond pulsar and its ejected shell continues to expand. I have some 80 books and hundreds of papers on the topic.

 

The LMC and SMC are important objects of study: as small galaxies interacting with one another and the Milky Way, as a stellar nursery and laboratory to study the life cycle of stars. They are only observable by ground based observers in the southern hemisphere. My idea of heaven would to be to retire to Australia and study the Magellanic Clouds.

 

phot-13b-06-preview.jpg

This is the Tarantula Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud. It is a region of prolific star formation and is quite beautiful. Notice the hot, young blue and white stars in contrast it with the older red giant.

C James

Posted

There are two types of supernova: Type I and Type II. Then there are numerous sub-species which are spectroscopic variations on those two themes.

 

Type I supernova are always white dwarf stars that have grown beyond the Chandrasekhar limit- the maximum mass possible for a white dwarf. When a white dwarf accumulates mass in excess of between 1.2 to 1.4 solar masses[there is some debate on this exact number]. Matter in the state of a white dwarf at that density and pressure becomes unstable and explodes.

 

Type 1a supernova are indeed always white dwarf stars, with a binary companion from which they acquire mass, until they exceed the Chanrasekar limit.

 

Interestingly, Type 1b and type 1c supernova are not, they are actually type II (core collapse) variants. The reason for this weird classification system, as far I as know, is that the classification system is based on spectral absorption lines (indicating concentrations, or lack thereof, of certain elements) and pre-dates the understanding of the mechanisms of the supernova types.

 

Type II supernova are very different. This event marks the end point of a massive stars evolution. Giant stars operate like huge reactors. Because of their size and mass, the gravitational pressure of the star on it's core is huge. Under these conditions, the fusion reactions proceed at a furious rate. Such stars are very short-lived. It only takes 10-40 Myrs for one of these giants to burn through their core fuel. First hydrogen is fused into helium, and in successive phases the stars core fuel will be built up- oxygen, nitrogen then carbon. When the core has become Iron, that's when trouble begins. The energy of an Iron fusion reaction is insufficient to keep the star in hydrostatic equilibrium and the star's core collapses. The explosion part of a type II is the rebound from its core.

 

Iron fusion would indeed be insufficient, as it uses more energy than it produces. If my (often faulty) memory serves, once a core becomes hot and dense enough for widespread iron fusion to occur, it sets of an accelerating cycle: the net loss of energy further decreases the equilibrium, allowing further contraction to occur. The contraction increases the temperature, causing more iron fusion and more energy loss, resulting in an ever accelerating rate of contraction. According to one theory (one I am fond of) once the inner core reaches the Chandraskar limit, it suddenly collapses, within seconds, dragging the surrounding core material with it. Once the neutron degeneracy limit is reached, it stops, and the rebounding material blows the outer layers of the star apart. Some energy would be derived from the sudden density wave causing a surge in fusion, but most of it would be from the rebound effect.

 

I've studied SN 1987A since it occurred and continue to follow its progress. It created a millisecond pulsar and its ejected shell continues to expand. I have some 80 books and hundreds of papers on the topic.

 

I envy you your book collection!!

 

I hope we don't get a chance to see a supernova at a much closer range. Anything under 1000 light years might not be pleasant. There is a type 1a candidate in HR 8210, about 140 light years out. I can't think of any other close candidates offhand.

 

I hope you do get to retire to Australia and study the stars. There more than a few homes in my area (high mountains of Northern Arizona) that have telescope domes on them, as the night skys here are good for skywatching. I've been tying, unsuccessfully, to get to know a few armature astronomoers so I can have a look myself, but no luck so far.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...