Uncut Men: Where in the USA are they?

[Mark Arbour]

Where the Uncut Men of America are.

[thatboyChase]

oh mark, you and your uncut man hunting.

 

I remember I hooked up with a guy with an uncut dick. It was such a weird experience for me, at least using it sexually. Looking at an uncut penis, whatever, most european porn stars have that stuff, not to mention the countries below the prime meridian. Anyways, I'm jealous in regards to sensation as I guess studies show uncut penile devices receive more pleasure than cut. This was concluded when I was giving head to uncut penis guy aforementioned, I guess the nerve endings there are intense. Somebody with an uncut penis should comment, please.

 

I also read an article a while ago, I THINK in the Times, about people undergoing surgery to put the skin back? I might be completely misguided or wrong, however, interesting. I'll stop talking now.

[Caedus]

oh mark, you and your uncut man hunting.

 

I remember I hooked up with a guy with an uncut dick. It was such a weird experience for me, at least using it sexually. Looking at an uncut penis, whatever, most european porn stars have that stuff, not to mention the countries below the prime meridian. Anyways, I'm jealous in regards to sensation as I guess studies show uncut penile devices receive more pleasure than cut. This was concluded when I was giving head to uncut penis guy aforementioned, I guess the nerve endings there are intense. Somebody with an uncut penis should comment, please.

 

I also read an article a while ago, I THINK in the Times, about people undergoing surgery to put the skin back? I might be completely misguided or wrong, however, interesting. I'll stop talking now.

Your sample was too small. That's a common hypothesis, one that this 2007 research article refutes. The researchers used 40 men (split equally between circumcised and uncircumcised men) for their study which some interesting conclusions of their own.

 

I know Wikipedia isn't the best place to go for detailed info, but it had a nice little picture that explains how Foreskin Restoration works. Keep in mind though that that some of the procedures come with their own risks.

Edited September 16, 2010 by Caedus

[Mark Arbour]

Your sample was too small. That's a common hypothesis, one that this 2007 research article refutes. The researchers used 40 men (split equally between circumcised and uncircumcised men) for their study which some interesting conclusions of their own.

 

I know Wikipedia isn't the best place to go for detailed info, but it had a nice little picture that explains how Foreskin Restoration works. Keep in mind though that that some of the procedures come with their own risks.

 

The study says:

 

In response to the erotic stimulus, both groups evidenced a significant increase in penile temperature, which correlated highly with subjective reports of sexual arousal. Uncircumcised men had significantly lower penile temperature than circumcised men, and evidenced a larger increase in penile temperature with sexual arousal. No differences in genital sensitivity were found between the uncircumcised and circumcised groups. Uncircumcised men were less sensitive to touch on the forearm than circumcised men. A decrease in overall touch sensitivity was observed in both groups with exposure to the erotic film as compared with either baseline or control stimulus film conditions. No significant effect was found for pain sensitivity.

So a cut dick is a hotter dick?

[Caedus]

In the abstract, I believed they explained that they measured the sexual arousal of the participants with thermal imaging, which would mean that a cut dick gets more sexually aroused than an uncut dick.

[Mark Arbour]

In the abstract, I believed they explained that they measured the sexual arousal of the participants with thermal imaging, which would mean that a cut dick gets more sexually aroused than an uncut dick.

 

I'm not sure about that. They said the uncut dick was hotter, but the cut dick had a higher rate of increase in warmth with arousal.

[Canuk]

no wonder I had such a great time in Buffalo NY and Chicago Illinois...... my kinda guys!!

[Mark Arbour]

no wonder I had such a great time in Buffalo NY and Chicago Illinois...... my kinda guys!!

 

Or maybe you were just slutty.

[Caedus]

Hmm your right. Sorry, I'll look for some more sources.

 

I wonder if there's any more correlation between the levels of religous influence and the percentage of uncut dicks. Or maybe it's more to do with ones age since certain decades seemed to be more pro circumcision than others. In any case, cool chart!

[option]

I'm not sure about that. They said the uncut dick was hotter, but the cut dick had a higher rate of increase in warmth with arousal.

 

 

less to heat up

 

Hmm your right. Sorry, I'll look for some more sources.

 

I wonder if there's any more correlation between the levels of religous influence and the percentage of uncut dicks. Or maybe it's more to do with ones age since certain decades seemed to be more pro circumcision than others. In any case, cool chart!

 

 

there are medical reasons for circumcision, which can be at any age

[Canuk]

Or maybe you were just slutty.

 

 

hey,have you been speaking to my partner?????

 

that's his view of my time before him....... and there just may (not confessing to anything) be some truth.....

[Caedus]

@Option: Yeah, I know all about Phimosis (shudders).

[Wynter]

I'm no expert, but my understanding is that so long as you keep it clean there's no need for circumcision other than a preference for that appearance. Some people may suffer from particular conditions that make it beneficial but the majority of men don't need it at all.

 

This isn't the most academic discussions of circumcision but it's probably one of the more interesting

 

Pen and Teller on Circumcision

[JamieD]

I'm from Cali. And uncut lol. I don't know if either way is supposed to be better? Iv'e only seen a cut one live once and it was interesting but I don't care if they're cut or not..

Edited September 19, 2010 by JamieD

[option]

I'm no expert, but my understanding is that so long as you keep it clean there's no need for circumcision other than a preference for that appearance. Some people may suffer from particular conditions that make it beneficial but the majority of men don't need it at all.

 

This isn't the most academic discussions of circumcision but it's probably one of the more interesting

 

Pen and Teller on Circumcision

 

 

what utter crap

you have zero understanding of the subject, & are actually harmful by spouting such crap & mis-information

 

 

I was circumcised when i was 4/5 for medical reasons,

nothing to do with appearance,or being 'beneficial'

[Mark Arbour]

what utter crap

you have zero understanding of the subject, & are actually harmful by spouting such crap & mis-information

 

 

I was circumcised when i was 4/5 for medical reasons,

nothing to do with appearance,or being 'beneficial'

 

 

What did he say that was crap? I thought it sounded pretty reasonable. There's no reason for normal circumcision, unless there is a medical need: isn't that accurate?

 

 

[methodwriter85]

There isn't, but I do prefer cut dicks over uncut. I just like the look better.

[TetRefine]

As for looks, a hot dick is a hot dick. Whether it has a hood or not doesn't matter to me.

[option]

I'm no expert, but my understanding is that so long as you keep it clean there's no need for circumcision other than a preference for that appearance. Some people may suffer from particular conditions that make it beneficial but the majority of men don't need it at all.

 

This isn't the most academic discussions of circumcision but it's probably one of the more interesting

 

Pen and Teller on Circumcision

 

 

What did he say that was crap? I thought it sounded pretty reasonable. There's no reason for normal circumcision, unless there is a medical need: isn't that accurate?

 

 

 

he didnt say that though

 

 

 

 

the first sentence is contradicted by the 2nd, & they are both factually incorrect

 

 

1st sentence;

cleanliness & circumcision have nothing to do with each other

you can keep it as clean as possible, but still end up requiring a circumcision

 

 

2nd sentence;

suffer & beneficial

 

the sorts of medical conditions that require circumcision, you dont 'suffer' from, they arnt temporary, they dont come & go. you either have them or you dont. they arnt illnesses that you can catch.

circumcision, for medical reasons, is done as a neccesity, not because it might be beneficial.

 

if something is 'beneficial' it indicates a choice

eg; if you break your arm, painkillers may or may not be beneficial

the fixing of the break is however a neccesity

[Mark Arbour]

he didnt say that though

 

 

 

 

the first sentence is contradicted by the 2nd, & they are both factually incorrect

 

 

1st sentence;

cleanliness & circumcision have nothing to do with each other

you can keep it as clean as possible, but still end up requiring a circumcision

 

 

2nd sentence;

suffer & beneficial

 

the sorts of medical conditions that require circumcision, you dont 'suffer' from, they arnt temporary, they dont come & go. you either have them or you dont. they arnt illnesses that you can catch.

circumcision, for medical reasons, is done as a neccesity, not because it might be beneficial.

 

if something is 'beneficial' it indicates a choice

eg; if you break your arm, painkillers may or may not be beneficial

the fixing of the break is however a neccesity

 

I think you're nit-picking. I read your post and his and saw no appreciable difference in your positions. I'll let Wynter prove me wrong on that if he so desires.

 

There isn't, but I do prefer cut dicks over uncut. I just like the look better.

 

Are looks all that are important to you? What about taste?