Jump to content

Writing Tip: Oops, It's Wrong... Or Is It?


Cia has done it again and written what I think is a fantastic writing tip. Check it out and see if you agree...

Oops, it's wrong... or is it?

 


So many times I get confused by the complexities of English grammar, I'm sure many of you are the same. The rules are often contradictory, and the exceptions to exceptions are absolutely a quagmire of missteps and misspells waiting to trap you. I recently read an article that said to polish your writing skills, spend thirty minutes a month reviewing your grammar skills as well. After all, our stories are only as good as the way we present them. A great plot can only go so far. To help with that polish, here are a couple of the most common trip ups in word choices for you to review.

 

Its and It's.
Okay, so we're all taught that if Sally owns the red scarf, it is Sally's scarf. Notice the apostrophe s that indicates possession. That's the rule EXCEPT if the scarf belonged to an it. In that case it would be its scarf, no apostrophe. See, the only time it gets an apostrophe s is when you make it is into a conjunction or it's. An it doesn't get to show possession of anything with an apostrophe, poor thing!

 

Lay and Lie
This one is TRICKY! So, they are both verbs. BUT lay is an intransitive verb, it needs a subject and an object to work. I lay the food on the table. Past tense of lay is laid. I laid the food on the table for dinner. See, the food is the direct subject (who the action is happening to) and the object (where the verb is acting on) is the table. The verb, of course... is lay/laid.

 

Then you have lie. Lie is a verb that requires no object, because no one is doing anything to the subject, in this case. In the following example, no one is doing anything to the cat, but lie/lay tells you what the cat is doing, depending on your tense. The cats lie on the bed. In this case, the word lie is telling us what the cats are doing on the bed. Past tense would be, The cats lay on the bed. Since the action is being taken by the subject, not done to the subject, the verb is transitive and you use lie/lay.

 

Okay, how do you tell them apart? Usually if you read your sentence where 'I, he,she,it' is doing something to something else, you'd use the intransitive verb: lay/laid. If you read it aloud, you can also often tell if that is the verb form to use because the sentence is incomplete with an object: 'I lay the food' doesn't make much sense does it? I lay the food where?

 

Since and Because
I learned this rule because I made this mistake. The difference is that since speaks of a time frame and because is cause/effect. Look at my first sentence. I used because. If you say the sentence it wouldn't sound off to use either word, but because is appropriate as I'm telling you that making the mistake caused me to learn the rule. If I wanted to indicate a time frame about learning the rule, I would use since. I have not made this mistake since I learned this rule.

 

Who's and Whose
So who's is a contraction of who is. Whose is a word that shows possession. This one is simple to differentiate if you replace the word with who is. Who's going to ride in whose car? Try replace both of those with who is, you can clearly tell who is (who's) does not replace whose.

 

Nauseated and Nauseous
This is one I had no idea of until I read it! I'm sure I've broken this rule quite often, actually. The rule is that something can be nauseous, but if you feel sick you are nauseated. Huh . . . new things learned every day!

 

Now - do YOU have a writing tip that you think others could find useful? Let me know!

  • Like 4

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Former Member

Posted

I can recommend this website: http://www.englishpage.com

 

Also, what I see many people do wrong quite often is their/they're/there.

- Their shows possession (their house).

- They're is a contraction of they are.

- And there indicates a place (do you see that house over there?), and sometimes it's and adverb (There is something missing).

LJH

Posted

All right, I'll let you know.

 

All right

 

So many writers use the word alright. Much like they would use the words, already and altogether. But alright is wrong. The words should always be written out seperately. There are no such forms as all-right or allright. All right simply means that all is right. So, 'The scout's report was all right.' and "Is he all right?' and 'All right, you shall hear of this again." and 'Oh, I know this off pat, all right.'

 

Even if we are prepared to admit alright for some uses, for instance in 'That's quite all right.' and 'I'm quite all right.' We should spell it out. Alright will eventually establish itself in the long run, but it is hoped that it will be restricted to adverbial uses such as, The difficulty can be got over, alright. Even here, it is at present barely justifiable since the vocalic value of all is usually retained and no marked differentiation of meaning has yet taken place.

 

Taken from: Fowler's Modern English Usage.

Aeroplane

Posted

The cat toyed with his victim.

The cats toyed with their victim.

The cat's toy was his victim.

The cats' toy was his victim.

The cats' toy was their victim.

The cats toyed with their victim's mother.

The cats toyed with their victims' mother.

The cats' toy was their victims' mother. (haha)

 

 

The rules about plurality and apostrophes.

 

Single apostrophe then "s" if a single entity owns any number of objects.

Apostrophe after the pluralised word if a group of any size greater than 1 owns any number of objects.

The number of objects does not affect apostrophes, only the number of owners does (unless the object is also an owner).

 

No apostrophe if your sentence does not imply ownership of said toy/victim either by a group or a single entity.

 

You do not necessarily have to have an apostrophe before every s.

 

 

 

I'm sure most people have this one down, I just like cat sentences. (I hate grammar lessons because I'll invariably get something wrong) (The use of brackets is not a grammatical construct in this instance but a denotion of the tone and manner of my sentence).

 

Taken from my humours' imagination (because I have many humours all controlling my same imagination - HA).

  • Like 2
Zombie

Posted

Interesting. "Alright" is listed in my ancient Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary as "an unaccepted spelling of all right". That was in 1972, so this naughty contraction had clearly wormed its way into sufficiently common usage at least since the 1960s (hmm, Wiki style guide says no apostrophe here, but is that definitive?) and is still, apparently, in common usage more than 40 years later.

 

You're correct that "alright will eventually establish itself in the long run" because if enough people use it then it will become "correct". The fact is this is how English (syntax and words) has evolved to become what we know today. Purists and strict grammarians may resist change as an abomination, and many of us "fight" against "incorrect" usage, but change is a good thing. One of the reasons English has become so dominant is its (yay, no apostrophe!) uncontrolled ability to evolve new words, new constructions, and new usages. Change is the strength of the English language, keeping it fresh, vibrant and powerful. Contrast the pitiful attempts of the Académie Française to regulate and control the French language and consider the current status of French as a World language.

 

All right, personally I don't necessarily agree with many of these changes but, to use the Vogons' favourite phrase, I am afraid "resistance is useless" :)

Jammi

Posted

Speaking of transitive verbs, set and sit is another that trips people up. Set is transitive it describes an action being done to an object. ie; I set the plant on the table. If "on the table" was omitted from the sentence, it becomes unclear.

 

On the other hand Sit is intransitive. It describes an action undertaken by the subject of the sentence. I"to sit" does not express the kind of action that can be DONE TO anything. ie; Max sits there ever day. He sat there yesterday, and will be sitting there tomorrow.

 

I try to remember by thinking, you set objects down, and people and animals sit

 

reference Get It Write: http://www.getitwriteonline.com/archive/060602SitSet.htm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...