I've been thinking a bit and I'm afraid I have to offer what I consider to be a small criticism (and a correction to my earlier post). I'm sure other readers will disagree with me.
The ending is not really a cliff-hanger. To me, a cliff-hanger is a build-up to a situation that is then left unresolved. In this case, all CJ has done is to effectively say 'wait, there's more!'
For a cliff-hanger, you could speculate on what is going to happen or wonder about different scenarios that would explain things. The ending he's done here, while mildly amusing because of the repetition of the phrase, gives absolutely no clues as to what is about to happen. It is just a statement that there is more bad news to come.
As such, I have to admit that I found it annoying. It doesn't do the job of building up tension (which is, I believe, one the purposes of using a cliff-hanger) but is simply a hook to request that the readers stay tuned for more -- something that only works for a serialised story. My personal view is if a writer does this too often, I get turned off. It makes me feel that the author things I'm an idiot and that I need this petty trick to keep reading. C James is NOT at that stage yet, but I'm hoping he doesn't do this too many more times, or too often, because it WILL turn me off the story and make me wait until the story is finished before I read the rest.
What do others think? Am I out on a limb by myself on this one? (It wouldn't be the first time )