lustful_orcs

An Orc is unable to resist his obsession to always up things just one more notch to the danger side, but with a human stable-man he seems to have taken it all one step too far. If you’re destined to be the last notch to the wrong side, who’ll be the first notch on the right side of things? *discipline, harsh scenes, sexually explicit, Orc x Human pairing*

FIRST NOTCH RIGHT an Orc yaoi story by Lustful_Orcs XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX DESCRIPTION: An Orc is unable to resist his obsession to always up things just one more notch to the danger side, but in a human stable-man he seems to have taken it all one step too far. If you’re destined to be the last notch to the wrong side, who’ll be the first notch on the right side of things? *contains spanking, harsh scenes, sexually explicit, Orc x Human pairing* DISCLAIMER: This stor

An Isengard Uruk-hai known as the Chosen One who had lived the good life finds himself and his true nature on the battlefield, discovering he was Chosen to fulfil his Destiny before he ever had a say in it. *intense mature topics *

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX REFLECTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF DARKNESS An Adult LOTR Uruk-hai story by Lustful_Orcs XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX DESCRIPTION: An Isengard Uruk-hai known as the Chosen One who had lived the good life finds himself and his true nature on the battlefield, discovering he was Chosen to fulfil his Destiny before he ever had a say in it. *intense topics – abysmal sadness – violent death* WARNING: This story is quite explicit an

Respect. 25 years, 25 million dead. A horrible statistic but so terribly much more than a mere number. I think all of us, save from some young'uns, know people who contracted or even died by "the big disease with a little name". And to think that in some regions of africa, already hit hardest by poverty, famine and war, one in six people is HIV infected. Please, all consider becoming a regular benefactor of an AIDS fund, even if just for a few dollars a month.

It really can and doers happen. At age 30 I was struck down by a heart attack. One minute you wake up with what seems a stomach upset, the next you're on the ICU hooked up to a cardiac monitor that keeps wailing on and off throughout a long long night. I learned to live with the reality that due to my condition I may at any time be struck down, from the cardiac thump in the chest to the unconscious thump on the floor, down and out in 15 seconds. We should all take precautions, bad things do happen out of the blue.

*takes a deep breath and starts singing Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika until the neighbors call to STFU* No seriously, that is great, great news, a giant leap forward in the struggle for rights or even acknowledgement of homosexuality in Africa, thanks to aforementioned Christian churches the most homophobic continent of the world. I hope it will be a first step towards Africans coming to terms with the role of homosexuality in their rich heritage of cultures.

Unfortunately that all too often is true. But I do see the trend of Christianity slowly moving towards leaving intolerance behind. If I "slowly move towards" getting you a cup of coffee, feel free to shoo me to the kitchen. The same should happen to Christianity: they should get out of their comfy chair and back into the kitchen of Faith.

Great article and it is good to see a minister approaches Leviticus and church dogma with honesty. Too bad it is one lonely spark of light in the vast darkness that is clergy dogmatics. I am not a Christian, but I respect Christianity, as well as religion itself whatever the denomination. I believe that homosexuality for a significant part is inborn, and this is good news, as it is part of your nature as well as nurture. In my view, homosexuals have an auxiliary function to the human species. When parents die, homosexuals present childless couples to adopt the children and in a world without taboo on homosexcuality, such as primitive cultures, homosexuals act as a social intermediary, tending towards sensitivity and empathy. Homosexuality is not a genetic defect - it is Nature's answer to enrich certain species beyond the standard procreative couple. Homosexuals are just as essential to the human species as heterosexuals. It's always good measure to include the news article in the thread discussing it, for archiving purposes. Here it is! ________________________________________________ When religion loses its credibility By Oliver "Buzz" Thomas Mon Nov 20, 6:40 AM ET What if Christian leaders are wrong about homosexuality? I suppose, much as a newspaper maintains its credibility by setting the record straight, church leaders would need to do the same: ADVERTISEMENT Correction: Despite what you might have read, heard or been taught throughout your churchgoing life, homosexuality is, in fact, determined at birth and is not to be condemned by God's followers. Based on a few recent headlines, we won't be seeing that admission anytime soon. Last week, U.S. Roman Catholic bishops took the position that homosexual attractions are "disordered" and that gays should live closeted lives of chastity. At the same time, North Carolina's Baptist State Convention was preparing to investigate churches that are too gay-friendly. Even the more liberal Presbyterian Church (USA) had been planning to put a minister on trial for conducting a marriage ceremony for two women before the charges were dismissed on a technicality. All this brings me back to the question: What if we're wrong? Religion's only real commodity, after all, is its moral authority. Lose that, and we lose our credibility. Lose credibility, and we might as well close up shop. It's happened to Christianity before, most famously when we dug in our heels over Galileo's challenge to the biblical view that the Earth, rather than the sun, was at the center of our solar system. You know the story. Galileo was persecuted for what turned out to be incontrovertibly true. For many, especially in the scientific community, Christianity never recovered. This time, Christianity is in danger of squandering its moral authority by continuing its pattern of discrimination against gays and lesbians in the face of mounting scientific evidence that sexual orientation has little or nothing to do with choice. To the contrary, whether sexual orientation arises as a result of the mother's hormones or the child's brain structure or DNA, it is almost certainly an accident of birth. The point is this: Without choice, there can be no moral culpability. Answer in Scriptures So, why are so many church leaders (not to mention Orthodox Jewish and Muslim leaders) persisting in their view that homosexuality is wrong despite a growing stream of scientific evidence that is likely to become a torrent in the coming years? The answer is found in Leviticus 18. "You shall not lie with a man as with a woman; it is an abomination." As a former "the Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it" kind of guy, I am sympathetic with any Christian who accepts the Bible at face value. But here's the catch. Leviticus is filled with laws imposing the death penalty for everything from eating catfish to sassing your parents. If you accept one as the absolute, unequivocal word of God, you must accept them all. For many of gay America's loudest critics, the results are unthinkable. First, no more football. At least not without gloves. Handling a pig skin is an abomination. Second, no more Saturday games even if you can get a new ball. Violating the Sabbath is a capital offense according to Leviticus. For the over-40 crowd, approaching the altar of God with a defect in your sight is taboo, but you'll have plenty of company because those menstruating or with disabilities are also barred. The truth is that mainstream religion has moved beyond animal sacrifice, slavery and the host of primitive rituals described in Leviticus centuries ago. Selectively hanging onto these ancient proscriptions for gays and lesbians exclusively is unfair according to anybody's standard of ethics. We lawyers call it "selective enforcement," and in civil affairs it's illegal. A better reading of Scripture starts with the book of Genesis and the grand pronouncement about the world God created and all those who dwelled in it. "And, the Lord saw that it was good." If God created us and if everything he created is good, how can a gay person be guilty of being anything more than what God created him or her to be? Turning to the New Testament, the writings of the Apostle Paul at first lend credence to the notion that homosexuality is a sin, until you consider that Paul most likely is referring to the Roman practice of pederasty, a form of pedophilia common in the ancient world. Successful older men often took boys into their homes as concubines, lovers or sexual slaves. Today, such sexual exploitation of minors is no longer tolerated. The point is that the sort of long-term, committed, same-sex relationships that are being debated today are not addressed in the New Testament. It distorts the biblical witness to apply verses written in one historical context (i.e. sexual exploitation of children) to contemporary situations between two monogamous partners of the same sex. Sexual promiscuity is condemned by the Bible whether it's between gays or straights. Sexual fidelity is not. What would Jesus do? For those who have lingering doubts, dust off your Bibles and take a few hours to reacquaint yourself with the teachings of Jesus. You won't find a single reference to homosexuality. There are teachings on money, lust, revenge, divorce, fasting and a thousand other subjects, but there is nothing on homosexuality. Strange, don't you think, if being gay were such a moral threat? On the other hand, Jesus spent a lot of time talking about how we should treat others. First, he made clear it is not our role to judge. It is God's. ("Judge not lest you be judged." Matthew 7:1) And, second, he commanded us to love other people as we love ourselves. So, I ask you. Would you want to be discriminated against? Would you want to lose your job, housing or benefits because of something over which you had no control? Better yet, would you like it if society told you that you couldn't visit your lifelong partner in the hospital or file a claim on his behalf if he were murdered? The suffering that gay and lesbian people have endured at the hands of religion is incalculable, but they can look expectantly to the future for vindication. Scientific facts, after all, are a stubborn thing. Even our religious beliefs must finally yield to them as the church in its battle with Galileo ultimately realized. But for religion, the future might be ominous. Watching the growing conflict between medical science and religion over homosexuality is like watching a train wreck from a distance. You can see it coming for miles and sense the inevitable conclusion, but you're powerless to stop it. The more church leaders dig in their heels, the worse it's likely to be. Oliver "Buzz" Thomas is a Baptist minister and author of an upcoming book, 10 Things Your Minister Wants to Tell You (But Can't Because He Needs the Job). ________________________________________________

AOL pulled it for some reason, but here it is on YouTube with subtitles. Good God how terrible! First he's way out of line, then he makes it worse and worse. People walking out en masse and upset audience members confronting him. It's horrible, and I guess he can leave his career at the door. Racism really gets to me, being a minority myself (gay) I can totally relate to how bad that must feel, and I have zero tolerance on bigotry. What a jerk!

*looks at your age* Ah, 80s child! Personally I was more of a He-Man boy myself back in the day. The gay innuendo in that original 80s series is startling!

How did they manage the handling of the Bond-cliches? Its said to be a new approach as to storyline, which interests me but I'm no Bond fan myself. Can anyone comment on how close the movie is to the Ian Fleming original?

Thanks to all for the warm welcome! >>I remember Warcraft when looking at that word. (Orc) Warcraft has exploded like you wouldn't believe. Google "World of Warcraft", their community is MASSIVE and the artistic quality of their virtual world is staggering. Hundreds of thousands of people pay $10 or so a month to walk around as an Orc, madness! My Orcs however aren't based on Warcraft nor Lord of the Rings. Though they superficially resemble modern World of Warcraft Orcs in their looks, I created mine well over a decade before they came into being. I'm creating a fictional world where many of my stories take place, and I've been doing this with dedication since 1990. My Orcs and I go way back >>Welcome! Where can I find your stories? Reading about lustful orcs sound really funny. If you picture Orcs like I portray them - wildmen somewhere between man and beast, in a primal natural state, funny won't be the word.. perhaps "hot" is, if you can get into it. Online there exists a sizable gay community of Orc-fanciers for 5 years now. Currently we're in the midst of a moving operation, because the provider is going defunct, but at the last headcount we were over 2000 Orcs strong >>I'm sure you'll make a great addition to the GA family! >>Welcome to the best of places with the greatest of people. It's always a good sign when people refer to their web-community like that. This really looks like quite a friendly corner of the web! ...Oook! I've added a story, First Notch Right, in eFiction > Fantasy > Other It's controversial, so i hope it won't lead to me getting my eFiction notice

I greatly prefer actual hardcopy over reading off the screen. In hardcopy, I prefer either stacks of sheets or printout books that I bound myself over most commercial books. Part of this is my aversion of glue binding, which often makes books come apart after a while. I love paper manuscripts in general, a typical writers fetish

Do you prefer to read off the screen, or do you like to hold hardcopy in your hands? and in case of the latter, do you prefer a stack of sheets or a book?