Mac

My thought continues: ... probably K will be very happy after being in the receiving end of Will's big (and thick).

this is a stage when it becomes a necessity that K gets (sexually) done by Will. to demonstrate that K is not going to have Travis.

My perception: It is miraculous if Mr. Pryce is still married with the female whom he married over 17 years ago. Miraculous.

Thank you for posting this chapter on my birthday, the 15th of February.

a simple explanation is that the new Mrs. He's A Cheater wants to make the husband to move his now-unwelcome (sexual) attentions to another female. Sort of retiring from sexual intercourse with the title of wife and the lifestyle of the official wife.

yes, yeah

the current wife of Jackson' father afaik is not Jackson's biological mother. Might well be that snarky Jackson and the snarky stepmother are in agreement in their treatments towards the Male Head of the Household, Mr Pryce. Undoubtedly Mr Pryce is one of those who starts a sex affair with another secretary as soon as he has married his previous mistress, the hitherto secretary. Could well be that the current wife agreed to marry Mr Pryce as she wanted to get rid of sex life with the nauseous Mr Pryce and was sure that Mr Pryce will not be sexually interested in a wife: for her, the wedding was a way to end all sex life with her boss, Mr Pryce, and the answer to her hopes that developed when she was secretary.

I foresee that at this stage, some other member of the staff, or the director himself, just goes to explain Derek Greer that the Medusa's personnel skills are non-existent and that Medusa's behavior has started to disrupt the work and the working atmosphere too seriously. Even if Travis had been reticent in his commonplace chats with his co-workers and cameramen and such, still I suspect that Travis had once or twice happened to mention "Uncle Brad" whom Travis had known since being an elementary-school kid and Jeremys's classmate and the foster-father of Darius who is a mate of Trevor Big Buck and Brad's kids whom (years ago) the Buck kids met all the time. I can understand (and so can Brad) that a corporation has a need of one with proven ability to get an otherwise lazy project to harden its backbones and to concentrate to accomplishment. But has this project had that sort of need? Was the previous guy an inept manager and had the work produce the started to worsen? (This is surely what Brad wants to know.) The retainment of the Medusa in the company is going to be dependent on whether the Medusa were factually useful for some project, or whether she is too big a disruption for anything. Is the Medusa an overall bad manager? Or suitable for some extreme task in the firm? The Medusa is approx a decade older than Derek and besides Medusa is a female. So, the male boss-level guy who enjoys the services of the Medusa, most likely is not Derek, but one of second-tier bosses. However, if it is Derek, then I believe someone is to suggest that Derek start to employ her as his personal home servant, not in the Bright company. I foresee that soon, in some dinner or other, Brad "innocently" digs Travis (and Will) to talk about his impressions this far about how staff and actors experience their workplace. About who there are good guys and who they feel are bad.

yeah yes

My vote is for Zach. I have always liked young men who have a prostate that makes them sex-fiends.

yay !

That saying, of course, tends to be used (as a saving grace) by those who need saving as they do not understand anything about the actual past nor about avoiding anachronisms, and who usually think that everything that happened in the past, happened all at one moment. It is always desperately and pitiably usual for several people to not grasp that the time passed also in the past. Dates, of course, is a way to keep in mind when something actually happened and when something other happened - and that these two actually were not in the same century. (Just recently, I had discussions with a group of people who had serious problem to remember and grasp the chronological difference between two generations, one of them with floruit in 1450 and the other's floruit in 1550. These two datings seemingly caused sort of blindness and therefore mix-up. Their group's chairperson suggested in the discussion a solution: let's pencil away both these dates! Somehow this suggestion appears to me as a sort of “history isn’t always about dates”, so some people are getting them dates eliminated from their view.) Avoidance of dates generally comes to many people due to their inability to remember dates by heart. But actually, remembering dates is not about remembering them by heart, since dates can be held in (a) written notes, and (b) read from literature.

But they lost the Duchy of Milano. (And their actual rule was not very long. Merely 1277-1447. Less than two centuries.) * Italian city-states tended to be volatile. The Sforza acquired it. Already in the Middle Ages. Since the year 1450. Since 1447, any Visconti has been a mere aristocrat. Not a ruler of a state. They were noble and landowners already in the 1100s. (And, likely descended from slaves of the antiquity whom some Roman or other owned. Italy is full of descendants of freed slaves of ancient Romans.)

hi. wau.

The trust Curtis set up and the role of the law firm partners Arrogant& alii and Fellowes: I fathom there in the USA and in California there is laws and precedents against setting a trust to do criminal deeds. Therefore I surmise that Fellowes and other lawyers in the know are possibly facing criminal prosecution for the crimes they have done against Travis and planned against Travis. Also I suppose that Curtis' this trust is going to be eliminated: possibly confiscated, or verdicted as compensations to Travis for injuries and harms he suffered, or simply liquidated. There is a long list of tort precedents in the US that Travis should utilize as bases of his claims against the late Curtis and thos Trust and against the lawyers who acted to fulfill the criminal designation of the Trust of Torture.

yep !

yes

well...

wow

yeah

wau

yeah

My early prediction was that the successful meds will make Jeremy to fatten in a velocity that soon he resembles a balloon. Dimensions of predicted Jeremy: shorter than wide. Width (as to stomach level): almost 6 feet (about 180 cm). Has this prediction come true?

why would Jeremy not like to be a Crampton, if it comes to that ? Is Jeremy really such a heritage and family guy that he does not want to possess individualist identity. even without Jim Crampton as his bio sire, Jeremy is a direct Crampton descendant, by blood: Jeremy - Bitty Schluter - Billy Schluter - Gail Tonto née Crampton - Alexander Crampton. and, even without Brad Schluter as foster-father, Jeremy is always a Schluter, by blood: Jeremy - Bitty Schluter - Billy Schluter - judge Barry Schluter, in his time the Head of Agnatic Family of Schluter. Jeremy is son of Bitty, herself daughter of Billy Schluter who was the sole uncle of the childless Stef Schluter who has no siblings.

sharp...