Like the post above me, I'm coming on this pretty late. (Congrats on becoming a hosted author by the way!!) First, off I whole heartily agree with all the compliments on your writing. You so eloquently and succinctly express your thoughts in a way that makes me, well slightly envious.
As a lurker who pretty much just observes from afar, I vacillate between "struggling" to identify with a label, and deciding to just f*** it-who really cares anyway? But this post struck a chord with me about my own journey with labels and sexuality.
When I was growing up, I had the fantasy of finding a boyfriend, getting married, having kids, and a car, and a dog, and "living happily ever after." There really wasn't room for any other narrative in my world view...coming from the small community I did, there really wasn't the option for there to be.
I don't really remember when that view expanded, but gradually it did. In high school "sexuality" was two options: you were either gay or straight.
Then came college, and suddenly, my world view expanded and I started lurking on line. Among other things, my best friend, who had been in a very serious relationship with a girl, came out (not to the surprise of anyone); my best girlfriend, who had come out in high school, fell in love with a guy; and I jumped on a whole new band wagon. This time, it was the "everyone's different degrees of bi" philosophy. At the time it was kind of a revelation of sorts. As we all do from time to time (or maybe it's just me0:)) I even prided myself on what "liberal" and "open" thinking I was engaging in.
Oh my. I've since come to see that even that narrative is problematic. And, the issue I have with it really is more mathematical than anything. This is the progression as I see it: we (as in USAmerican "society") went from having just one point-or one option for the expression of sexuality: "straight" to having two: now you're either "straight" or "gay." Which opened up a lot of space for a lot of people, but still doesn't quite cut it. So, we throw in the line connecting the two points ("bi") and now we have a scale on which to place ourselves. However, that scale, or rather that line, is still confining and really doesn't, in my opinion, allow for all of the possibles ways sexuality can be expressed and experienced. You're still operating on a binary, you still really have only two (maybe three if you're lucky) options in that system.
How in the world can only three possibilities account for the infinite number of ways that the human experience is expressed?
Take my own internal reactions for a second. I am a female, I am very much a female and, while the identity of my gender is not in question, there are times, and ways in which I "identify" (if you can really call it that) as male-and, interestingly enough, sometimes it's sexual. And don't even get me started on the whole "asexual" aspect of my being. Because it is there (I've never had a "romantic" or "sexual" relationship of any kind with anyone for starters) along with strong sexual attraction to many people from many walks of life over the years. What then, is to be done with all of that? Should I just label myself as "confused" and go through the angst and worry of trying to "figure" out "what" I am, even though "what" I am changes moment to moment anyway?
Personally, I would rather not. (I just wish I had the guts to actually live this...) Instead of trying to come up with labels and boxes that we can put ourselves and (even worse) others in, let's maybe add a third point, or rather another axis to the model above. Why not take binary system of black/white, right/wrong, yes/no, one/many, x/y and expand it so it's more spherical in nature-allowing for infinite points of expression along an infinite plane of possibility?
It's kind of ironic, really, because I think I've come full circle in the quest for labels. Instead of putting everyone on the gay/straight/bi line, maybe a better "label" to have is that we're all sexual. And in that aspect of our humanity, we all have a myriad of ways to express and experience that sexual nature. (Including the negation of it.)
Why can't we just leave it at that?
Trust me, I understand the investment labels (it's one thing to say, another to do)...and how terrifying it is to break out of their grasp. They provide the illusion of safety and of ground. Unfortunately, they are no more than that- illusory; and, sadly, the tighter we grasp onto anything for safety, the more likely we are to cause harm-harm to ourselves and harm to others.
So I just looked up to breathe and realized this was getting a little lengthy and soap-boxy. I think that's probably a good note to end on.
Thank you for your writing and for getting the discussion rolling.
And sorry for my rambling!