Niwa Fox Rose

Mine would be INTP. very expressed introvert distinctively expressed intuitive personality slightly expressed thinking personality slightly expressed perceiving personality Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving 78 62 1 22

Music - It would probably would have to be Mathew Ebel right now. <3 Art - Would have to be Picasso. Acting - *shrugs* I don't pay attention to acting. Johny Depp is awesome though. <3 Literature (Just thought I'd add this. ;D) - That would be Andre Gide, Hawthorne, Christopher Hitchens, and Richard Dawkins.

>.< I just got owned.

Awww, good bye cuteness.

I actually never new that. My teacher said that Firefox was the best browser for web standards. I also though Opera was dieing. *goes and downloads Opera*

Then, we could change evolution to development? Changing the Physical Argument and Emotional Argument into Physical and Emotional Conflict? Each definition would still apply, and this theory wouldn't have to be changed much.

Um...The knowledge that you can think about things outside the box?

You win!

You have to think outside the box. ;D

Well, for the last four days I've been developing a technique for arguing. This technique is for setting up the argument in a well structured manner, and always focuses about gaining the upper hand in the argument. However, developing this technique has left me pondering about the evolution of argument. Of course, this left me to create my own, so I think, theory. Under is the theory that I have developed. ~~~~ When you look at society's definition of argument this topic is almost non-existent, lets look at the definition I've obtained from an average member of society: "Argument is when two opposing living things have conflict." Sounds simple enough, and boring to boot! We have to split up argument into three different categories: Physical, Emotional, and Intellectual. Then we must define each of those categories. Physical Argument: This is the type of argument that the world started out on. When to life forces (any living thing) had a conflict with another, they simply would use an act of violence on them. This is when Emotional Argument began to develop. Emotional Argument: This is the type of argument that existed when the first humans appeared. When they had a conflict with another they simple would scream and shout useless tidbits of their language not getting at a point. The loser was the one who stopped yelling first. This is when Intellectual Argument began to develop. Intellectual Argument: This is the type of argument that exists today. We use thought out opinions and compose contrasting views to prove our point when in conflict with another. When we look at those categories and definitions the topic exists; The Theory of Evolution of Argument. ~~~~ Interesting, right? Of course I ran into some sort of a problem. Some people say I'm looking at the theory of conflict, not argument. So, what would you have to say? ~~~~ Another interesting thing. If this theory is correct, then another question I have for you guys. We, as humans, use intellectual argument on a daily basis. However, I have noticed that it is more common, in average society, to use emotional argument. If that is true, then we must be going through a de-evolution process of argument. What does that have to say about our species? Is our species going through de-evolution? Or is the de-evolution of argument caused by the lower literacy standards in today's society?

I only like peperjack, provolone, and Munster cheese. ;D

Okay, so here is a little brain teaser. I'll reveal the answer later on. ~~~~~~ In a horse race there are nine stables, but ten horses. How can you fit ten horses in nine stables? ~~~~~ That's it! ^^

Well, I'm usually on the computer four to six hours a day. Most of my hobbies are very technology related. Web Design, I'm learning Java Programing, Photoshop, etc. I'm annoyed when my computer has a problem and I can't use it because it stops productivity and I feel the need to fix it right then and there. I have my own desktop computer which is seven years old, and for Christmas I got a nice laptop. ^^

Well I use Vista, but I prefer OS X leopard. It just worked better during my Electronic Music class I took. I miss those Macs! D:

Well I use Internet Explorer 8, Firefox, Safari, and Google Chrome on a daily basis because of my love of Web Design. They all have their perks...Except Internet Explorer... Firefox is the fastest. Safari is the best to organize bookmarks. I love how each tab is it's own process. But, all in all firefox will remain in my heart as the best browser. <3

I am a sad condom who likes to eat crotches. I am a tame baby who likes to devour camels. I am a large breasted pinup model who likes to break trees. Forgot my laughing face -- > xD

Whoa. O.o It's been a while since I read the book, I had no idea such essential parts were left out!

I just got home from the movie, and I must say it was quite amazing! It even had is funny parts, like when Ron was staring up at the moon after he drank that love potion. xD As said earlier it was rushed and they cut out a lot of good parts. But that happens in all book movies. *shrugs* So it really shouldn't surprise you.

I'd support that. We need more diversity in here! x3

One of my absolute favorites is Zeromancer's Dr. Online. I find them to be attractive as well. Got to love the lighter Cyber Goth style. <3

Sounds reasonable.

I'd beg to differ, Pepsi is where it's at. ;D

I never knew that about KSL. I knew it was biased, but not owned by the LDS church. God! Is nothing owned by the LDS church. D:

Actually I posted an article from KSL. Which is a main stream new media...Well at least in Utah. ;D

Ooh~ Gotcha.