Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    35
  • comments
    87
  • views
    19,710

News Programs and Do you Still Watch?

Sign in to follow this  
Jason Rimbaud

174 views

Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, AP, BBC America, CBS, ABC, we could go on for paragraphs just listing the different news programs in this country alone.

 

About ten years ago, I stopped watching news programs on TV and its probably not the reason many of you might suspect. 

 

Once upon a time, reporters would actually inform you of the current events in your local area as well as over the world. If you missed the nightly news, you would have no way of getting the information until the next day.

 

There was no spin, no slant towards a certain agenda, no talking heads telling the viewers what to think or feel about any certain topic. Reporters were hired to give an unbiased view of the news. They were also for the most part a money losing program for the network. It was understood by the executives that the news didn't make money and never made a profit. Instead the news would bring acclaim and prestige to the network which would bring advertisers for the other shows. And for a time, the big three had the most respected anchors in the country.

 

The big three, Dan Rather CBS, Peter Jennings ABC, and Tom Brokaw NBC, ruled the airwaves for over twenty years. They brought a gravitas and respect to their respective networks. 

 

Out of those three, Dan Rather, who from 1980 until the mid 2000's, was arguably the most respected and most watched news anchor in the country. This was before his fall for presenting questionable documents regarding President George Bush's Vietnam service papers.

 

Then Ted Turner came along with his visionary idea called CNN, the very first 24 hour news channel in the early 80's. But it wasn't until the Gulf War when the world first stood up and took notice. For the first time, CNN overtook the big three with an unprecedented scoop. They were the only news outlet to report from inside Iraq during the initial hours of the bombing campaign with live reports from a hotel inside Baghdad.

 

Almost ten years later, CNN would also go down in history as the first cable news channel to report the attack on September 11th showing the first live footage of the plane crashing into the World Trade Center.

 

And with the success of CNN, an Australian publisher, Rupert Murdoch, joined forces with philanthropist, Marvin Davis, to purchase a media company under the banner of 20th Century Fox, to compete with the big three in early 1985. By the third quarter of 1986, Murdoch led the company to earn 5.6 million dollars. In contrast, the year before of the same quarter, there was a 55 million dollar loss. For one of the first times in america, there was profit in the news and people started to notice.

 

Some would say this was the start of the decline of traditional news programming as networks implemented new standard operating procedures to garnish quarterly profits. And those shows that didn't turn a profit, those anchors that couldn't compete with the more sensationalized reporters were slowly replaced. 

 

Now reporters were replaced with personalities pushing narratives the network demands as they started to divide into Republican and Democratic propaganda machines.

 

Traditional reporting was now regulated to newspaper only as networks focused on agendas and pandering to the advertisers. Thus paved the way for internet news shows who dove deeper into partisan politics with overt slants in one direction or the other. As of right now, no matter what side of the political spectrum you follow, you can find bias reporting that only reinforces your worldview and/or opinions.

 

But none of the above reasons are why I stopped watching TV news programs ten years ago.

 

The I-Phone brought a powerful computer in your pocket that gives you real time sources to find any information your heart desires. Why watch the nightly news that teases a story before a commercial break and then makes you wait now sometimes longer than 3 minutes. I just pull out my phone, and get the information from Twitter, Facebook, Google and I get the information without the talking heads spinning some story that happened ten hours earlier.

 

Who still watches news programs and if you do, which ones do you watch in 2019?

  • Like 1
Sign in to follow this  


2 Comments


Recommended Comments

Marty

Posted (edited)

Quote

Why watch the nightly news that teases a story before a commercial break and then makes you wait now sometimes longer than 3 minutes. I just pull out my phone, and get the information from Twitter, Facebook, Google and I get the information without the talking heads spinning some story that happened ten hours earlier.

 

I must admit that I have almost stopped using Facebook over the past three months. The amount of fake news that I was seeing on there just got too much for me, and I found I was simply wasting too much time trying to point out to many of my Facebook 'friends' that much of the so-called news that they were insisting on sharing had no basis in fact, if not deliberately false. I still have my Facebook account, and I do check in once in a while, but I am no longer wasting hours of my life trying to respond to all the nonsense that I see on there. (Maybe that's why I'm being seen on GA again...)

 

The Internet is a wonderful thing, and Social Media can definitely be put to good use. I do sometimes think, however, that the modern younger generation have been somewhat seduced by it. They have become seduced by the idea that news should be available immediately. What does it matter if we sometimes have to wait 'longer than 3 minutes' for a piece of news? What does it matter (unless it's really serious news) if we don't even hear about it until the next day for that matter? I can sometimes go days without even listening to (or reading) the news. It doesn't mean the world is going to end, just because I haven't heard the news. Mostly I catch the news nowadays on the car radio when I am travelling - or someone I meet will tell me about a certain bit of news they found interesting. Maybe I'll even find it interesting myself, in which case I'll look it up when I am next online.

 

Great piece, though, Jason! And yes, I agree with your comments about how mainstream news channels and papers have become commercialised and/or polarised into differing viewpoints or party ideologies. Although the same was true when I first started reading newspapers in the UK nigh on 60 years ago. Even then most newspapers were known to have an editorial team that leaned either heavily to the right or the left. Few of them were genuinely unbiased.

 

Edited by Marty
  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment
5 hours ago, Marty said:

 

I must admit that I have almost stopped using Facebook over the past three months. The amount of fake news that I was seeing on there just got too much for me, and I found I was simply wasting too much time trying to point out to many of my Facebook 'friends' that much of the so-called news that they were insisting on sharing had no basis in fact, if not deliberately false. I still have my Facebook account, and I do check in once in a while, but I am no longer wasting hours of my life trying to respond to all the nonsense that I see on there. (Maybe that's why I'm being seen on GA again...)

 

The Internet is a wonderful thing, and Social Media can definitely be put to good use. I do sometimes think, however, that the modern younger generation have been somewhat seduced by it. They have become seduced by the idea that news should be available immediately. What does it matter if we sometimes have to wait 'longer than 3 minutes' for a piece of news? What does it matter (unless it's really serious news) if we don't even hear about it until the next day for that matter? I can sometimes go days without even listening to (or reading) the news. It doesn't mean the world is going to end, just because I haven't heard the news. Mostly I catch the news nowadays on the car radio when I am travelling - or someone I meet will tell me about a certain bit of news they found interesting. Maybe I'll even find it interesting myself, in which case I'll look it up when I am next online.

 

Great piece, though, Jason! And yes, I agree with your comments about how mainstream news channels and papers have become commercialised and/or polarised into differing viewpoints or party ideologies. Although the same was true when I first started reading newspapers in the UK nigh on 60 years ago. Even then most newspapers were known to have an editorial team that leaned either heavily to the right or the left. Few of them were genuinely unbiased.

 

 

I'm not sure if social media can be put to good use, I rarely use FaceBook, mainly because I don't understand the need to share everything of my life with other people. And I never get my news from Social Media but I do get ideas that cause me to research further into certain narratives.

 

And I do know that newspaper were also heavily editing to craft narratives, especially with Hearst and his assassination against hemp to protect his paper mills. So I know its not a new thing. Its almost impossible to present an unbiased view, we are all structure from our opinions.  

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By William King
      This thread is dedicated to bringing you news about my writing, discussing stuff, and anything you want to say here rather than in story comments, about my books. You know, the things like: that didn't seem real, hated that bit, how did you/could you write that, what next?
       
      I typed in WKW as a snappy title, the spell check kept changing it to WOW! That's okay I guess, I don't have any problems with WOW! Anyway, I would love to interact with anyone who wants to, and if not, that's fine too. I will be checking back here from time to time to let you know what's going on.
       
      So what is going on? I was very fortunate to find a great editor for Refugee, and now that we have almost completed the re-edit, I am starting to publish it. The book appears as a new story, for the publicity, well perhaps. But, it was always intended as one single book, in four parts, which is really why it is getting published a fresh.
       
      Rompecabezas I wrote way back in 2016. I say, way back, because I've learnt a whole lot about how to write since then. Which has prompted me to edit and proof read the book. This is so I don't cringe at the errors I made back then. I still make mistakes, but hopefully less with the practice I've had. The book gets published with the new edition over the old, so you need to follow the story if you want up dates, it won't appear as a new book.
       
      That's all for now good people, happy reading. 
    • By Former Member
      6 Things I Need My (Gay) Son to Understand
      By Patrick Roth (Huffington Post)
       
      1. You Are Bound by Nothing.
       
      Your future is limited only by your desire to succeed and work hard. Want to be a star athlete? Work your ass off. Want to join the military? Aim high. Want to be president? Go for it. Being gay in America no longer prevents you from doing anything you want to do. You just have to want it bad enough and work for it tirelessly. Don't be afraid of failure; it often teaches us far more than success ever could. Live authentically.
       
      2. Being Gay Is a Big Part of You, But It Isn't All of You.
       
      Yes, you're gloriously, fabulously gay! Your sexuality influences just about every aspect of your identity, but you are not a gay young man. You are a young man who is gay. You are not my gay son. You are my son who happens to be gay. If you get married, it won't be a gay marriage, just a marriage. Oh, and for the record, I want grandkids. Don't think being gay lets you off the hook on that one. It may define you, but it isn't the sole definition. One day I hope it will be as irrelevant as your eye color. In the meantime, know that while there may be those who give you grief because of it, far more will not give it a second thought.
       
      3. Know Your History.
       
      You are fortunate to live in a loving, accepting environment where the fact that you're gay is irrelevant at home and largely unremarkable at school. It hasn't always been this way, and it still isn't easy for everyone. There was a time not long ago when being openly gay was not just detrimental to success, it was potentially deadly. Countless numbers of men and women have fought for the relative safety and comfort you enjoy today. The modern gay rights movement, from Stonewall to Windsor, cost a lot of people real blood, sweat and tears, and it isn't over. For many people around the world, being gay is still a deadly proposition. You need to honor those who came before you by fighting for those who will come after you.
       
      4. HIV Is Still Deadly.
       
      HIV/AIDS may seem like some obscure bit of history that only older gay men have to deal with. It isn't. Young people account for nearly a quarter of all new HIV infections. Don't be complacent. Treatment has gotten much better, but people still die from AIDS. Don't think it can't happen to you; it can. Don't be afraid of sex, but know how to keep yourself safe and always assume anyone you're with could be carrying something. He may not even know it. You are responsible for keeping yourself healthy. Play safe and get tested regularly.
       
      5. Understand the Difference Between Lust, Love and Friendship.
       
      Men, by and large, will eagerly participate in sex. Know that just because a guy is willing to get naked with you, it doesn't mean he is interested in anything else. Frankly, it doesn't even mean he's gay. Also, don't assume a guy wants to get naked just because he's friendly. There will be men who think you're cool or funny or whatever, but it doesn't mean they want to get physical. They may just want to be your friend. Work to understand the difference. One day, you'll find someone who is all those things and he'll feel the same about you. Don't settle.
       
      6. I Love You.
       
      Last, and most importantly, I love you. My love for you is unquestionable, unconditional, and unending. Never forget that.
    • By scotty94
      Sam Smith is the most recent of celebrity who has come out as gay. I'm betting that by the end of 2015 at least four more celebrity will come out as being gay.
       
      I'm amazed that recent development and a better understanding of the LGBT community has caused an uproar and encouraged more famous face to internationally come out.
       
      I just hope that in the future more people will feel confident enough to come out, and be happy with themselves and there sexuality.
    • By Tiger
      Unfortunately, the woman from the A+ training place called this morning and said that we needed to reschedule. While I was a little disappointed, I know I will be able to go some time next week. In the mean time, I am going to focus as much as possible on writing. I have actually made some good progress already today. I hope to continue with that today, because I really want to wrap this one up so that everyone can see how it ends. Anyway, I just thought I would still update as promised even though there really is not much more that can be said about it yet.
    • By Tiger
      I'm not a firebug or anything, but yesterday I saw a house that was on fire. Apparently, it was set ablaze on purpose. The mayor of the town actually wanted the house to be gone. It was amazing. There's something about the power of fire that stirs the imagination for some reason. I could watch fires like that all the time, though it would never turn me on sexually or get to a point where I would become an arsonist. You could see the fire from anywhere in town, and I got several views of it from different angles. It was mesmerizing.
       
      Then, it was time to go home. I came home to an unpleasant surprise. The electricity was off. This was around 6:30 PM. I find this type of situation quite frustrating for some reason. It was hot. It had just rained, and the humidity was very high. My body was covered in sweat, but I tried to sleep anyway. I slept for a little over an hour. Soon after I woke up the electricity was back on, and I could finally sleep comfortably.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Our Privacy Policy can be found here. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..