Safety Board Wants to Lower BAC Driving Limits
Safety Board: Legally Drunk Should be .05 instead of .08
I'm pretty against this. When I was in college, I had a system of having four drinks within an hour, which created a nice little buzz, and then waiting two hours while eating before driving myself home, and I never at any time felt like I was impaired. Four drinks + two hours of waiting around was perfectly responsible and safe.
I think the recomendation as written would mean that a typical male could only have 3 drinks before being legally drunk, and a typical woman couldn't have more than two drinks. This would really affect the casual drinker- people who show up for Happy Hour after work and have just a few drinks, who now face being criminals.
In my case, I don't really have more than two or three drinks when I go out now because I just drink to take the edge off as opposed to getting a real buzz like I used to, so I should still be fine if the new rules are implemented, but I'm still worried that this could criminalize perfectly responsible behavior. I'm fine the idea of stiffer penalities for people driving at .08 and higher, and the BAC ignition locks for repeat DUI offenders.
This is lurdicrous, however. I totally figured this was coming- has anyone noticed those "Buzzed Driving Is Still Drunk Driving" PSA's? I did remember my professor, back in '08, saying that he thinks the Nanny Police will try and get the BAC lowered again, and lo and behold...
5 Comments
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now