Jump to content

Featured Story: Desert Dropping


Ha! Time to rile up all the lazy Domaholics on the site. This week's featured story is by their missing favorite author Dom Luka, which of course everyone wants out of hiding... well everyone that is except maybe our reviewer....


by DomLuka


published on GA December 27th, 2010.


36 chapters, 389,678 words.

 

It was a tried and true—if overused—premise. The protagonist, a typical closeted teenager named Rory, is thrust into a new environment and family in Arizona, where he finds himself and reconciles with the event to propelled him there (the death of his mother). DomLuka’s well-deserved reputation renders an assessment of the mechanics of the story largely unnecessary. Scene descriptions are written with clear experience, interspersed with the thoughts of the protagonist, and the reader is immediately immersed in Rory’s world.

 

“Desert Dropping” takes place over the course of one summer. While this is an appropriate time frame, it nevertheless falls victim somewhat to monotonous repetition. For instance, there were many, many scenes of swimming and eating that had little to do with the overall plot of the story. The story would have benefitted from research—perhaps into more unique aspects of Arizona—to facilitate further immersion and more excitement. As it stands, all we know about Arizona was that it’s a hot place. Boys seem to prance around shirtless all the time. But the story could have taken place anywhere in the summer.

 

The mechanics of characterization was perhaps the strongest aspect to the story. Unlike many other stories, in which characters come from all-American cookie-cutter molds, characters in Desert Dropping are anything but perfect. Each of the main characters—Rory, Luke, Aaron, Seth, Eddie, Jace—are deeply flawed. These flaws, as well as the characters’ changes in their relationships to each other, make for a nuanced story that continues to keep the reader’s interest. They also facilitate strong emotional reactions throughout the reading. For instance, I at first cringed whenever Aaron or Seth was mentioned, but towards the end, I felt differently as the characters themselves changed. To be able to bait and toy with the emotions of the reader, especially at this level, takes prodigious skill indeed.

 

Yet at the same time, these flaws can be too extreme, and immersion in the life of the very flawed protagonist can backfire. Rory’s annoying childishness and bizarre tantrums, for instance, made me want to physically reach into the pages of the story and strangle him. Worse, the weak and womanish enabling of this behavior by Rory’s father was even more frustrating. Although these molasses-paced exchanges work to nudge the story forward, the lack of plot-driving action means that the story often finds itself mired in gay-angst for hundreds of pages at a time. This is perhaps the most cliché sort of writing and something writers should always try to avoid.

 

Because the plot meanders so much—think of how many times someone says, “we need to talk” or some variation thereof—actual plot devices have diminished effect. Indeed, when Rory’s grandmother (perhaps the only character with any measure of testicular fortitude) shows up at the door, I found myself thinking, “Finally, something is happening…” instead of the more desirable and interesting, “oh look, an unexpected plot twist! I’m so excited to see what will happen!” The final, tortured decision by Rory to stay with his new family after weeks of unbelievable stubbornness also did not win him as many points as it should have with me.

 

Other characters were far more likeable. Luke, for instance, acted as a fine anchor of sanity and maturity in the story when everyone else was frozen in angst. While I was disappointed that he and Rory never developed even an experimentally romantic relationship, I found that this contributed to the mystery of his character. Seth, too, was a consistent sweetheart, and the contrast between him and Aaron, especially in how he displays affection for Rory, was well made.

 

This exposes perhaps the central problem in the story. Why do the perfectly attractive and mature Luke and Seth want anything to do with a whiny and incorrigible child like Rory, who consistently refuses to listen to good advice, and who, at various points in the story treated both of them vindictively? Rory is never “redeemed” the way Aaron was, even though the tragedy at the end was arguably his fault. (OK, maybe this is unfair, but if I were in his position, the thought would at least cross my mind that my refusal to stay was what made Eddie distraught and vulnerable to accident). Instead, everyone, worst of all his father, treats him like a golden child no matter how he acts, and his unpunished bad behavior throughout means I was almost frustrated to see him end up happy.

 

But in the end, good writing can overcome much. Taken as whole, the saga was satisfying and at moments incredibly sweet. The (sadly infrequent) sex scenes are expertly written, and most loose ends are tied, leaving the reader few questions. I would have liked to find out more about Luke’s past, and seen Rory “redeemed”—perhaps by calling Eddie “dad” for the first time. But overall, this story is well worth your time, and well deserving of its status in the GA archives.

 

3.5 (Out of 5)

 

 

 


Heh.. I'm so not releasing the name of the reviewer. If they want to come out of the closet, that is up to them. Needless to say, go read it for yourself to see if you agree, disagree, or want to just plain strangle the reviewer. In the meantime... read, review, review review... and don't forget those like buttons.

  • Like 4

40 Comments


Recommended Comments



  • Site Administrator
Cia

Posted

*As a side note to management: I disliked the way this review was presented. Lugh knew exactly what he was doing by withholding the reviewer’s identity and, with his opening gambit, intentionally baiting a portion of this site’s membership while Cia stood by with her ruler smacking anyone’s knuckles that responded just the way Lugh wanted. It’s like some twisted version of good cop, bad cop. Other author reviews have been handled in a straightforward manner. This one wasn’t just to make a point. I have never understood that fine line of utter contempt this site shows toward one of its best and most popular authors.

 

Woah. Really? You think we're collaborating to steer the blog in such a way to deliberately insult Dom and/or belittle members? I talked to Lugh in chat yesterday and that's about it. Every response I made about my opinions as to the story and the way members react is consistent with the way I respond ALL THE TIME. I don't believe in sugarcoating things. If I feel something about a story I've read, I comment on it. If I think members are trashing a person or a story unfairly, I say so. I don't recall smacking any knuckles, simply asking people to respond to the story and discuss the points the review highlighted or that they liked/disliked about the story rather than simply nitpick the review or blast the person for daring to dislike PARTS of Dom's story. How in the hell is that a bad thing?

 

I'd also like to know how 'the site' is expressing a fine line of utter contempt toward one of its "best and most popular author". By allowing someone to post a blog review stating that they thought parts of the story were lacking or overdone? By me agreeing with them as a reader? By Lugh withholding the name of the review author because of reactions from fans, which we all know can be pretty vehement in their responses? After all, look at the comment I quoted from yours.

  • Site Administrator
Myr

Posted

*As a side note to management: I disliked the way this review was presented. Lugh knew exactly what he was doing by withholding the reviewer’s identity and, with his opening gambit, intentionally baiting a portion of this site’s membership while Cia stood by with her ruler smacking anyone’s knuckles that responded just the way Lugh wanted. It’s like some twisted version of good cop, bad cop. Other author reviews have been handled in a straightforward manner. This one wasn’t just to make a point. I have never understood that fine line of utter contempt this site shows toward one of its best and most popular authors.

I am not really sure why the groupthink/mob mentality exsits that everyone has to agree on everything. Opinions (and reviews) are like assholes. We all have one. And they all stink. Lugh posted this review in the way he did to elicit response. And as he said earlier, it has had quite the response.

 

As for 'management' having 'utter contempt' towards an author... that is complete and utter bullshit of the highest order.

Dom was one of the first authors on this site and I picked him because he is a phenomial writer. Even if Desert Dropping isn't my favorite story, I do like it. I do not agree with the reviewer, but that is one person's opinion.

 

And if we blocked that opinion from being expressed, we'd get whining about censorship in the other direction. Damned if we do, damned if we don't.

  • Like 3
Red_A

Posted

WOW, what a Reaction!

 

First I do not agree with the reviewer. As a teenager, I experienced, second hand, the torment of a mixed up kid removed from his home environment. Yes he was a whining, unlikable character, yes he tried to keep to the monotonous mundane lifestyle. Yes, people took advantage of him. I can see it mirrorred all too clearly in Desert Dropping. I think it is tribute to Dom that the tale is so entralling, despite its not very nice topic.

But that is my opinon, my life influences my opinon, I can see how somebody from a different background would see differently. Whoever it is,john doe, tom cobley, or Dom! Has a right to his opinon.

If I was Lugh I would have insisted that the reviewer was unnamed. Dom deserved following, would be too much. And I would jump at the oppertunity to publish the review. Lugh has always tried to get people to think , and get involved. I think Dom is an excellant writer, I think another author is rotten. Others may not agree with me. Is it not time with look at other author's stories that may be we do not like again at look at them in a different light.

The reaction to the review shows that people think DOM is an excellant author. It has gathered interest in the Blog, and like Myr says which ever way you go you are dammed. An interesting topic or a dead blog!

Mark Arbour

Posted

I didn't hear any talk of censorship here. The issue is not whether a review should or shouldn't be published, the issue is whether it should be done anonymously. There's no gray area here. The answer is no. The reviewer should be willing and able to stand up for what he/she wrote. If you can't do that, you shouldn't write it. That's not censorship, that's conviction in what you believe, in what you think. This isn't about a popularity contest, it's about some level of literary integrity. When a review like this comes out anonymously and bashes, as Sharon said, "one of GA's best and most popular authors", it makes the whole motivation suspect. Is it just latent jealousy by some at Dom's continuing popularity despite his absence? Is there some other reason? Because we don't know who wrote it, it can't be put into context. It makes the entire community look bad.

 

Look at how much better Cia's review was. She made her points, but did it in a respectful way. She recognized both the audience for the story and for the review. How much hate mail did you get over that one, Cia? What if she'd slammed the story? She'd have had to back it up. What's so bad about that?

 

But it's done. It's over. It got attention, and got people looking at Dom's work. I'm just asking that we not do this again. Let's keep the process transparent. It's better for everyone that way.

JOeKEool

Posted

As someone else said,Dessert Dropping is what brought me to GA. I read the whole thing after it's completion. I agree, waiting for a new chapter each time would have added to the overall drama.

The reviewer did state "good writing can overcome much"..."was satisfying"..."incredibly sweet".

There were many,many other positive elements in the review. We have to let people say what they feel and we can agree or not. Please don't bash the reviewer or those that comment.

 

EDIT: I agree. Anonymity is what is at fault here. Not the review.

 

I think this is just BAIT to get Dom to respond and I hope it works!!!Dom, you have the floor.

Lugh

Posted

Interesting that you all picked this one to gripe about an anonymous review when it's not the first one I've posted...

 

just a side note.

  • Like 1
Marzipan

Posted

Hello all, I'm a Domaholic.

 

DD was the first story I read from Dom. This review does not change how I feel about it. I loved Rory, what are you all bitching about him :P

 

I liked this post, it created discussion, it made people participate. I shouldn't even have to say I don't agree with the review, even if I enjoyed some other works by Dom even more. I have no problems of letting Dom or other authors know how I feel about their stories either. Reviews are blessings, I wouldn't mind receiving anonymous ones either. One needs to be able to filter them, read them for what they are - one person's highly personal opinnion. I think even Dom can do that and I bet he knows the amount of love we have for his stories.

  • Like 1
TrevorTime

Posted

"Personally, I think of Desert Dropping is in the top 10% of stories on GA."

 

Oh, I totally agree. In fact, it was my all time favorite story here until some little Soccer Boy story came around.

 

"Rory has to be the whineiest little shit ever created. But to be able to create a character that causes your readers to want to reach through their computer screen and strangle is a magical skill."

 

Oh yeah. Time and time again, I wanted to reach though my screen and smack the angst right out of Rory's whiny body. I thought I was bad when I was 15, but Rory takes it to a whole new level.

 

As to the original reviewer, well, he or she obviously sparked a reaction. Yes, we Domaholics can be a vocal bunch!

Gandalf

Posted

If I remember correctly DD was either my first adventure here or one of them. I was hooked. I hung around read more of Dom and found early Lugh(one of my all time favorite writers.. so write more please} and many others.

 

I was pleased to see DD featured. I just reread Behind those Eyes and really enjoyed it. I have reread DD since the first time. Or at least started it. I think I found some of the issues mentioned in the review got in the way.

 

Sat8997makes an important and interesting point regarding publishing books serially. I wonder how much Dickens or Twain had their stories edited between serialization and book form? As a gay man and a transoceanic sailor I have followed and enjoyed Circumnavigation and will miss its weekly(or nearly so installments} but would suspect that it like many of the great stories both here and on the web in general make great serials thanks to the cliffhangers eh.. but could probably improve with some editing. Not sure that is really likely to happen or that it matters. What to me is so important is that today on the internet all the things that I thought made me feel differnt growing up are addressed. I find that I am not alone in being gay, entranced by men's haircuts, bondage, or even(this is for you Riley Jerico} being nearly the only guy I knew with a foreskin.

 

I like many miss Dom's additions and hope firstly that he is ok and secondly that he will someday return. One of the tragedies of the internet is that so often stories stop in mid stream either because the writer has painted themselfves in a corner or lost interest or totally found another life.

 

Sooo I am going to give DD another read or try at least. But I am sure that I will remember what a great adventure it was to read it the first time. Pax

Billy Martin

Posted

I didn't think Rory was a bad character. I was lucky in that I got to read the story straight through without having to wait on a chapter a week or whatever the time frame used. We all react differently to major events in our lifes and what Rory went through would caused many adults to react much more poorly.

 

I had no problems with the review. After all, it's just one person's opionion. I'm sure there are other stories that the reviewer and I would disagree on. As it has been said, the point of the feature and review was to remind people of Dom's awesome stories and to offer a chance for dialog concerning Dom's work.

 

I hope one day my work will inspire a discussion like this. Then I will know I have reached a level where my work actually have possibilities. Until then, I will be happy to read stories that make me think and feel like this story has.

Merlin

Posted

I was the author of this review.

 

I apologize in advance for the controversy I seem to have caused. I did not ask for, nor was I told that my name would be withheld. Lugh only told me tonight that he posted the review anonymously.

 

To clear up some of the confusion and conspiracy theories. I had already been halfway through reading this story when Lugh suggested that I review something (anything) for the newsblog. Since I was already reading the story, I volunteered to review Desert Dropping. Because of the timing of the situation, it was not possible for me to have been influenced or coerced into writing negatively about any certain author because management wanted him slandered.

 

About the review itself. The opinions, of course, are my own. I agree with many of the comments (and indicated in my review) that the fact that you cared so much about the characters as to want to hurt them through the screen was a sign of strength and maturity in a writer. However, my other thoughts on the story stand, and certainly you are entitled to disagree.

 

I apologize if the writing seemed harsh or criticisms undeserved, as this was never my intention. I wrote in the style of a critic, and surely an author as great as DomLuka could withstand being read with a critical eye. No one, least of all me, wishes to challenge this writer's status and place in this community. I never said, not did I mean to imply that I could have written the story better. I wished only to present my own view on the story, as was requested of me by the newsblog team.

  • Like 1
JOeKEool

Posted

Merlin. Hi. I don't fault you at all. You gave an honest review with your honest opinions.

In a previous post,I referred to several positive remarks you made. Neither you nor Admin in any way are bashing Dom or his abilities.I can see ,and agreed that the long drawn out drama was there. You have every right to state your opinion.

Most of the controversy ,IMHO stems from the anonymity of the post. The members here should be expected to respect all opinion. That is why I find it so welcoming here.

Granted,WE Domaholics are fiercely loyal. But I hope we have respect for a differing view.

Gandalf

Posted

Hey maybe this review will stir the missing Man back to write some more. Adulation clearly hasn't worked eh. I must say that I am still slogging on thru DD but may need to go, like Dom, on hiatus.

Endymion1978

Posted

I’m not a writer and English is not my mother tongue so please bear with me ;-). After reading the review and most of the comments here, I have a few comments; I love Dom, I think he’s a great author and I’m one of those constantly checking to see if he has resurfaced, but I digress. If you’ve read all of Dom’s stories posted here, you have to realize the common subject is teenage angst therefore you can’t complain about the plot having too much of it; remember your teenage years people, where a minuscule pimple was the end of the world or when that guy (or girl) you had a crush on and suddenly you were walking on cloud 9!

 

It’s a stressful period and I think Dom makes a superb job at describing it. On the other hand, as someone mentioned, the things happening in Rory’s life were very serious, more so for a teenager, so please give him some leniency.

 

Now don’t mistake me, I also wanted to strangle him at times but, as someone else pointed out, the fact that you become so enraptured in the plot that you actually got to feel something while reading is testament of Dom’s talent.

 

Someone mentioned there were few sex scenes; I personally prefer few sex scenes and a really good plot.

 

This is not my favorite story, I’ve read The Ordinary Us several times but, if the reviewer thinks Rory’s angst was too much then, he/she will hate Quinn from the start!

 

Now on that line, can someone tell Dom that we his legions of readers are waiting for him? Three of my favorite authors (besides you guys & girls of course), are MIA! L

Endymion1978

Posted

Hey maybe this review will stir the missing Man back to write some more. Adulation clearly hasn't worked eh. I must say that I am still slogging on thru DD but may need to go, like Dom, on hiatus.

 

If this actually work, can we get the same reviewer for Duncan Ryder and CP Lydon please!


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...