Let's see, I'm a pretty odd religiously.
I have had more or less Catholic background; not "confirmed" and I have strong issues with the way the church is conducted under the traditional stagnant backdrop. I also have a background in Baptist teachings, they are very strong believers and I can understand how that might rub people the wrong way. I did not agree with Baptist principles of "salvation" through Christ; technically, I could not accept the thought that any merciful God would condemn anyone that may not choose to believe in a particular set of principles.
As a Chinese boy growing up, I was influenced by Daoist principles and Buddhism. Most people don't really believe in them as religions, but they do observe the holidays and traditional stories. I actually enjoy the Daoist histories a lot; Daoism is one of the world's first scientific association. The early founders of Daoist thought practice observational natural science: recording chemical reaction, Astronomy, Engineering, and offered other insights into the natural world. Later on, the group did betray many of its founding principles and incorporated polytheism with less emphasis on scientific exploration. However, I think the concepts were still remarkable along with their clarity of thought in terms of the nature of existence and the nature of God (Yes, it's complicated, but the Daoist do have a non-corporeal belief in a unified entity God). Later on, I learned about early Hinduism in history class, my favorite history teacher in middle school and I talked about everything about the nature of the singular God concept in different ancient and modern religions. I was hooked. I spent a lot of time in middle school, high school, and college discussing with my history teachers the finer points of civilizations and philosophy. I have not met a history teacher or professor that I cannot talk with about the nature of civilizations. Some of them were class conflict historians, structural historians, social historians, neo-classical historians, and others sub-disciplines of history.
You can say, my knowledge of religious thought is kind of connected with my love of history.
Today, I don't know what I can be considered as. I believe that there is a God, but I would consider him/her/it an internalized entity of our spirit, an incorporeal form of nature. I think the closest religion would be Quaker tradition for me, who also believe in an internalized God with less emphasis on the practices or traditions.
I am not a big fan of organized religion, who I view have diverted their search for spiritual meaning in order to pursue more worldly aims and political power. I don't agree with the use of traditions and practices that hinder a person's free will.