shadowgod

look its two wild and crazy guys... another petty annoyance... people who edit their blog responses. And honestly it doesnt come from the crush thread. It came from another series of posts, and other things.

I agree, Sorry Im not going to stand and watch as a girl gets beaten. So what if they fire me. What the hell has happened to common decency? and why on gods name would anyone stand up for some idiot standing around with his thumb up his ass?

as long as no one is flashing booty or other ... parts You look at pictures at your own risk.

*drools after (insert person)* and "Hey (insert person) you are very handsome" or some other discombobulation are perfectly fine. It's the posts that drag that statement out into two or three sentences that read as if the two people were in front of one another, One of them would lack all social tact and restraint. Its a message board people, just because the thinning veil of anonymity separates us does not mean it okay to violate another persons boundaries in a series of posts. Like a way a person looks go ahead and playfully insert drool that isn't the issue; the issue is: typing out what you would like to do to a person given a weekend, and the opportunity. Decorum is attractive. It is what separates us from animals. Then again I guess some people like animals.

Meat markets. Sorry its not what I come here for, sure telling another person they are good looking is cool. But having to read about a person slobber all over themselves is just... not cool. If you want to slobber over yourself take it to a pm. That's what they are for. This place has gotten more and more like a strip bar and its kind of off putting.

Sadly you are misguided Mark American Greeting Co. was founded in 1906 Hallmark was founded in 1910 Valentines Day was christened by Pope Gelasius in 495. Also there are valentines cards around from the 1850's But I will agree its just a grossly commercial way to remind people that the are in fact single. so thanks for the thread Tim

Then make chat peaceful and fun through your actions. Not through some arbitrary set of guidelines that create two separate classes of chat participants. Like I said I don't find fault with your want to create guidelines. I find fault with the "Newbies" vs "Regulars" approach. If you can come up with a set of guidelines that can unilaterally cover all members I am all for it. However, I do believe we have a set of those already. But maybe we need to find a way to make them more clearly visible to people entering chat.

Explain to me how, if the community rules and standards are being ignored, A specific set of chat guidelines are going to solve the problem? You are indeed right however, members could not follow the site rules. One of the prescribed consequences for not doing so is the removal of privileges. Maybe now that we are aware that a service can, and will, be removed if it is causing a disruption; we will be more observant of what is and is not appropriate. also to clearly spell out what that is: Disruptive activity includes, but is not limited to: (1) posts that disrupt the topic of conversation or steer the discussion away from the focus of the topic, (2) multiple posting of the same post, (3) posting completely off topic messages, (4) messages constantly posted in the wrong forum, (5) messages posted in all-caps, (6) harassment of any member, (7) deliberate misrepresentation of another person's position, (8) compromising the privacy of any member, (9) inappropriate behavior towards any minor, and (10) any other behavior that in the view of GA management is disruptive of the site or poses a danger to any member or author. Pretty simple, and they can be applied equally to everyone, without the added headache of who is a chat "regular" and who is not.

why not just say "Come, chat & maybe we will like you"? I understand what you are trying to do, unfortunately it isn't very welcoming. Not only is it not welcoming to new members, it is not welcoming to existing members who do not use chat regularly. These rules can not be instituted uniformly, anyone enforcing them would have to deliniate who is a "regular" and who is not. Then at what point does a member become a regular? Is it when all regulars like them, or just a select group? If so, who decides that group? Community rules and standards are already in place. Simply put, just treat everyone with respect. No sniping or back biting is wanted nor needed.

Nope, you could upload in the Gallery and not effect the global quota (that is for forum posts only the gallery is a separate add on) You could upload images in the gallery and then use the image embed to post a photo and it will post as Patrick Star's and the majority of other personal photo's in this thread. Also, If you guys do not have anything nice to say, do not say anything at all. Pretty Simple.

the lady that owns the rights is a Mormon, I highly doubt she would sign off on a sex toy. And also Cap'n people will pitch what ever they think will make a dime, that's the way the world works.

Hello! Welcome To GA, What about posting for every chapter don't you understand? If you have any questions just shout any of us with these green tags we'll do our best to help you out.

registered... Geography Lab and World religions.... time to go back to bed.

I've been trying to register for my spring semester for the last 2 hours. The website has been down... this all just figures.

We have an odd relationship you and I. It was fun in the beginning, flirtatious and ever so drawn-out. Remember the hours I spent exploring you? I do. I thirsted for whatever you were willing to offer up. You offered up a lot, in the beginning. These last several months

Yes Linxe, Tim is obviously trying to spur discussion. Leave the cranky to me it looks bad on you. One thing I love about the Mac Book Pro is the multi-touch track pad. There is no fiddling with the scroll bar to the left of the screen or a special area on the track pad for vertical scrolling. Simple just drag two fingers up or down and viola you get to scroll, pretty effortless. Now we will see if the bootcamp update fixes my issues with this locking up whenever I have too many tabs open.

closettales.net was its home at one time... but as far as I know that has gone under. I heard it was at another site as well, but I can't recall the name currently

So, with an extreme lack of anything to do lately and owing to the fact it was completed, I have been rereading Dom's In the Fish Bowl.. Saw an ad that I found particularly amusing, mostly because it is so off target its too funny. cougarlife.com I shouldn't be surprised about this, nevertheless too funny.

Hrmm... I'm sorry the quirks of biology offend you (Its a fact: two squiggly tailed swimmers do not a baby make) I'm sorry sir, I did not make these rules, I am just forced to abide by them. Dont think me so naive that I do not realize that there are a multitude of ways that a gay couple could have children. However, I present that the child, at most, would only be representative of 50% of said couples DNA. So very clearly, as noted in my post, not the same thing. This doesn't mean the children are less, that is you inserting your assumptions into my opinion. Adopted, surrogate, ... whatever. They are not less, just not the same, and they never could be. Also, you should really not let a, for all intents and purposes, perfect stangers opinions offend you. By all means disagree, but to be offended? Come on.

Wow look at the enchidna use the goats tactics against him. They learn so fast....

It

its been awhile I guess

one word Art

the goat will deny. deny. deny. that is a Mountain goat, and he... {sarcasm} surely would not go around anything that has "heights"{/sarcasm}