i'm struggling a lot with this lately as well.
(okay kids. let's keep in mind: this is billy plus a bottle of wine talking.)
the more i read, the more i want to do away with terms "masculine," "feminine," "gay-acting," "straight-acting," etc.
but then i don't.
race and racism suffers a similar dilemma. here's why:
on the one hand difference creates room for oppression. as soon as one thing is different than another, there is always a type of person who will say that one is better than the other. but on the other hand, i like difference because hey, we ARE gay. in this time and culture, that sets us apart. why shouldn't we have our own culture.
(then i wonder: in the future, would i still want my sexuality to be enough to set me apart so much that i want it to make me part of a culture?)
i've been avoiding calling people flamboyant or passing as straight because i don't like everything that it implies as stated above: it makes flamboyance a bad thing, it operates on a standardized definition of masculinity, and it encourages homophobia.
i do this, yet when i go out in public, i look for all the stereotypes when i hope to hit on someone.
so i'm trying to eliminate the same linguistic phenomenon that i use when i "hunt."
recent example: new twenty-two year old manager at work has a slightly "gay" voice and sure i've got my eye on him.
but then i'm part of the group of people who doesn't want voice to be any indicator of sexuality.
what to dooooooo?