Mac
Members-
Posts
220 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Stories
- Stories
- Story Series
- Story Worlds
- Story Collections
- Story Chapters
- Chapter Comments
- Story Reviews
- Story Comments
- Stories Edited
- Stories Beta'd
Blogs
Store
Help Center
Writing
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Mac
-
Abuser. -> no sex for him. Nobody should give anything to him. Besides, there is an expectation of some sorts of 1) violence. 2) bodily injuries that cause inability to do abuse in the future. 3) burned skin in certain places, one of them being a part of his scalp. Nothing ever grows anew in those spots and the damaged skin spots always flare red. 4) some cat's paws (or, forest cat's or puma's or leopard's or another creature in that sort of line) shred his penis. 5) kneecaps got already hinted at. In addition, some friendly people could donate to him a thick, vibrating plug or dildo. Just friendly for exercise.
-
The form of the face is something that does not meet my idea of Will's face. Elordi's face resembles that much a weasel-like creature that I do not regard it above the criterion line. Which Balkan ethnicities produce such face forms ? I would expect a somewhat nicer face form.
-
wonder what Will himself looks like in the year 2004 I like willowy young men.
-
Garrett Hedlund.... not good-looking guy. In a 2005 pic of him, my impression is that he is too similar with maize dough or wheat dough. Which is something that predicts a doughy body and face in the future. I just cannot understand why and how anyone would be sexually interested in such looks. Nowadays, of course, Hedlund is not hot. Not even a hot dough from oven.
-
jesus. ! wealthy regions are blue, poverty-stricken regions are red. In the US, it is generally believed that wealthy are intelligent and poor in poverty are dumb.
-
isn't it so that circa 90% of homosexual and bisexual males want to be fucked. In other words, they like anal stimulation. seems to me that getting fucked does not require much of stamina. perhaps, rather merely the lube.
-
in real history, the countess (later the Princess) Lieven, aka Dordi of Benkendorp, started to have children (in her 1800 wedded marriage) only in 1804, not in 1801. And, Dordi's each child (in real history) did not marry or did not have progeny of their own. In real history, her entire progeny ended in extinction in some late-1800s decade. Dordi became Princess Lieven in 1828, when her mother-in-law Charlotte was created a (baltic) Princess by Emperor Nicholas I. Charlotte had been Nicholas' (and several of his siblings') head-nanny in childhood, with the title/position called Governess. Dordi was then 'princess-consort' because her Lieven husband became titled Prince. The Lieven family was originally ethnically Livonian. Then they counted among Baltic aristocracy. Emperor Paul I had created them Counts and Countesses. Dordi's husband, the diplomat, was Kristapas Indrikis Lieven. born as Baron, family raised to Count, and since 1828 Prince. Elevations in one generation. In other words, upstarts and parvenues, until their higher titles became respected after a long while, next century. Dordi herself was not from highly aristocratic family roots. She was born as untitled noble, i.e approximately gentry. Only the marriage made her officially Countess. Instead, her mother (who had come from southern Germany) was a court-maiden of Paul I's wife, the Empress Maria Sophia Dorothea, and the empress' friend from empress' childhood in Ludwigsburg and Montbeliard. When an unmarried courtier of the future empress, she had in 1780 married a Baltic-German (or Finnish-German) noble officer of mediocre-level family. They became sort of favorites of Paul and Maria, the future imperial couple. Thus, Dordi rather belonged to imperial favorites than to established aristocracy. I happen to know Benkendorp family and some of their descendants. Observe that Dordi's father was born in Finland. Dordi's marriage with Lieven is, historically seen, an alliance between two families that both served closely the imperial couple and imperial children (as nannies and courtiers), in the year 1800 (when Paul I reigned and was alive). as now Mark has staged Dordi to give birth already in 1801, perhaps the argument will be that the husband, Lieven, hid such illicitly sired children, and hidden children do not show in later official genealogical tables.
-
Quite funny, to feature Peter Thiel So, now and in future, often when Peter Thiel feels his anus craving, Thiel concocts a new deal for Will and invites Will to seal the lucrative moneymaking investment - by fucking Thiel's insatiable anus with his big big boyish dick. This is beautiful I am sure that Thiel, like what he is and whose like he is, actually is that sort of guy,
-
a justified outcome would be: * Johnny gets to hold the money because his grandma testamented the House to him * Johnny gets to hold the House (paid by monies ultimately chiefly from Patrick) as compensation orf Patrick ripping Johnny's anus and causing physical pain and psychological trauma. Moreover I sincerely hope that Johnny later gets Patrick to tongue Johnny's anus, preferably several different times. That to be the extent of their later sexual relations... I foresee Johnny ultimately finding a boyfriend whose penis is smallish - and then Johnny starts to have anal sex. Without too much pain.
-
a few comments on "weren’t princes like a dime a dozen in Germany back in those days" & “No, Dukes and Counts were a dime a dozen, not princes” & “Besides, he was a Prussian prince" I see that Mark's text has context from English perception of titles, not of continental European perception. In the continental European perception of titles, Dukes are generally higher in hierarchy than princes. That is so in Germany and in Austria, for example. In Germany, "princes and counts" are (and were) like dime a dozen, compared to the much rarer dukes. In England, those who are Princes, are The Prince of Wales, and several other members of the royal family. Being royalty, they are naturally perceived as higher in hierarchy compared with British Dukes. Britain has not doled out to aristocracy the title of Prince, contrary to German and Austrian usages. But, that 'royalty' is not the situation in Austria nor in Germany, generally. In Germany and Austria, there exist and existed a big number of Prinz(es) and Prinzessins, belonging to 'mere' aristocracy. A Prussian prince is not the same as Prince of Prussia. Certain that 'Schulenbergs' were not ever members of the Royal Family of Prussia. "von Schulenberg, a Prussian prince", basically says the hierarchical position of being near the top of aristocracy in Germany in Germany's (northern) half that then was the Kingdom of Prussia. I wager that the Schulenberg were 'latter-day' princes, erected to that title only after Middle Ages, and not holding landed fiefs directly under the Holy Roman Emperor. But just being big landowners in a province that had fallen under the King of Prussia (a kingdom established in the year 1700 and therefore an upstart kingdom among the European older countries). Not holding landed fiefs directly under the Holy Roman Emperor, i.e not being "immediate", is a phenomenon in aristocracy that means those princes were not of 'Hochadel', i.e not of real highest German nobility who usually had their male-line descent from a Lord or princeling living in the 1100s or even earlier. (The days of the Staufen emperors or their ancestors the Salian emperors seem the era when a bunch of old hereditary land of Germany started) When in the start of the 1800s a vast number of German old-line princes (princelings) were mediated to be under local kings, no longer sovereign rulers of small principalities, these began to be respected as highest nobility, although their titles (prince) was outwardly not different than the newre princes. But these newer princes (such as, Schulenberg) were regarded as newer and lower (= more upstart), being not Hochadel. For example, counts of Erbach were regarded higher than Prince Bismarck or Prince Clary-Aldringen. Thus, Will was totally correct in the taunting he uttered, whereas K-Kris had something wrong. Kris surely wants to think his own lineage a bit higher than it really was in the German aristocrat hierarchy.
-
perhaps the choosing was decided by women. So many women vote (often) fat-assed men and such. It is rumoredly a result of Provider Allure. An instinct to favor males who seem to have ability to catch food (for wife and children too). "there is somewhere food as he seems well-fed" there exist gay men too who are susceptible to this instinctive behavior. do I guess correctly that the People magazine's Sexiest Man Alive title is codename of the then Smoking 'Hot' ? Personally, smoking has been something that turns me to aversion, not allure.
-
Then, why did you start discuss Politics? Everyone else were discussing economic phenomena and factors of those economic.
-
Looks like a turkish haysack. By the way, were the Hellenes (the Greek) of antiquity cutely blond and beautiful men? Or, did they already then resemble this sort of turkish bloviates?
-
How ugly. You can keep him. Pls set his head into a a paperbag. Myself, I deplore those ciggie advertisement guys. And their ciggies. Oops. This picture depicts yourself?
-
That is a very clever way of an individual to arrange the personal economy. Yet better is if the homeowner has used, during the 5-year period, all the possibilities, pretexts and excuses to temporary and even longer-term personal individual decreases in amounts required for interest payments and for debt payments. the "rent" would have been thus even lower for such homeowner. (Personal bankruptcy then cleans the individual's slate.) Of course this is damaging to bigger things such as national economy and bank stability, but... (who cares) Results from overarching irresponsibility. All this is of course outcomes of politics. And outcomes of greed. I am trying to remember who were those greedy and those in political power, e.g through 2000-2008. And what are the characteristics these share between each other.
-
just remembered to observe: For a long time, months now, possibly year... Will has not needed a dildo. This is a very rare situation for a gay college student. (Dildoes are usually needed very often...) Demonstrates that Will is very privileged in terms of receiving sex and its weekly amount. And, by his very own merits in the field (of sex life), Will has deserved it.
-
just perhaps Will's future specialty (quite possibly as valued academic) would be: psychological economics. Psychoeconomics.
-
the clever Will has of course already liquidated his ownership of Tesla a few years ago. When Tesla yet was relatively in high. Likely at the time when Elon Musk started to amass unreasonably big bonus promises from Tesla. Surely Will is no longer under threat, and will not suffer at all when Tesla's value giies now downhill b/c boycotts against Musk and when Tesla nears bankruptcy in the future. I can see through my soul's eyes how Will is visible among those who condemn Musk. No one of civilized persons can tolerate Musk's animosity against gender dysphoria, for example. That's Will.
-
My bet is that the furtherance sets the Director to a very other type of situation and that harassment by him does not continue. I believe Will makes the encounter different: either the Director gets (chemically or by cutting) permanently impotent (the penis will always be soft and loose, never again hard or erect) or he starts to give enthusiastically his arse to boys. There will be no assault either from the Director or personally from Travis. (However, enforcers who protect Travis, might assault the Director with cutting scalpels and/or chemical toxins, if the Director continues with attempts to harass.) One of nameless enforcers could be named Tim. Paid to administer necessary toxins into the body of the Director.
-
Just perhaps, in the big encounter as boys fuck the Director in turns, towards the end of the sexual interaction, the assertive Travis gets the Director to tongue Travis' hole. I foresee a reckoning coming, knowing Will: a reckoning that changes forever how the Director dares to treat any kind of boys in the casting coach. I believe it is an impossibility that Will won't now make arrangements (with Stef and with Jake and with private enforcers).
-
You are saying that the Director actually is a rapist and molester. that the Director has that sort of psyche. Well, the Director needs to be retrained. Travis, with Will's family's support, is in position to retrain the Director. I am sure that the Producer Company of this soap opera will be very ready and very fast to replace the Director with another director, if that turns out to be necessary. (And, do not forget that there works a Ninja as physical protection of Travis. In a bad scenario, the current Director may get ninjaed.)
-
Ah. What then is Evelyn's current title ? Btw, as I learned years ago, a company is obliged to name one person as its CEO in the official register. Pesky thing (that is called 'law') requires it. Pesky laws do not leave the option of three co-equal CEOs, two of them are by necessity mere Deputy CEOs. Guessing who the current CEO person is.
-
I anticipate that the assertive Travis finds that the Director melts purringly in Travis' arms in their very next encounter. The Director finally gets what he really needs. And his answer is a request for thick dicks from the very start. Young male dicks to fill anus. Of course the Director then wants boys to return to stimulate his sphincter muscles and prostate. But Travis could arrange other interested gay boys to make visits: I think the Director's bedroom is going to be like a revolving door and have visitors like in the 1720s-1730s the Grand Duke Gian Gastone of Tuscany had in his bed in the Palazzo Pitti in Firenze of Italia. Ultimately, the Director's arse is going to be like a revolving door.
