Jump to content

blogage

  • entries
    139
  • comments
    526
  • views
    59,702

Shut your effin mouth already


Shawn is bad.

 

Who is Shawn? Hell if I know, but what I do know is I don't like Shawn very much; he nor his cohorts. He is just one of the millions of people world wide that think just because they have an opinion they should share it.

 

First of all Shawn, Shut the F@#$ up!

 

I get it, you think it's a sin; great the majority of the world agrees with you. Yet, who benefits from your assertions that it is a sin? You? Surely not you're straight so it shouldn't matter. The people that would rather not hear you spout off? Take a hint they're not listening. Future generations? Well with it being a sin and all they will just have to kill themselves; oh wait, that's a sin too, so is lying and a whole litany of other crap. Well, might as well get to hell early and get a good seat right?

 

My point is this: No one benefits from you asserting that opinion, nothing good comes from it, so again refer to the line above telling you to shut your pie hole.

 

Beh, I had a whole blog typed out, and the above is all I saved from it.

 

I guess I'm really angry with Shawn because, well because he reminds me of my mother.

 

the two of us had anothr interesting conversation Friday night. Which jumped around, but always skirted the "gay agenda".

 

She brought it up I didn't. We were discussing history, and how much of what is taught regaring American history is either skewed or an outright lie. Then she went into a fit over the theory of Abraham Lincoln possibly being gay.

 

So what if he was? would that tid-bit detract from his presedency? Would it nullafy his stance on Slavery, quash his words in the Gettysburg Address or his second Inagural? No. But there isn't any concrete proof he was; only peoples assumptins over a few close fiendships he maintaned.

 

She went on to say that she wil never buy anything from Dolche and Gabana. While I agree I will never buy anything from Dolce and Gabana we differ on reasons.

 

Me: Their stuff is crap

Her: They feature two same sex couples kissing in their tv ad.

 

Kids shouldnt be subjected to that don't you know? was her argument. I countered with, then again it might be good for the kid out there that thinks he is odd, that thinks he's a freak.

 

Anyhow it degraded to the point Im yelling at that dipshit Shawn above.

 

The bible says so... yeah she went there again, Just like she always does. Should I mntion now that she doesn't go to Church, doesn't read the bible with any regularity.

 

I chewed away at that reason too. Leviticus prohibits it, yet Jesus quashed the Laws of Leviticus.

 

Somehow it all led to her saying Hiter was gay...

 

WTF? why can Hitler be gay and not Lincoln?

 

I don't think she realized the allusion she made.

 

I don't think she realizes how her words kill another piece of me everytime she does this. I want to be angry with her, I just can't.

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

Former Member

Posted

Ugh, my mom's boyfriend is like that, I usually end up just rapidly changing the subject whenever he gets into a spiel.

viv

Posted

I LOVE the D&G ad even though I have absolutely NO idea what specific product they are trying to sell, and I could care less. I think it was a great ad to run.

 

I'll pick your mom up and take her out to lunch... and then I'll take her for a complimentary "removal of head from assectomy" that comes free with every meal with Viv...

 

Seriously, I know she pisses you off, and I *KNOW* it hurts you... but she's not got it all together when it comes to this subject, and one day when she says "Kids shouldnt be subjected to that..." you can tell her that I would "subject" my kids to it EVERY day for the opportunity to know that my kids know that it's okay to love who you want to love and to show that person how you feel.

 

Also, one of these days when she's saying that shit, which it is, and is trying to argue with you about it, and you say to her, "So, I guess what I'm hearing is that you think I'm sick and that no children should ever be subjected to me, and that I don't deserve the right to love whomever I choose to love and spend my life with? Is that really what you think of me?"

 

And I know the answer terrifies you, but if she says the wrong thing, she's gonna have me inher living room telling her what a total moron she is and there's room here in my house with my kids who I'd gladly subject to you daily...

 

I love you, Steve, and I think you're a fantastic man... and I think, she does, too. She's just afraid and confused and needs to figure out what's important and right here, and I can't think of a better man to teach her how confused and ridiculous she is.

 

Love,

Your Doll :wub:

Conner

Posted

If I go to hell, I'm getting there early enough to get a suite, not a seat.....so I can entertain all the 'hot' gay dudes.

 

:lol:

  • Site Administrator
Graeme

Posted

:hug: Sorry that you've had to go through that, Steve. If you want a copy of a "liberal" interpretation of the bible and homosexuality that I did a couple of years ago, just let me know. It's a summary of what's on the Religious Tolerance web site.

 

The thing I find saddest (though also slightly amusing) are the people use Leviticus as saying lesbianism is sinful. Leviticus clearly talks about men laying with men as with a women (ie. anal intercourse). How that indicates that two women having sex is sinful is beyond me....

Masked Monkey

Posted

7th circle, inner ring ... see you there ... particularly since the "sodomotes" get to walk around on the burning sand in "groups" ... can you say ORGY in HELL

 

:king: Dr. Mr. Snow "Snoopy" Dog

 

OH, and if I get the teaching position in CA you can live with me instead of her 0:)

C James

Posted

Ouch...

 

Sorry that happened, Steve.

 

Ugh, I don't know what else to say except that a good retort for "the bible says so" is to demand "where". Interestingly, I find that shuts up around half of claimants. "Leviticus" is the usual answer from the rest, and that can open up some great fun

when you ask questions about some of Leviticus's more colorful pronouncements, such as it being okay to own slaves, provided they are from neighboring nations. Or that the eaters of shellfish are accursed before god? (God Hates Shrimp!). And what to do about a blind or crippled man who enters a church. If we believe Leviticus, should we stone them to death, or would a simple burning at the stake suffice?

(he does call them an abomination, after all). Remember, the only claim they can make regarding literal interpretation is that dietary laws no longer apply (dang, there goes God Hates Shrimp) but little gems like the slavery issue and the blind or crippled being abominations aren't dietary. Those who claim that Leviticus' "moral laws" still apply need to take a close look at those issues. There's also the larger issue of anyone seeking to impose their religious beliefs on others: That's always wrong, and you can always name the most famous person who has that philosophy. a man by the name of Osama Bin Laden.

 

It's also fun to throw in the bit from the new testament where Paul says that if you're circumcised you're Jewish. :)

 

Exposing the claimant's ignorance of the biblical laws they themselves are referring to is a wonderful opening to suggest that they should pound on the good book a little less, and instead, actually read it on occasion. (If they are going to cite it, it behoves them to at least have a clue what they're talking about).

 

Sorry for rambling, but I live in an area where I get confronted by "biblical claims" a LOT. Grrrr.

 

This probably doesn;t help you with your mother, and I wish I could think of something that would.

Best Wishes,

CJ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...