Mac

such are my some theories about bottoms...

TROY: Me and a few of my friends, we are bodybuilders. We do bodybuilding by exercising our anal ring muscles. We want to have the best anal muscles. We train our ring muscles to do milking and to open wide by our wills and to grow elastic and to be flexible and to have a capacity to contract close and to be gaping for minutes. And to take effortlessly in dildoes that have the diameter of 1.5 inches as well as, with plenty of lubricants to take in dildoes that have the diameter of 2 inches.

Colton looks an awful lot like Kevin Carmichael, son of the Pastor. find a chronologically suitable Carmichael to have fathered Colton some 19 years earlier: either the gay David Carmichael or the pastor Carmichael himself. any bets?

Passing over all the vivid graphic descriptions.... I do have a vision how proceeds when Austin and Troy talk just after they left the other couple: They wind out their feelings and they confess to one another. Troy: I got fucked by all three of you. Relentlessly. It was really nice. Austin: Me too. Penetrated by all three of you and my hole real full. Though everyone is basically nice, Will's big thick dick is not one of my favorites. How you became such an eager beaver to fuck me? Troy: Will's big thick dick feels really good. Travis and you are good. Will is a spice in sex life - when I need occasionally someone who really stretches me open. You are important: my routine fucker always when I need the usual internal massage. Troy (after a pause): Will's dick massaging my prostate made me overcome all my comfort zone borders - it reinvigorated me to want to fuck you, at the same time. Feels good to be filled and to fill. Austin: Now you can be my top. Troy: We are boyfriends. I never go to penetrate anyone else. You will have exclusive right to my dick. Austin: But not exclusive right to your arse ? Troy: Please accommodate me. My hole needs so much. Am greedy for anal stimulation. Sometimes Will, eh? Always when you are in mood, please stimulate my anus and prostate. Austin: -----. (contemplating, reflecting internally) Later: Austin: So you are not going to be exclusively mine? You want an open relationship? Troy: Not fully open. You are my protector. I want to have you always with when we have sex with others. And I want to be only with nice other boys. Austin: And I have exclusive rights to you doing penetration. Gee. I thought for longest that I need always to be the top. Troy: Penetrating is not so much within my comfort zone. I want to keep it only with you. Think about it: we have together something exclusive. Troy continues: Did you observe that Travis is a total top. Austin: Yep, this time Travis was. But he is not a full top. Will has indicated that Travis loves to get fucked by Will. Troy: Huh. Travis must therefore have the very stretched arsehole. Could not have guessed it. Should I compare notes with Travis - I am curious how to live with my very stretched arsehole. It is likely to be my future. Though I am wary of allowing any fistfucking. Troy (after a pause): So they have an exclusive thing: Travis permits only Will to fuck him. No one else. This is somehow a mirror-like exclusivity in their partnership. Austin: -----. (contemplating about exclusivities with boyfriend; gathering that he himself had needed sex with Will; reflecting that possibly no gay is going to remain monogamous.) Later: Austin understands that he does no longer need to have sex with Will. All that desire flew away as they had the hours-long foursome. Austin had his fill of Will. However, Austin understands that time after time, Troy needs Will to spice. To avoid any other big-dicked guy to fuck Troy. So, in those situations Austin is going to participate by either fucking Will the same time as Will fucks Troy, or having Troy fucking himself the same time as Will fucks Troy.

I predict Troy loves to get ravished.

probably a foursome. Austin does not want to act without Troy. My guess is that Troy turns soon to be the more eager of this couple to have sex with Travis and Will. My educated guess is about Troy's predictable role in sex. And b/c Austin has that long already desired sex with Will, Austin will go along with Troy's (eager) wishes - though predict that Austin will be a bit disappointed in Troy... I have several very graphic ideas what is going to happen when these four....

yeah

nice.

My thought continues: ... probably K will be very happy after being in the receiving end of Will's big (and thick).

this is a stage when it becomes a necessity that K gets (sexually) done by Will. to demonstrate that K is not going to have Travis.

My perception: It is miraculous if Mr. Pryce is still married with the female whom he married over 17 years ago. Miraculous.

Thank you for posting this chapter on my birthday, the 15th of February.

a simple explanation is that the new Mrs. He's A Cheater wants to make the husband to move his now-unwelcome (sexual) attentions to another female. Sort of retiring from sexual intercourse with the title of wife and the lifestyle of the official wife.

yes, yeah

the current wife of Jackson' father afaik is not Jackson's biological mother. Might well be that snarky Jackson and the snarky stepmother are in agreement in their treatments towards the Male Head of the Household, Mr Pryce. Undoubtedly Mr Pryce is one of those who starts a sex affair with another secretary as soon as he has married his previous mistress, the hitherto secretary. Could well be that the current wife agreed to marry Mr Pryce as she wanted to get rid of sex life with the nauseous Mr Pryce and was sure that Mr Pryce will not be sexually interested in a wife: for her, the wedding was a way to end all sex life with her boss, Mr Pryce, and the answer to her hopes that developed when she was secretary.

I foresee that at this stage, some other member of the staff, or the director himself, just goes to explain Derek Greer that the Medusa's personnel skills are non-existent and that Medusa's behavior has started to disrupt the work and the working atmosphere too seriously. Even if Travis had been reticent in his commonplace chats with his co-workers and cameramen and such, still I suspect that Travis had once or twice happened to mention "Uncle Brad" whom Travis had known since being an elementary-school kid and Jeremys's classmate and the foster-father of Darius who is a mate of Trevor Big Buck and Brad's kids whom (years ago) the Buck kids met all the time. I can understand (and so can Brad) that a corporation has a need of one with proven ability to get an otherwise lazy project to harden its backbones and to concentrate to accomplishment. But has this project had that sort of need? Was the previous guy an inept manager and had the work produce the started to worsen? (This is surely what Brad wants to know.) The retainment of the Medusa in the company is going to be dependent on whether the Medusa were factually useful for some project, or whether she is too big a disruption for anything. Is the Medusa an overall bad manager? Or suitable for some extreme task in the firm? The Medusa is approx a decade older than Derek and besides Medusa is a female. So, the male boss-level guy who enjoys the services of the Medusa, most likely is not Derek, but one of second-tier bosses. However, if it is Derek, then I believe someone is to suggest that Derek start to employ her as his personal home servant, not in the Bright company. I foresee that soon, in some dinner or other, Brad "innocently" digs Travis (and Will) to talk about his impressions this far about how staff and actors experience their workplace. About who there are good guys and who they feel are bad.

yeah yes

My vote is for Zach. I have always liked young men who have a prostate that makes them sex-fiends.

yay !

That saying, of course, tends to be used (as a saving grace) by those who need saving as they do not understand anything about the actual past nor about avoiding anachronisms, and who usually think that everything that happened in the past, happened all at one moment. It is always desperately and pitiably usual for several people to not grasp that the time passed also in the past. Dates, of course, is a way to keep in mind when something actually happened and when something other happened - and that these two actually were not in the same century. (Just recently, I had discussions with a group of people who had serious problem to remember and grasp the chronological difference between two generations, one of them with floruit in 1450 and the other's floruit in 1550. These two datings seemingly caused sort of blindness and therefore mix-up. Their group's chairperson suggested in the discussion a solution: let's pencil away both these dates! Somehow this suggestion appears to me as a sort of “history isn’t always about dates”, so some people are getting them dates eliminated from their view.) Avoidance of dates generally comes to many people due to their inability to remember dates by heart. But actually, remembering dates is not about remembering them by heart, since dates can be held in (a) written notes, and (b) read from literature.

But they lost the Duchy of Milano. (And their actual rule was not very long. Merely 1277-1447. Less than two centuries.) * Italian city-states tended to be volatile. The Sforza acquired it. Already in the Middle Ages. Since the year 1450. Since 1447, any Visconti has been a mere aristocrat. Not a ruler of a state. They were noble and landowners already in the 1100s. (And, likely descended from slaves of the antiquity whom some Roman or other owned. Italy is full of descendants of freed slaves of ancient Romans.)

hi. wau.

The trust Curtis set up and the role of the law firm partners Arrogant& alii and Fellowes: I fathom there in the USA and in California there is laws and precedents against setting a trust to do criminal deeds. Therefore I surmise that Fellowes and other lawyers in the know are possibly facing criminal prosecution for the crimes they have done against Travis and planned against Travis. Also I suppose that Curtis' this trust is going to be eliminated: possibly confiscated, or verdicted as compensations to Travis for injuries and harms he suffered, or simply liquidated. There is a long list of tort precedents in the US that Travis should utilize as bases of his claims against the late Curtis and thos Trust and against the lawyers who acted to fulfill the criminal designation of the Trust of Torture.

yep !

yes