Perhaps Scalia is a good scholar of the Constitution, but he still has not convinced me. He appears to begin with an agenda, and looks for backup.

I think his fiery rhetoric often serves to disguise the weakness of his arguments.

"Applesauce!"

(lol - that must be old-man speak for something, but who knows what...perhaps it's a fit word for his 'legacy' as a 'justice')

I know I'm biased, but I don't think his dissent was particularly convincing.

Nobody with half a brain was persuaded by his bullshit.