Jump to content
  • entries
    27
  • comments
    217
  • views
    9,553

Calculating Pi... By Hand!


Today, we know π to well over the trillionth decimal place. It is a number that has shown up throughout mathematics, so it is no surprise that mathematicians have been dealing with the number for millennia.

 

The mathematicians of the Ancient world observed that the circumference of a circle was just over three times the diameter. So, they set out to estimate the value of π… and began a centuries long journey to take π from being “just over 3” to “3.14159265... etc.”

 

Throughout the world, various methods were devised to approximate π, however, the one I’ll be focusing on is the method developed by Archimedes.

 

He knew that the perimeter of an inscribed polygon would be less than the circumference, and the perimeter of a circumscribed polygon would be greater than the circumference.

 

So, he used this principle to work out a way in approximating π. He inscribed a hexagon on a circle, calculated the lengths of the hexagon’s sides, and then calculated its perimeter. He then doubled the sides of that hexagon, to get a dodecagon. And repeated the process of calculating its side length and perimeter.

 

And he repeated that process for a 24-gon, then a 48-gon, and finally a 96-gon.

 

Ah, but wait! He wasn’t done, because he then circumscribed a hexagon on the circle, and repeated the entire process. Archimedes was able to calculate the perimeters as 223/71 for the inscribed 96-gon and 22/7 for the circumscribed 96-gon.

 

Meaning, π was somewhere in between those two numbers, or in mathematical notation:

 

223/71 < π < 22/7

 

And since both fractions begin as 3.14 in decimal form, Archimedes found the first three digits of π.

 

******


While Archimedes, was the first to use this method, he certainly wasn’t the last. Which brings us to Ludolph van Ceulen, a Dutch mathematician from the 16th Century.

 

This man gave the most accurate approximation of π up to that point, all thanks to Archimedes’ method.

 

The only difference was that he started with a square, instead of a hexagon.

 

The following is to give you an idea of what he did:

 

gallery_24498_1791_1267.png

 

First, consider the circle above. We will be inscribing and circumscribing polygons on it.

 

gallery_24498_1791_486.png

 

The perimeter of the inscribed square is about 2.83, and that of the circumscribed square is 4. Which gives us the first inequality:

 

2.83 < π < 4

 

gallery_24498_1791_1890.png

 

The perimeter of the inscribed octagon is about 3.06, and that of the circumscribed octagon is about 3.31. Which gives us the second inequality:

 

3.06 < π < 3.31

 

gallery_24498_1791_14751.png

 

The perimeter of the inscribed hexadecagon (16-gon) is about 3.12, and that of the circumscribed 16-gon is about 3.18. Which gives us the third inequality:

 

3.12 < π < 3.18

 

As you can see, these inequalities hone in on π, eventually getting the digits of π as you continue doubling the sides of the inscribed and circumscribed polygons.

 

As for van Ceulen, he doubled the sides until he had 262-gons. And with that, he found π to the first 35 decimal places:

 

3.14159265358979323846264338327950288

 

This was an impressive achievement. So impressive in fact, that for a time, π was called the Ludolphine Number in Germany.

 

******


Of course, this record would be surpassed over the next couple centuries, when mathematicians began using infinite series to find π (where before they could only find tens of digits, they could now find hundreds).

 

And those records were broken during the last several decades, thanks to computers, and we now know π to well over a trillion decimal places.

 

We have certainly come a long way.

 

If you have any questions, I’ll be happy to answer them. :)

  • Like 15

16 Comments


Recommended Comments

Drew Espinosa

Posted (edited)

Note: I glossed over the more specific calculations, because they involve radicand, and well, the editor doesn't like them. :P So, I'll be adding those calculations separately as an image for the gallery, tomorrow.

Edited by Drew Espinosa
  • Like 2
northie

Posted

You lost me by the fourth paragraph or so. Which was exactly what I expected. :stupid::P

 

Some other clever, numerate people will doubtless follow you right through. *Sigh*

  • Like 3
Drew Espinosa

Posted

You lost me by the fourth paragraph or so. Which was exactly what I expected. :stupid::P Some other clever, numerate people will doubtless follow you right through. *Sigh*

Then I guess it's a good thing I couldn't add the more specific calculations... You probably would've been lost at the first glance.   :P

clochette

Posted

Very interesting.

We're so use to Pi being it's 3,14... that we dont think of how someone years, decades, centuries ago found it out.

I was lost after Archimedes trying to understand maths in English is out of my range :P

  • Like 3
Drew Espinosa

Posted

Very interesting. We're so use to Pi being it's 3,14... that we dont think of how someone years, decades, centuries ago found it out. I was lost after Archimedes trying to understand maths in English is out of my range :P

I know what you mean, many of us take for granted that pi's value was always known. :) And Clo, I wish I spoke French, because I would have translate this blog into French just for you. :hug:

  • Like 3
Ashi

Posted

You will be the cutest math teacher when you achieved all the credentials and started teaching.  All the geeky math students will be all gaga and smitten by you.  Great job posting this blog!

  • Like 5
Parker Owens

Posted

I enjoyed this description of Archimedes' and Ludolph's work. I shall look forward to seeing the calculations. And what stodgy editor didn't like radicals? Such an irrational attitude...

  • Like 2
Drew Espinosa

Posted

I enjoyed this description of Archimedes' and Ludolph's work. I shall look forward to seeing the calculations. And what stodgy editor didn't like radicals? Such an irrational attitude...

Thank you Parker, I'm flattered that you enjoyed it!

 

You will be the cutest math teacher when you achieved all the credentials and started teaching.  All the geeky math students will be all gaga and smitten by you.  Great job posting this blog!

Thank you Ashi!

  • Like 1
spike382

Posted

I was with you till you said Archimedes. Math doesn't get along with me past a certain point.

  • Like 1
Timothy M.

Posted

I can remember being told the story about Archimedes years ago in school. Before there was anything such as personal computers. :lol: I can't recall if van Ceulen got in there too, so that was cool to read about. Thanks, Drew.

  • Like 2
dughlas

Posted

Remedial math with pi, thanks Drew.

  • Like 1
  • Site Administrator
wildone

Posted

Huh :huh:

 

:read:

  • Like 2
Drew Espinosa

Posted

I was with you till you said Archimedes. Math doesn't get along with me past a certain point.

I understand, spikey. Ironically, while I'm good at math, especially with the theoretical aspects, I don't get along with certain sciene fields (like Chemistry) beyond a certain point.

 

I can remember being told the story about Archimedes years ago in school. Before there was anything such as personal computers. :lol: I can't recall if van Ceulen got in there too, so that was cool to read about. Thanks, Drew.

You're welcome Tim! :)

 

Remedial math with pi, thanks Drew.

You're welcome Dugh! :)

 

Huh :huh:

 

:read:

I wonder what your reaction would be if you saw the calculations. :lol:

Palantir

Posted

AND - commendations to you Drew for this mind project you've undertaken and followed through.

The world needs enquiring minds like yours.

  • Like 2
Drew Espinosa

Posted

AND - commendations to you Drew for this mind project you've undertaken and followed through.

The world needs enquiring minds like yours.

Thank you Palantir! :)

drown

Posted

I clicked the π in your signature, thinking it might be the Praetorians from The Net (I really like Sandra Bullock). But instead I just spend 15 minutes with math. :D Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...