Mac

It is a necessity that Travis fucks Austin, too. Will should fuck Kendo.

I guess Luis de Andrade will turn to be hidden bisexual boy in closet. Or a sex maniac. Expecting Luis to have some sex even on the all-male ship... The great and joyous happening would be if Andrade develops an yearning to bottom with another boy - and I am allowed to see that sex scene.

Isn't it generally agreed that the thing Kendoll needs is to get fucked (deep) by Will ? Kendo to get really fulfilling fill. In that situation, Kendo receives what he needs. In spades. Sufficiently big one. 9 inches and relatively girthy (I guess some 1.35 inches thick). And in the situation, Travis could do Kendo immediately after Will has ejaculated. When Kendo's tunnel is still wet and lubed. Later, Travis will explain to Kendo that it wasn't anything gay. That Travis merely follows the example of Will, to get off. That joining Will's sex episode is merely their habit from the boyhood, a repeating ritual of brotherhood. Yeah.

The big picture is that Austin has the penis that easily has room in Will's canal, and does not even force the canal into straightness. All the natural wrinkles of the canal are allowed to remain whatever is any wrinkle's natural position. Will has chosen well the guy. And remembers to say his gratitude for the situation. By the way, because Will is a tall boy, it is credible that his canal could be something like 22 cm long (~8.7 inches) and, though gymnastically impossible, would take his own member in with merely some slight battering... Travis is physiologically not any real challenge to Will, I guess. However Travis presumably packs a slight amount of inches more than Austin. Of course a partnership is not dependent merely on those inches (or is it?) but should we expect that in the end, Will is going to choose Travis. After all, Travis is good for Will's versatility. As we already heard. Travis seems to love to have his own canal "straightened" to its maximum, now and then. (Whereas there is no evidence thus far that Austin would gladly and enjoyable serve as Will's bottom boy ever. I do have a premonition that when experimenting, Austin will complain like a bitch that is battered. Rather, I would expect that taking in Will, is something that is never within Austin's comfort zone.)

Will is such a nice guy, to have become satisfied with 'simple pleasures'. A Size Queen Will is not, or is no longer: ..."his cock was absolutely beautiful." ..."It was probably a little shorter than seven inches and about average size." ,,,"I thought of how perfect it was for fucking another dude."... "started to work his dick inside me".. "pleasure as he filled me up." ..."making sure I was enjoying it"... "I felt my ass totally open up, ... begging him to enter." 6.5 inches (~17 cm) is a length so easy for everyone to take in the canal. There is a danger of allowing the membranic wall or other of the canal to be cut and damaged, if the intruding member is either too long or it has something angular sharpness. A cut in such a wall is often healed, though could be painful for a while - but occasionally a rip could actually be very dangerous, either b/c of inflammation or b/c unrepairable thus necessitating artificial bypass of the intestinal. Too long an intruder pushes, and possibly rips, the stomach end of the canal, which is averagely some 8 inches (~20 cm) +- of length - though there is variation, generally correlating with the tallness of the bottom guy. Penises are (despite perceived hardness) however tissue and with soft surface - those facts help. But too long a penis (such as, over 8 inches long) causes some discomfort, and stretches the canal's length so the canal is "straightened" to its maximum. "About average size" of Austin is likely signifying a girth with dimeter of about 1 inch (~2.54cm) but certainly not as much as 1.5 inch (~3.8cm). In other words, Will is not stretching his sphincter muscles. Ring muscles flex easily as open as 3cm (~1.2 inches) when the bottom is not totally inexperienced. All in all, dear Will gives a very good impression. Will understands now that comfort is the important thing. (The intuitive idiotism of desiring as big as possible to make (actually) "violence" to ring muscles, is merely for those who receive enjoyment from getting stretched as open as into absurdity, widening their opening into unnaturalness.) I congratulate Will for his moderateness and for his understanding of sustainable physical enjoyments.

my assessment that Troy is a bottom, was correct. Looking forward to Will getting introduced to Troy and Troy to take Will in his inside. Intriguing to think whether one day Austin decides to work Will inside his own bottom Almost inevitable, despite of Austin's topness. Austin is certainly having a dose of cusiosity. However, the outcome of such curious experiment could be that Austin is never again going to take in real fat cocks. Or any cocks at all. One day in the future, Austin surely meets the boy who was fucking Troy. And the boy probably whines that Troy is hopelessly bottom and therefore not really fulfilling in a partnership. Whereby Austin decides to fuck the boy, in order to be helpful - and to turn the tables. Both will be real happy after the encounter.

hey nice

yeah!

Ah. The unforgettable year 1997 ! It was a very nice year,

From careful records, it seems to be known that King don Carlos IV was a homosexual man. He was not really a feminine male, but nevertheless a homosexual. He was tall and corpulent: a big man. That was genome from his maternal grandfather King August III of Poland, and from August's forebears. The great-grandfather, King August II, was nicknamed August the Strong. These had been big men. King don Carlos IV was quite empty-headed: a person we would call "brainless". King don Carlos IV loved hunting. An outdoors type guy. Also a sportsman. His male lovers seem to been discreet. My hypothesis is: because the future Carlos IV's father, King don Carlos III, understood his heir's disinterest towards females, King don Carlos III sought a closest possible relative to become Carlos IV's wife, in order to take care that any children would have anyway the royal blood of the dynasty. The marriage with Maria Luisa was actually the first between full cousins in this dynasty. Felipe VI and Carlos III had both married very distant queens: Elisabetta Maria of Parma and Amelia of Poland. Maria Luisa was an exception, a full cousin: the nearest possible. There is a record from deathbed confession: the story is that a priest who gave Maria Luisa her last absolution in Rome in her deathbed, had told that Maria Luisa confessed that none of children she birthed, were sired by her husband King don Carlos IV. That Maria Luisa wanted, before her death, to confess this sin and to receive absolution. It was well known already in the 1790s, that Godoy had sired Maria Luisa's four youngest children. But the deathbed confession would mean that also all the elder children of Maria Luisa were also sired by a sortiment of other males. By this evidence, King don Carlos IV was unwilling to copulate with his cousin-wife. And King don Carlos IV gladly permitted that Maria Luisa utilized other men to sire her children. Seemingly, Maria Luisa had a strong libido. Most Bourbons had. King don Carlos IV's libido undoubtedly was directed to other males. Seemingly, the couple (particularly King don Carlos IV) wanted to have children. To raise.

This royal couple, Carlos IV and his cousin-wife Maria Luisa, are very mistakenly described in the linked video. Firstly, the author of the video is a huge exaggerator and liar. Several of the allegations presented in the video, are basically untrue. The couple's genealogy is presented as much worse as it really is. The author clearly wants to condemn even all distant consanguinities, against better medical knowledge. Quite clearly, that author wants to present all royal marriages as bad as was truly the marriage of the parents of the late king Carlos II. Presumably the author's motivation is to gather listeners by ignorant prejudices of exaggerating "incest". In the Spanish Bourbon lineage, this marriage was actually the first between full cousins. All earlier royal couples in their lineage had been much less incestuous. This royal couple's fathers really were brothers. However, contrary to the authors prejudice-raising rant, that alone is not that much dangerous. And in this case, this royal couple's mothers were only distantly related with each other and with their spouses. The two mothers had brought a lot of non-related genome into this couple: genome from Marie Leszynska and genome from the protestant-born August III. And, the royal couple's shared paternal grandmother Elisabetta Maria of Parma Farnese, had brought a lot of non-related genome into the fathers of this couple. It simply is a miracle that the video author has not yet (in comments or elsewhere) been revealed and condemned as fraudster. Secondly, the author simply did not count in this matter, or was ignorant, that the couple's legal children generally were not sired by Carlos IV. The author's entire argument of cousin-marriage fails in all cases where Carlos IV was not the sire. The vide is a failure. Product of a liar.

I disagree. Firstly, having several different girlfriends gives a strong indication (known well to real experts, connoisseurs) that the boy has no real sexual relationship nor interest in any of them. And connoisseurs know well that gay males enjoy the company of girls, some of those being his personal faghags. Intuitively heterosexual boys envy those boys who do have girlfriends as many as several on his both arms. (And, intuitively, gayboy classmates feel frustrated because such a super hetero boy is an inaccessible hetero.) Connoisseurs know better. A long time ago, a fuckbuddy of mine was a pupil in an Upper High School. He would have wanted a cute boy, one year older than him, in the same school. But felt frustrated, because the wanted boy did really have girlfriends as many as several on his both arms "all the time" in the school. Three years later, the wanted boy appeared with his then temp boyfriend to dance in the best local gay club. And met me. Some fucking ensued - he was not at all faithful to the temp, and he wanted more thickness if you understand what I mean. (My friend, the fuckbuddy who meanwhile had moved to Australia to study and found someone, revealed the identity to me when I told him the name of the new boy. Hilarity ensued.) Secondly, "meet as much as possible", in their situations means however a limited time together. By force of their circumstances, the two are so much apart. In those, even being always together when the can, does not mean a lot of time. They are together quite sporadically only. Thirdly, Travis may benefit a lot of being constantly seen in company of a well-known sodomite. Such metrosexuality was at the time an admired characteristic, particularly for an entertainer professional. Honi soit qui mal y pense. I do not like such a style of threatening legal action. Sad and stupid. To even think about those mental carcasses who do that. Sounds so much of what some repugnants, i.e repues, are doing. Such as the current vulgar, the beloved leader of the repues.

these two don't need to keep their friendship secret. they only need to keep their homosexual coupling as deniable. these two have been friends since childhood. therefore it is fully understandable that they are friends and that they are together as much as possible. Travis' career and life does not get destroyed if he is deniable and could be a heterosexual. i would guess that his career and life are preserved, even if turns out public he had had some bisexual metrosexualities with his friend Will. almost the sole thing to oblige Travis to remain non-homosexual in public eye, is the need that he continues to be alluring also in eyes of the girl audience. therefore, Travis needs to fuck Will (and get fucked) only behind closed walls and windows. no paparazzi with open view.

hi By the way, I love when Will expresses his sore sph.

this Yo, Rey is pronounced in Spanish (= in castilian spanish)