Lugh

YAY INDEPENDENCE! it's good in all shapes and sizes!

HAPPY B-DAY!!!! and many more!

LOL that's almost as good as the moth in the ear!

LOL good job pietro!!! get to writing Dio... prove the man wrong!!

YAY!!! me next! me next! me next! SPIFFY page C J! Happy Writing!

Ok, Everyone has been to the ER for a rather silly or embarassing reason... Like when I was packing for a week long camping trip I had a moth fly in my ear.. I had to go to the ER to have it removed. The nurse freaked out, but we managed to flush it out with no damage to my ear except that the canal and drum were hyper sensitive for about two weeks. So, what is your "most embarassing" ER moment?

HOPPY HOPPY DIRTBAY TWO EWE!!!! and many more....

heh.. Reading... who has time for reading when you guys keep telling me to WRITE! but yes I do read... currently I'm reading some romance novels (the straight kind) because I don't like to read gay fiction when i"m actively writing gay fiction... go figure. on the other hand there are some stories I'm following: The Prince The Pastel Cowboy Heart of the Tree just about anything by Virtual Insanity Identity Another kind of fear Home to Jude Reservations Three Roads Joel Waco-Lummox um.. um... oh I know there's more!

pouts I'm not on your list!

take everything I'm about to say in the light that it is coming from the guy who did a bit more than just date his nephew in college... when dealing with half-siblings (which is essentially what the children of clones are no matter if they occur naturally (via twinning) or unnaturally (in a futuristic laboratory)) knowledge is the key. If they are unaware they are related then they are innocent of any taboo/law breaking. If they are aware, well taboo breaking is not a bad thing really... I feel the same goes for any family member where one member of the family is raised seperately from the rest (such was my case). Unknowing, consentual Iincest between the offspring of a clone and the offspring of the original, to me, is not icky. If they are both males, or both females, it is still not icky if they do become aware. However it is when the mixed-gender relationship comes into effect that it becomes a legal issue.

Hey! Happy B-day dude! Lugh

oddly I don't find myself in any of those catagories either... where did this come from? I'd hate to say that it's not accurate at all. Maybe a better listing would be: 1. Rude! : No matter what their orientation/gender these people are just jerks. 2. Samplers: They like to try a little of everything -- orientation/gender notwithstanding -- not interested in a committed relationship. 3. Married: Whether it's a committed relationship or actual vows... these people have committed to another person and are not looking for sex outside of that relationship. They are, however, looking for friends. 4. Cheaters: They are in a committed relationship but they tend to stray from time to time. 5. Emotional Lovers: They are able to love many different people (orientation/gender notwithstanding) without it becoming sexual. 6. Single and Looking: They are on the look out for that perfect person in their lives.

crooning... Bo-orn to be bi-iiii! lemme see I'm ambidexterious, and I got two swirls, one clockwise and one counterclockwise.... and um... um.. i"m the 5th boy out of seven pregnancies and I was born the lastest... oh wait that would make me queer....

okies... first of all, welcome. second off.. unless the rules have changed drastically you do not need to have any status to post things in e-fiction, you just can not post on the announcement boards with out 'author' status. So feel free to post your story, then contact the admins to let them know you have. thirdly, you need to have at least five posts to get out of "n00bie" status and activate some of the more interesting things on the boards (like PMs and Blogs) looking forward to working with you, Lugh

ok... if this law is going to outlaw the showing of one's underwear does it include women's upper foundational support? Granted I understand that it is aimed at male's drawers, but depending on how it is worded then any undergarment can become suspect. Hell go with out the underpants and just show your upper cheeks and a bit of pubic hair... or would that be considered indecent too? damn there goes clubbing. Lugh

thank you Sharon... the links were helpful!

Research for a story. Lugh

and this has what to do with the question at hand? sighs I really need help.

Come on guys.. anyone who has done this at this point is an expert as far as I'm concerned.

happy b-day Vikki!!! yay for you! hugs, Lugh

ok I need some research info... what happens when a person is sky diving... yanno the steps from in the plane to on the ground. please? thank you! Lugh

confidence enables a person to accomplish things. ego causes them to brag about those accomplishments. the confidence does not end where the ego begins, however other people may not see it that way.

sorry but I have to laugh at this... DC went through a period of about a year where, I swear, he got daily spankings. But it was not the first option, nor the second. I just have an extreamly hard headed son. We had a chart. We made the chart together under the guidance of the therapist. DC picked most of the punishments 'so they would be relavent to him and so that he would not feel *I* was punishing him but that 'he was earning consequences for actions he preformed'. Granted at the top of the list was time out, sent to room, no telle, no bike, things of that nature. In the middle there were more severe punishments. But at the bottom was this line: "These are things my father will not tolerate: lying, stealing, and leaving without permission. If I do these things I will earn a spanking of not less than five spanks with the belt on my bottom." He knew it was there. He helped to put it there. He broke that one rule more often than any of the others. He would take his spanking and do it again the next day. I was frustrated. I told the therapist. The therapist talked to him. You know what he said? "Those things I know makes my dad mad, but I can't help it sometimes. So I put the one thing there that he could just 'get out of the way quickly' so that the punishment would be over and I could go out the next day." After that conversation that bottom rule changed. He would get 7 SUNNY days of house restriction for the first infraction and begin loosing other things with each consecutive infraction. In less than a week he was on a month's restriction and had lost everything in his room... did I mention the boy is hard-headed? Needless to say his behavior has now changed. I don't know what changed it. It surely wasn't my punishing him. Maybe part of it was maturity. A lesson learned. now on to the original topic: censorship I do not believe in censorship on any level. I do believe it is the parent's responsibilty to govern what their children watch, read, do on the internet. HOWEVER, I can understand why some people believe in censorship.. it's because parents are not doing their job. However some of it is rediculous. For example, we went to a public showing of "Grease"... yes the one with Sandra Dee and John Travolta. The guys showing the film stated that they had 'skipped one scene due to parental objection'. I was trying to figure out which scene had gotten skipped... I mean there was the coach's speech with 5 or 6 4 letter words, and the word "pussy wagon" in the song Grease Lightning... and then there was the word "virgin" in the Sandra Dee song... guess which one they clipped? heh... the Sandra Dee song... amazing that. Lugh

hum... is the visitation court ordered as in: he gets the child from 6 -8 on wednesday and every other saturday (kinda hard to do in jail) or is it that the custodial parent must bring the infant to the jail to see the non-custodial parent? could it be argued that jail is not a 'healthy environment' for a child? could the visitations (if enforced) be handled by a third party? could she get some sort of court order to keep him away from her thus making it so that she (and the baby) have no contact with the criminal? I'm not so sure I understand this plea thing... this was rape and other things I would think... bad things. Eight years is not long enough, not for the rape of a child. Hopefully he will not survive his prison term, then the problem will be solved. Hugs and prayers for your um.. client. Lugh

hahahaha yer old now too!!! happy b-day twin mine!