Jump to content

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • Site Moderator
drpaladin

Posted

Being omniscient without omnipotence could be a version of Hell.

  • Like 4
KrisK

Posted

17 minutes ago, drpaladin said:

Being omniscient without omnipotence could be a version of Hell.

Or, being omnipotent without being omniscient could be Hell for everyone else! 

  • Like 5
  • Site Moderator
drpaladin

Posted

6 minutes ago, KrisK said:

Or, being omnipotent without being omniscient could be Hell for everyone else! 

Theoretically, omnipotence could bring forth omniscience.

  • Like 4
KrisK

Posted

3 hours ago, drpaladin said:

Theoretically, omnipotence could bring forth omniscience.

Haha, but then 'theoretically' the reverse is true too! If I am omniscient, then I know all things, including how to make myself omnipotent.

  • Like 3
  • Site Moderator
drpaladin

Posted

14 minutes ago, KrisK said:

Haha, but then 'theoretically' the reverse is true too! If I am omniscient, then I know all things, including how to make myself omnipotent.

But you also might know you can't. 

  • Haha 3
KrisK

Posted

6 minutes ago, drpaladin said:

But you also might know you can't. 

Okay, I surrender! I remember from my long ago freshman philosophy course that there were arguments that none of the three 'omnis', omnipotence, omniscience, omnipresence could simultaneously coexist. As well as arguments supporting the notion that they could. But I don't remember the arguments and think I may be overmatched here, even if I could conjure them up. 😁 

  • Haha 3
  • Site Administrator
wildone

Posted

I like to think of @Myr as being omniscient of everything GA :unsure: 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...