Jump to content
  • entries
    261
  • comments
    535
  • views
    146,235

Safety Board Wants to Lower BAC Driving Limits


methodwriter85

838 views

Safety Board: Legally Drunk Should be .05 instead of .08

 

I'm pretty against this. When I was in college, I had a system of having four drinks within an hour, which created a nice little buzz, and then waiting two hours while eating before driving myself home, and I never at any time felt like I was impaired. Four drinks + two hours of waiting around was perfectly responsible and safe.

 

I think the recomendation as written would mean that a typical male could only have 3 drinks before being legally drunk, and a typical woman couldn't have more than two drinks. This would really affect the casual drinker- people who show up for Happy Hour after work and have just a few drinks, who now face being criminals.

 

In my case, I don't really have more than two or three drinks when I go out now because I just drink to take the edge off as opposed to getting a real buzz like I used to, so I should still be fine if the new rules are implemented, but I'm still worried that this could criminalize perfectly responsible behavior. I'm fine the idea of stiffer penalities for people driving at .08 and higher, and the BAC ignition locks for repeat DUI offenders.

 

This is lurdicrous, however. I totally figured this was coming- has anyone noticed those "Buzzed Driving Is Still Drunk Driving" PSA's? I did remember my professor, back in '08, saying that he thinks the Nanny Police will try and get the BAC lowered again, and lo and behold...

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

 

Currently, more than 100 countries on six continents have BAC limits set at 0.05 or lower, the safety board said.

 

 

You know, if you want to have four drinks, have four drinks. Just don't get behind the wheel of a car. In fact, if you have one drink, don't drive. That would be perfectly responsible behavior.

Link to comment

I'm not against lowering the BAC limit in theory, but I think in practice it won't solve anything. People are still going to get behind a wheel and drive impaired, regardless of whether its .08 or .05. It will absolutely lead to more arrests, but will it stop drunk driving? I doubt it. And its another form of control by the government that does no measurable good to solve a serious problem. 

Link to comment
  • Site Administrator

I'm against a single drink and driving! I was almost killed by a drunk driver, and ended up with bad enough injuries that I'm in pain every single day. For once, the drunk paid the ultimate price during the accident and he died instead of me or my husband, but there is never, ever, any excuse to drink and drive. I enjoy alcohol, so it's not that I'm against drinking in general; I just don't think people need to put others at risk when they make poor decisions and that's exactly what driving while impaired, even 'just a little buzzed', does.

 

That being said, while I agree it won't stop people from driving impaired, maybe it will make those who think it's okay to drink a little and drive lose their licenses just that much faster. Though, in an ideal situation, anyone that blew any measurable alcohol after being pulled over would lose their licenses completely. I know that seems a bit extreme, but it only takes being trapped in a car for over an hour while being cut out, worrying the whole time and moving your toes just to make sure you can even with a broken hip and shattered femur, to make me a pretty firm advocate for sobriety while operating machinery that has such potential for tragedy.

Link to comment

That being said, while I agree it won't stop people from driving impaired, maybe it will make those who think it's okay to drink a little and drive lose their licenses just that much faster. Though, in an ideal situation, anyone that blew any measurable alcohol after being pulled over would lose their licenses completely. I know that seems a bit extreme, but it only takes being trapped in a car for over an hour while being cut out, worrying the whole time and moving your toes just to make sure you can even with a broken hip and shattered femur, to make me a pretty firm advocate for sobriety while operating machinery that has such potential for tragedy.

 

Its funny, because my mom said literally almost the same exact thing when we saw it on ABC World News. Are you sure all women don't think alike? :P

Link to comment

Laws can change social attitudes. Which in turn changes social behaviour - which is the desired outcome. Take seat belt laws - people resisted like crazy and resented being made to wear them. But everyone now knows they save lives and everyone wears them without complaint.
Same with drink drive. It used to be a macho thing to get legless before getting behind the wheel - friends would encourage you to "have one more for the road" - but now the only people who do that are those with a serious drink problem. So it's not the principle of drink driving law that people have issues with it's where is it reasonable to set the limit. And that's a can of worms because everyone metabolises booze differently - some people get buzzed on a bag of wine gums :P
 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Our Privacy Policy can be found here: Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..