Jump to content
  • entries
    116
  • comments
    370
  • views
    44,672

Someting To Share...


Were this only an April's fool's joke…

 

But, yesterday I was surfing the web, looking for images of Gay couples from the past, and stumbled on something sobering. A news article on human rights for our kind referenced a 1967 Supreme Court of Canada decision. It seems a man, Everett George Klippert, who apparently had no fear of the police, and no problem being Gay, casually mentioned the fact while talking to the RCMP (the Mounties, or the equivalent of our FBI) during the investigation of an unrelated matter. The forty-year-old mechanic was arrested, received no official information vis-à-vis a Miranda Rights warning, and "confessed" the obvious, that he had spent his entire adult life as a well-adjusted Gay person.

 

He was tried and convicted based upon his own statements, as no witnesses were called, nor indeed were any claims of 'harm' to others, or of public 'indecency' listed in the indictment. His sentence was begun, but when he asserted his sovereign rights not to be castrated, lobotomized, electro-shocked, or otherwise 'treated for his problem,' the court deemed him a "dangerous sex offender" and sentenced him to life in prison.

 

The Supreme Court of Canada affirmed that the Northwest Territorial government had the discretion to incarcerate a man for the rest of his life for simply being Gay. The Court shocked Canada. No individual person's rights to civil liberty were asserted if the government said they did not exist. The then Minster of Justice, Pierre Trudeau, immediately began the slow process of organizing what would finally pass in the early 1980s as Canada's Bill of Rights, The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, while Trudeau was Prime Minister. The Charter did not include language prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, and as late as 1998 The Supreme Court of Canada was still grappling with people being fired based upon nothing more than their private lives.

 

The CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Company) has archived most of their news broadcasts. The link below is to the national radio report filed the evening of the 1967 Court ruling.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/player/Digital+Archives/Politics/Rights+and+Freedoms/ID/1724049971/?sort=MostPopular

 

In the summer of 1971, Everett George Klippert was finally released from Territorial prison. This was only made possible by Trudeau's political bravery in pushing for the decimalization of consensual affectional expression between adults in 1969. Why Klippert continued to be jailed for two more years, is a mystery. At least in this instance, thanks to gusty leadership, Canada was far ahead of the US. Our Supreme Court only fully decriminalize being Gay in the summer of 2004!

 

The CBC also has a timeline of the LGTB rights movement in Canada. or
http://www.cbc.ca/doczone/features/timeline-of-gay-rights

 


So, as we sit-out these last few weeks, waiting for the Supreme Court to do it's job and apply the equal protection clause of our Constitution to same-sex couples, we had better pause and think about how far and how fast we have come.

  • Like 2

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

Zombie

Posted

Pretty disgraceful. Can't understand why he remained in prison for 2 more years - did someone forget? Did he have to apply to the court "Oh, this crime you convicted me of - well it's been abolished - when are you going to let me out?"

 

Something even worse happened to gays in Germany. When the Allies defeated Nazi Germany , the political and remaining Jewish prisoners were released from the camps but the homosexual prisoners were never released because the Nazi law "Paragraph 175" remained law under the new West Germany until the same year  - 1969. So those innocent men watched as their fellow prisoners were set free, but remained prisoners for 24 more years.

 

Btw welcome to GA :)

  • Like 2
Daddydavek

Posted

Our (the US Supreme Court) is unlikely to fully assert the equal protection clause about a right to marriage.  It will probably over-turn DOMA thus leaving it up to the states.  However, I also believe it will decide the California case in such a way as to apply only to California.  There is a vast area of the country that has plenty of gay people who live in isolation with little legal protection from the state.  Their fate could remain that way for decades....

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...