Jump to content

Book Review: The AIDS Pandemic by James Chin


Drew Payne

404 views

There have been many different theories about the spread of AIDS, some of them bizarre, but here James Chin returns to a very old one; AIDS is not a threat to the heterosexual population. Chin is an epidemiologist and bases all his arguments on a narrow reading of the HIV/AIDS statistics. He seems to want to turn back the clock to when we talked only of “risk groups”.  There are no political, cultural, social or psychological elements in Chin’s arguments, which leaves this book very one-sided.

Between 1987 and 1992 Chin worked for the World Health Organisation (WHO) on HIV/AIDS surveillance until he abruptly resigned over what appears to have been a personality clash. This book seems to be an attempt at settling his old scores with WHO. Throughout it there is a relentless attack on WHO’s HIV/AIDS programs, the main argument being that WHO is wrong in saying that AIDS will affect the general population because, Chin claims, they have overestimated the figures.

This book is written in the first person; while appropriate for a biography it does not enhance an academic work. It only shows the one-sided nature of Chin’s arguments and highlights the lack of depth to them. There is little analysing here, only Chin’s singular views.

This book does show the dangers of using only one discipline to tackle a complex problem and the narrow findings this can give. All this book offers the reader is number crunching and the rehashing of a very old argument, HIV/AIDS prevention needs to be far more than just that.

 

(This review was originally written as a commission by the Nursing Standard magazine)

 

Find it on Amazon here

 

 

The AIDS Pandemic.jpg

Edited by Drew Payne
Doctor Who Redacted

  • Like 1

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

On 8/21/2022 at 12:43 AM, chris191070 said:

Awesome article. We've come along way since this article was written.

Thank you. This was the first negative review I submitted and I really worried that it was negative, but God the book was bad. They liked the review because I reasoned out my argument.

We have come a long way since this book was published and in some ways we haven't moved at all. Look at all the homophobia and bigotry around Monkey Pox.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Our Privacy Policy can be found here: Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..