Enric

ch30: oh my. would he need to sink as low as to have heterosex...? how evilly funnily the americans (of today) are characterized... 'most of them are tories' (that is obviously a synonym for 'republican', or possibly 'asshole'), 'they amount to nothing', 'full of hypocrisy' such an american truth

well, we have still lots of steps pretty available. Next would come 'Captain Granger' then 'Captain Granger in the Baltic' then 'Captain Granger and clones of East'... burp. Or, these sort of rubrics could go on and on and on - just as Tarzan (the Rt.Hon Lord Greystoke) kept finding yet one lost people or town more all the time. but available is also 'Admiral Granger and corsairs of hell', or at least something of 'Admiral Granger' then, our Granger does not need to supplant the king just in order to advance from captaincy, or even admiralty. He could become 'Ambassador Granger' besides evil smiley; it could happen that Granger gets sent to Canada - and that book would no doubt be titled 'Captain Granger and Apes of North' oops. I must have been thinking too much about that 'King of Apes' Other things which do not mean Granger need to supplant anyone, are a title of peerage

ch29: Quite kind I seem to not like Hammond. He, btw, is a Brit, not an American. Pierce. well. feels like incest, if one were to have sex with such a guy who had it with grandfather... btw, in those times as there were no systematical pension system, servants of elderly persons were always currying favor of potential younger employers. Mark possibly has that in mind...

ch21: this felt so full of animalistic sex ------------------ I want to have.... err, to see sex between Carrswold and Danfield..... Mark, kindly appease. Danfield is just such guy who's right for being nicely gay-sexual.

ch28: remarkable luck

ch20: Matt is really f**ked up in the Cody department. dunno what could ever be done ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- btw: Mark M, on 21 October 2009 - 05:57 PM, said: Actually i got to blow my best friend and it was fine, course now i can't convince him to let me do it agaiN!!! Posted Today, 02:07 AM you understand this is not exactly an advertisement about your blowing skills perhaps our Mark is better in some other departments of service... how about anal sex

you understand this is not exactly an advertisement about your blowing skills

in our street today, we had a boy whom his pals had bribed to make a run around the block naked. In this cold weather. a thirteen year old boy. Quite obviously already of somewhat fertile age, from the look of things and budding muscles and suchlike. And how dumb a boy: to do something like that just because of pals encourage.... nice-looking, though.

ch27: it feels like music

being a Countess is -for them- after all just an inherited title. Inherited titles were nice in their view*, but there was a certain dose of appreciation for a family of good roots to have its head as a leading official in something..... such as, admiral, or general (these could have a command in London, or something as Lord of Admiralty or something), or ambassador (but an ambassador has to be abroad with his family, so Caro possibly does not look forward to that), or chancellor of something,... Wives of ambassadors had it nice when their hubbies were retired and back in London, but Caro is not going to wait for that long... Self-made men in such positions (and their families) did not enjoy all that, only some. But the combination of ancestry as good or better than anyone's and a high position, that's something which made the wife as a leader of her social circles. Caro started well: her own roots were not ancient (although they are acceptable, good if helped a bit), but she snatched the husband whose roots are such that no one there has outright better. Now she needs to make George as admiral, Sea Lord; or general being commandant of a key fortification nearby, or something such. * remember that a hundred of other ladies also have a husband with an inherited title of the same level. The title is no sufficient means to rise *above* others. Not even Ducal title, because there were twenty other dukes and their duchesses. BUT, a high position with real good roots - then also a title will be forthcoming.

ch18: ewww, heterosex somehow the mere thought is revolting thanks Tiger for doing the bottom role

ch26: well, he went and single-handedly obtained an island....

miraculously, the pecking order itself is correct. But some of these terms, well, you succeeded in mis-spelling them.... duchess marchioness Britain does not have count. all those there are Earl the earl's eldest son is *styled* by using the next-highest title of that very earl. It usually is viscount. but not always. and, it is a style only: the father still holds also the viscountcy, the eldest son only may use it as courtesy title - this means that the said eldest son is not yet summoned to the House of Lords

ch17: what sacrifices one has to make....

ch25: this is frightening

ch16: well, looks like a cavalcade of 'college experience'

ch24: I am very amazed if the grandfather really had never seen his grandson - even if they lived in 1700s when travel was not so easy. In these about 20 years, the grandpa would -for example in course of his official duties- be visiting England at a few occasions. and, the Earl and Counress really had not all these years always something keeping them from travelling. They did not even have a steady 'job'. Rather, in some past year, the family woould have taken a voyage to see the grandpa.

I have an inkling where the character 'KonRad' got his name from....

ch15: Mark is so much disliking the character Brian. ------ btw, the late Jeff was Matt's great-uncle, not his cousin. observe that if Jeffoe lived, in 1998 he would been between 50 and 60, I thnk.

ch23: hint: in the neighborhood, there's the island of St.Barthelemy (in Swedish, Bertils-ön, öar, Skt.Bertils), which at this time belongs to the king of Sweden - and there are boound to be Swedish officers on duty. ----------------- btw: I wonder: why do not these Bridgemonts have their own some family legend. Of descent from some ancient heir, or from some king. Or both. I mean, every other brit noble family did, and they spouted their make-believe myth remorselessly...

you are heartily welcome to roflol.... This is just because of my altruistic tendencies.... kindness towards bottoms Iirc, Tiger published a fact that he is mostly a bottom. I was simply thinking about the needs (because, needs were the topic of the talk initiated by Tiger) of fat, or ugly, or aged bottoms. It is well known that such bottoms are not popular among real-life tops..... to the extent that such bottoms actually are pretty deprived of sex. I have heard about vibrators and dildoes those described bottoms of course often use such. my vision about the helping equipmt for those bottoms is something like a drilling machine.... whole-body machine, if such could be developed ------ btw, please! no sex with rats. pretty please.

after a lot of vicissitudes in these posts, I try to catch what it actually is what Tiger needs. I gather that Tiger reported: "need to have a good angry f**k to ease the tension. ...needs Matt's cock... just one-on-one, not gently but animalistically." so, the need seems to be: angry series of anal penetrations, big 'rooster', one-on-one, animalistically, not gently, to ease tension - and, well, that's a recipe - a recipe a sworn bottom presents. absolutely. well, Mark, you will -literally- have your hands full. Heavily full. As someone needs, and it also requires stamina. btw, how about a mechanic equipment to be developed for that purpose ? a machine which keeps some needy bottoms satisfied. which provides staminaed angry f**ks. voluminous demand will forthcome from fat, or ugly, or aged bottoms.

Mark, I think your ambiguous reply, is not going to be comprehended by such people who are careless readers, uncritical, and prone to follow their own wishful thinking...

historical fiction is funny in its way, and difficult to some authors/ plotters. I remember forever a TV series, fictional family in national history, where one character was made to be nimble saboteur in enemy service, when he must by necessity been around 70 years old, and certaily well over 60. A plotter in that writing had not realized how the years passed, and that no one remains a young man all his life.... The pinpoint was that the guy was mentioned as having gone to village school with another character in their youth, they being in same class, and born in the same (or near) year. That birth year was easily determined to be in early 1870s. Okay, then this communist guy was active in communist activities in 1890s (fled from military conscription to the great haven of slurks, = US america), then he returned to be with socialist labor propagandists in the first general election 1906.... that's pretty good, he was of suitable age. Then he was with red troops of the civil war in 1918, a boss there - okay, middle years man, it suits still. nothing too nimble in those efforts. Then he had to flee to soviet union. Observe that in 1920s, he was in his fifties already. but then comes the incredible: the story plotter did not realize he could not plausibly be used in the 1939 war, or afterwards in the war years 1941-44: problematically, the plotter continued to use the same guy as ilfiltrator in the societ service, and had him (already seventy or late 60s) to come surreptititously to his native country, being nimble in cloak-and-dagger department, and setting up some sabotage, such as explosions of industry and some fortifications, during the wars - which did not start before 1939. I named the guy as 'Steely Geezer' because of such a fate.

by the way, I have all the time sub-consciously wondered how and why would a GENUINE englishman of 1700s, receive the baptismal name Albert. In other words, the name choice for georgie's wastrel brother, smacks of some relative implausubility or unusualness. The name Albert, really, came to wider use in Britain in wake of the Prince-Consort Albert, gradually after he HAD married to britain in late 1830s. after that, all sorts of people started to baptize their some son as albert. earlier (such as, in our guys' birth range, around the year 1770), Albert was pretty rare. and most aristocratic families were traditional in a sense that they did not bother to give unprecedented names to their sons, instead they circulated their existing onomastical fund - where the existence of Albert in that century was more like a miracle than anything usual. I am not saying that albert were a totally impossible name in that era, just rare. The name WAS known in the continent, it was no new concoction in the christendom, instead it had long traditions in Germany. * it is just that not usually English aristocracy of that time bothered to ape for example Germans. ---- a more realistic onomastical view for this fictional family, as it is presented, would be that they would advertise their royal Stuart blood (coming from the Countess, not her hubby the current Earl), by choosing names of ancestral roylty for their kids. So, if a deviation from earlier Bridgemont namings would occurred for any of the kids of this Countess, it rather would have such names as: James, Charles, Robert, Alexander, Matthew, Alan, David, Henry, Edward, Richard