Niwa Fox Rose

Mine would be INTP. very expressed introvert distinctively expressed intuitive personality slightly expressed thinking personality slightly expressed perceiving personality Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving 78 62 1 22

Music - It would probably would have to be Mathew Ebel right now. <3 Art - Would have to be Picasso. Acting - *shrugs* I don't pay attention to acting. Johny Depp is awesome though. <3 Literature (Just thought I'd add this. ;D) - That would be Andre Gide, Hawthorne, Christopher Hitchens, and Richard Dawkins.

>.< I just got owned.

Awww, good bye cuteness.

I actually never new that. My teacher said that Firefox was the best browser for web standards. I also though Opera was dieing. *goes and downloads Opera*

Then, we could change evolution to development? Changing the Physical Argument and Emotional Argument into Physical and Emotional Conflict? Each definition would still apply, and this theory wouldn't have to be changed much.

Well, for the last four days I've been developing a technique for arguing. This technique is for setting up the argument in a well structured manner, and always focuses about gaining the upper hand in the argument. However, developing this technique has left me pondering about the evolution of argument. Of course, this left me to create my own, so I think, theory. Under is the theory that I have developed. ~~~~ When you look at society's definition of argument this topic is almost non-existent, lets look at the definition I've obtained from an average member of society: "Argument is when two opposing living things have conflict." Sounds simple enough, and boring to boot! We have to split up argument into three different categories: Physical, Emotional, and Intellectual. Then we must define each of those categories. Physical Argument: This is the type of argument that the world started out on. When to life forces (any living thing) had a conflict with another, they simply would use an act of violence on them. This is when Emotional Argument began to develop. Emotional Argument: This is the type of argument that existed when the first humans appeared. When they had a conflict with another they simple would scream and shout useless tidbits of their language not getting at a point. The loser was the one who stopped yelling first. This is when Intellectual Argument began to develop. Intellectual Argument: This is the type of argument that exists today. We use thought out opinions and compose contrasting views to prove our point when in conflict with another. When we look at those categories and definitions the topic exists; The Theory of Evolution of Argument. ~~~~ Interesting, right? Of course I ran into some sort of a problem. Some people say I'm looking at the theory of conflict, not argument. So, what would you have to say? ~~~~ Another interesting thing. If this theory is correct, then another question I have for you guys. We, as humans, use intellectual argument on a daily basis. However, I have noticed that it is more common, in average society, to use emotional argument. If that is true, then we must be going through a de-evolution process of argument. What does that have to say about our species? Is our species going through de-evolution? Or is the de-evolution of argument caused by the lower literacy standards in today's society?

I only like peperjack, provolone, and Munster cheese. ;D

Well, I'm usually on the computer four to six hours a day. Most of my hobbies are very technology related. Web Design, I'm learning Java Programing, Photoshop, etc. I'm annoyed when my computer has a problem and I can't use it because it stops productivity and I feel the need to fix it right then and there. I have my own desktop computer which is seven years old, and for Christmas I got a nice laptop. ^^

Well I use Vista, but I prefer OS X leopard. It just worked better during my Electronic Music class I took. I miss those Macs! D:

Well I use Internet Explorer 8, Firefox, Safari, and Google Chrome on a daily basis because of my love of Web Design. They all have their perks...Except Internet Explorer... Firefox is the fastest. Safari is the best to organize bookmarks. I love how each tab is it's own process. But, all in all firefox will remain in my heart as the best browser. <3

Whoa. O.o It's been a while since I read the book, I had no idea such essential parts were left out!

I just got home from the movie, and I must say it was quite amazing! It even had is funny parts, like when Ron was staring up at the moon after he drank that love potion. xD As said earlier it was rushed and they cut out a lot of good parts. But that happens in all book movies. *shrugs* So it really shouldn't surprise you.

I'd support that. We need more diversity in here! x3

One of my absolute favorites is Zeromancer's Dr. Online. I find them to be attractive as well. Got to love the lighter Cyber Goth style. <3

Sounds reasonable.

I'd beg to differ, Pepsi is where it's at. ;D

I never knew that about KSL. I knew it was biased, but not owned by the LDS church. God! Is nothing owned by the LDS church. D:

Actually I posted an article from KSL. Which is a main stream new media...Well at least in Utah. ;D

Ooh~ Gotcha.

That's where I was getting at. xD Yes, they were in the right when it comes to the law. However the couple was singled out because they were gay. Which is why I'm complaining. x3

Okay guys, here's another article. Mind you that this one has a bias as does the one for queerty. I'll try to find the link to the two guy's blog. SALT LAKE CITY -- Two men say they were singled out and treated unfairly by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint because they're gay. Salt Lake City police arrested the two for trespassing when they were asked to leave the Church's Main Street Plaza but refused to do so. On Thursday night, Derek Jones and his boyfriend, Matt, walked through the plaza holding hands. One reportedly kissed the other, and that's when security guards asked them to leave. "We were called at about 10:25 p.m. by LDS security to come over to their property where two males were in custody for refusing to leave the property," explained Salt Lake police Sgt. Robin Snyder said. The couple was cited for trespassing. Snyder says the law allows the owner of a property to kick someone out for any reason. "A property owner has the right to ask someone to leave their property. If they do not leave that property, then they have violated an ordinance, a Salt Lake City ordinance, which is trespassing. So, the police became involved," Snyder said. The Church released a statement saying the couple was "asked to stop engaging in inappropriate behavior just as any other couple would have been. They became argumentative and used profanity and refused to leave the property. They were arrested and then given a citation for criminal trespass by SLPD." "If this is a public place, such as a park, that's a whole different story," Snyder said. But Jones paints a different picture. In a blog, Jones wrote: "This especially irked the both of us because having walked through on a frequent basis (we often walk to work through there) and every time I have been through there are either marriage ceremonies going on, young Mormon couples cuddling in front the fountain, hugging, holding hands, etc. "Matt then tried to get them to admit they were singling us out because they just didn't approve of 'gay' public displays of affection, baiting them into revealing their bigotry." Courtesy of ksl.com Also remember, where they were standing is used for the public as the other article stated.

Like I've said, I've been to that place lots of times. I've seen lots of straight couples kissing and the security guards did nothing about them. Yes, they were in the legal right to do this. I still think they were singled out because they were gay.

It was the LDS security guards that called the police in the first place.