Jump to content
  • entries
    644
  • comments
    1,625
  • views
    386,668

Astronomers Insight on How Massive Stars Form


Astronomers Gain Important Insight on How Massive Stars Form

National Radio Astronomy Observatory

Press Release

September 27th, 2006

Source Link

 

Astronomers using the National Science Foundation's Very Large Array (VLA) radio telescope have discovered key evidence that may help them figure out how very massive stars can form.

 

"We think we know how stars like the Sun are formed, but there are major problems in determining how a star 10 times more massive than the Sun can accumulate that much mass. The new observations with the VLA have provided important clues to resolving that mystery," said Maria Teresa Beltran, of the University of Barcelona in Spain.

 

Beltran and other astronomers from Italy and Hawaii studied a young, massive star called G24 A1 about 25,000 light-years from Earth. This object is about 20 times more massive than the Sun. The scientists reported their findings in the September 28 issue of the journal Nature.

 

Stars form when giant interstellar clouds of gas and dust collapse gravitationally, compacting the material into what becomes the star. While astronomers believe they understand this process reasonably well for smaller stars, the theoretical framework ran into a hitch with larger stars.

 

"When a star gets up to about eight times the mass of the Sun, it pours out enough light and other radiation to stop the further infall of material," Beltran explained. "We know there are many stars bigger than that, so the question is, how do they get that much mass?"

 

One idea is that infalling matter forms a disk whirling around the star. With most of the radiation escaping without hitting the disk, material can continue to fall into the star from the disk. According to this model, some material will be flung outward along the rotation axis of the disk into powerful outflows.

 

"If this model is correct, there should be material falling inward, rushing outward and rotating around the star all at the same time," Beltran said. "In fact, that's exactly what we saw in G24 A1. It's the first time all three types of motion have been seen in a single young massive star," she added.

 

The scientists traced motions in gas around the young star by studying radio waves emitted by ammonia molecules at a frequency near 23 GHz. The Doppler shift in the frequency of the radio waves gave them the information on the motions of the gas. This technique allowed them to detect gas falling inward toward a large "doughnut," or torus, surrounding the disk presumed to be orbiting the young star.

 

"Our detection of gas falling inward toward the star is an important milestone," Beltran said. The infall of the gas is consistent with the idea of material accreting onto the star in a non-spherical manner, such as in a disk. This supports that idea, which is one of several proposed ways for massive stars to accumulate their great bulk. Others include collisions of smaller stars.

 

"Our findings suggest that the disk model is a plausible way to make stars up to 20 times the mass of the Sun. We'll continue to study G24 A1 and other objects to improve our understanding," Beltran said.

 

Beltran worked with Riccardo Cesaroni and Leonardo Testi of the Astrophysical Observatory of Arcetri of INAF in Firenze, Italy, Claudio Codella and Luca Olmi of the Institute of Radioastronomy of INAF in Firenze, Italy, and Ray Furuya of the Japanese Subaru Telescope in Hawaii.

 

The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation, operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.

 

2006-0927formation.jpg

Artist's Conception of Young Star Showing Motions Detected in G24 A1:(1) Infall toward torus, (2) Rotation and (3) outflow.

 

 

 

Note: Giant stars (25+ solar masses) are something of an enigma. How they form vs how other stars form has been a riddle that scientists studying stellar evolution have been looking into for years.

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

C James

Posted

James, thank you again for another great article!

 

I wonder, though, if they are missing something here?

 

My first objection is to the notion of the star pulling matter into a planar disk that rotates around the star. The laws of orbital mechanics argue strongly against that. Gravitational attraction would tend to pull in matter from all directions equally, and in order to enter orbit in a rotating belt as indicated, the debris would need to approach the star at an angle, AND be imparted some very significant delta/v at perihelion.

 

My personal take on all this is that there is indeed a belt of orbiting matter (a proto solar system) but that the matter influx can overcome the star's radiation pressure by mass: They are assuming for their model that the matter is at the near-molecular level (otherwise it would not be repelled by radiation pressure for a star of that size) but what basis is there for assuming that mass distribution? None.

 

On the other hand, we have the example of our own kuyper belt and Oort cloud. Much of the matter there is in larger structures (proto comets, etc) that very easily could overcome the star's radiation pressure.

 

So, I think, in my not-so-humble opinion, that they got it partially right: there is indeed a ring of particulate matter in orbit of the star, and that explains their observed data (including the ejectile matter at the stellar poles). However, matter beginning to fall further inwards from that ring still has the delta/v issue: it's in orbit around the star, and would be even more susceptible (due to it's relative delta/v and the resulting greater time of exposure to the radiation pressure) to the radiation pressure once between the star and the belt (and thus no longer shielded by the belt).

 

The matter influx would thus primarily be by objects having sufficient mass for the gravity of the star to have a greater effect that radiation pressure (even masses smaller than a grain of sand would be sufficient.)

 

For objects consisting of mainly hydrogen and helium, they would need to be larger, so that the heat from the star would not turn the mass into monomolecular gas prior to a close enough approach for gravitational capture of said gas. One effect of this mechanism would be to significantly increase the percentage of heavier elements in the later-stage mass infalls.

 

One other item overlooked in the article: radiation pressure is not sufficient at extremely short ranges to overcome the star's gravity even on gas, otherwise large stars could not exist (they would drive off their own coronas and quickly lose their mass).

JamesSavik

Posted

There is another force that I don't think has been factored in: magnetism. A stars magnetic field plays a huge role during its lifetime.

 

I remember reading a theory about planetesimals forming along magnetic lines of force. We know quite a lot about the effects of gravity and magnetism but we've still got a lot to learn.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...