So im bored and want the smart people here to work thier little brains....or maybe....actually i just want them to work, hehe. So anyways i will be making two hypothetical (hope thats how you spell it) in this post.
Okay on with the first one: In the immortal words of my HS Chemistry teacher, In this Universe there is a finite source/amount of energy. Hence forth the same energy that existed before exists now and we are made out of it. In my belief i trust the laws that energy or matter can not be created or destroyed, only "converted" into on form into another (Big No No saying we can create or destroy). I also believe in the future we will be able to convert matter into energy or energy into matter more efficiantly (again i think i spelled that wrong) but as of right now our understanding of the basics is too limited.
So off to the second one, which is more of a question to out resident physicists (coughSNOWYcough) or maybe James will answer, but who knows.....Anyways, what im having issues is with some movies showing the destruction of a planet. Most movies just show a planet being blown into rubble and such. But after watching some "educational" shows (Yes i actually watch those because sometimes there is nothing good on the telly). So my belief is that when a planet is being "blown up" (using that term lightly), it would ecentually (hope thats a word) super heat the crust back into a molten slag (eventually pressure would build up) and then an explosion will hence result, some debri will be thrown out to space and some will stay around the old planetary field area. The core of the planet would then be smaller thats it predessecor, which then would start to pull back (i would say gravitational and electromagnetic force) in the derbri field around it to create a new world (albeit smaller than the previous on)....
Ahem, Snowy you have the right to spank me if i got stuff wrong ......(oh dont go all too scientific, hehe)
So yeah....
*Looks around nervously before stepping down the podium*
Jules