Family-friendly usually means gay-contemptuous

BTW- the Pulitzer prize is for journalists and that not what we do.

Family-friendly usually means gay-contemptuous

 

BTW- the Pulitzer prize is for journalists and that not what we do.

Yeah, but I don't think they get that either.

I forgot to mention the people who think breast feeding in public is bad. Christ.

haha, nice.

Kinda like the guy who said that the only people who went to Nifty were there to molest themselves.

I'm not a prude for finding the ad distasteful. Just seemed out of place. I have no problem with sex in anything. And it wasn't that the ad was placed here, it's just that the ad itself (based on what it was for) was questionable. If that had been an ad even for something not involving homosexuality, I would have thought the same thing. Everything serves a purpose and has a place. Imo.

Kinda like the guy who said that the only people who went to Nifty were there to molest themselves.

LOL. I was shocked at that post.

and yeah, some people are so ridiculous. they think that anything with overly graphic descriptions of sex is not to be considered in any way good literature.

f**king get off your high-horses people.

STOP SWEARING

my sensibilities are suffering horribly :sniff:

STOP SWEARING

 

my sensibilities are suffering horribly :sniff:

You are so full of shit.

lol, I'm not sure about the add, since my browswer automatically blocks everything I don't allow. Which is in place mostly for that purpose, blocking adds means they won't load, means quicker loading of my comics ^^

but I seem to have no trouble with graphic sex (unless it is written baaaadly) and neither with picture of half naked men on my screen XP

and I agree with Cia, children see two men who are scarcely dressed as they see themselves, not fully dressed we see them as naked men who might be going to do "something".... just f**ked up

Ima take a picture in my underwear and post it up. =D

(joke)

Anyways, the ad seemed alright with me, a little steamy, but I like that.

mark your so racy you vicious bitch

I agree with Mark. No one surfing the web unattended should be younger than 13, so a certain level of violence and sexuality is acceptable. Say, PG-13 level in a movie should be PG-13 on the web. Partial male nudity, sexual situations, dirty language, a bit of blood, etc.

Mark, this reminded me of my 'Domluka Literary Society' Skit from back in 2005.

You should write something along those lines to share your feelings

Mark, this reminded me of my 'Domluka Literary Society' Skit from back in 2005.

 

You should write something along those lines to share your feelings

Hey Vic, post a link for us. Or post the skit.

If these ppl are so offended...what were they doing here in the first place? jeezus.

I dunno about condemning those ppl to communing with the Focus on the Family and James Dobson though. That's a special kind of hell, IMHO. Their version of heaven has me looking forward to the rockin' party I'm going to enjoy in hell.

I'm guessing we're looking at some internalized homophobia (re: racy gay themed ads) and sexism (re: public breastfeeding).

I am sorry I didn't get to see these "racy" images - I am presuming we are not talking about full on penetrative sex involving several people of varying sexes are we? and anything short of that can been seen any and every day in the "straight" media.....