W_L Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 http://www.nature.com/news/artificial-black-hole-creates-its-own-version-of-hawking-radiation-1.20430 Technically, they are cousins to the giant black holes of the universe, but with the recent discovery of potentially observable Hawking radiation, we may finally have an experimental way to test out theories on a lot of thing black hole related, chief among' them is a concept of negative energy (the stuff of dreams and FTL drive theories, including the Alcubierre Warp Drive theory).
JamesSavik Posted August 31, 2016 Posted August 31, 2016 Isn't this how bad sci-fi movies start on the SyFried network?
Site Administrator Graeme Posted August 31, 2016 Site Administrator Posted August 31, 2016 I was disappointed. The physicist wasn't creating artificial black holes, he was creating an acoustic analogue of a black hole and looking for the acoustic equivalent of Hawking radiation. It was certainly interesting, but it's a long way from creating artificial black holes
W_L Posted August 31, 2016 Author Posted August 31, 2016 I was disappointed. The physicist wasn't creating artificial black holes, he was creating an acoustic analogue of a black hole and looking for the acoustic equivalent of Hawking radiation. It was certainly interesting, but it's a long way from creating artificial black holes Graeme, we would need a massive implosion to get a real Black hole created, which would be very unsafe for any human being within an AU. At least now, we can test out black hole theories without getting ourselves removed from existence Negative energy is the most important thing to uncover, it would put us on the path to create interstellar spacecraft eventually, not to mention resolve some long standing issues in Quantum mechanics/General Relativity 1
Site Administrator Graeme Posted August 31, 2016 Site Administrator Posted August 31, 2016 Graeme, we would need a massive implosion to get a real Black hole created, which would be very unsafe for any human being within an AU. Not necessarily. In James Hogan's Thrice Upon A Time he theorised that the implosion used to create nuclear fusion in an inertial confinement fusion reactor could reach the levels required to create a miniature black hole. We're not at that level of technology yet, but we don't need a massive implosion -- just a very small but intense one.
W_L Posted September 1, 2016 Author Posted September 1, 2016 (edited) Not necessarily. In James Hogan's Thrice Upon A Time he theorised that the implosion used to create nuclear fusion in an inertial confinement fusion reactor could reach the levels required to create a miniature black hole. We're not at that level of technology yet, but we don't need a massive implosion -- just a very small but intense one. Well, if we can create one that size and it doesn't collapse due to Hawking Radiation, then we should think about making wormholes for instant communication Travel might not be possible immediately, but instant communication is a good idea. Still this is a good first step, Here's another article, by the way another team from Ottawa is testing another technique to compare the results from Israel with astrological black hole data with an article published last month. http://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-have-created-a-black-hole-in-the-lab-and-it-could-finally-confirm-the-existence-of-hawking-radiation Edited September 1, 2016 by W_L
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now