is nonsense. If I buy something online from Barnes and Noble or Target or Macy's or Gap they bill and I pay my state and local sales tax. If these retailers can calculate sales taxes for every state where they do business, so can Amazon.com. For small internet retailers here's an opportunity for someone to provide a service so each retailer won't have to maintain all of the the state and local sales tax rates and do the calculations themselves. (Any budding entrepreneurs out there?)
I'm willing to pay sales taxes on what I buy over the internet. It would simplify my life because I would no longer have to accumulate my online purchases and calculate the use tax for my California state income tax return each year. Yes, I pay the use tax. It's the law and I'm a law-abiding citizen. And I really don't want to be penalized by the Franchise Tax Board for not paying the use tax.
Colin
You miss the point that Macy's, Barnes & Noble, Target and Gap all have a presence in CA and that is the crucial distinction. The biggest argument from the online retailers isn't that it is too hard to maintain that database, that is a secondary concern. The main argument is that only Congress can regulate interstate commerce. If you go to Reno for the weekend and buy a book at Barnes & Noble in Reno, should California be able to collect sales tax for that? No, you didn't make the purchase in CA, you made it in NV. Congress, despite their money hungry ways, have several times specifically decided not to tax Internet purchases. It doesn't give Amazon an advantage over local retailers since they have to charge shipping and handling and that is usually the same or more than taxes.