So, naturally, the writers who haven't been through GA's system of critiquing and editing are the ones who are most likely to create the lackluster, hyper-romantic stuff mentioned in your original post. I paired this with the lack of emotional maturity and experience common in younger writers, and age/high school was definitely mentioned somewhere in the thread; it's easy to see how I arrived at teenagers. We're also a generation of heavy internet-users, so I assume that we make up for a large part of most forums' situated populations, and an even larger part of their inexperienced user base. And, my post was only offering another cause. We're clearly a part of your problem, after all.
I agree that GA positively influences gay authors; that's what it exists for. On a larger scale, though, people tend to fall into traps with their writing until they've found the same sort of feedback, and before that, pieces with the mentioned flaws are produced. Like you said, you can have a local effect, but new users will always be signing up, and there will always be an influx of questionable writing. That part of the equation isn't changeable, and your original post is evidence that it never really disappears. Also, "ignore" wasn't the right word. I meant that it's easier to help those within your reach, and accept (without the annoyance hinted at by your original alliteration) that some sickeningly saccharine stuff is going to be pushed into the world of online writing. It's natural and unavoidable. Again, like you said, it can and will be helped by GA's more talented members or by whatever educational system a writer happens to be a part of. There's no real reason to fret over it.
And, for the almost mandatory apologetic paragraph, I didn't mean to come off as offensive, patronizing, or demoralizing. Thank you for your welcome, and I'm sorry that I've caused conflict
EDIT: Also, check the third post. That's the first time teenagers are mentioned.