NaperVic Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 I'm surprised none of the P.W.'s pointed this fact out. Wow, that's a lot. It seemed like only yesterday that Kurt was pointing out the 50k mark. Take Care®, Vic (who can't believe he posted about post counts..ack, the next CJ or Beastkid)
Benji Posted January 3, 2008 Posted January 3, 2008 I'm surprised none of the P.W.'s pointed this fact out. Wow, that's a lot. It seemed like only yesterday that Kurt was pointing out the 50k mark. Take Care
Site Administrator Graeme Posted January 3, 2008 Site Administrator Posted January 3, 2008 I never noticed. That's not a statistics I pay much attention to. However, congratulations to everyone who has helped GA reach that point That's a lot of chatting and conversing between members, and that shows a great community. Thank you to all of you -- even the lurkers who haven't posted anything. You're part of this community too
Menzoberranzen Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 I never noticed. That's not a statistics I pay much attention to. However, congratulations to everyone who has helped GA reach that point That's a lot of chatting and conversing between members, and that shows a great community. Thank you to all of you -- even the lurkers who haven't posted anything. You're part of this community too You are the internet equivalent of the curtain-twitching old lady who never leaves the house...
Krista Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 Hmm.. aren't y'all a talkative bunch.. Good job. Krista
Menzoberranzen Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 Hmm.. aren't y'all a talkative bunch.. Says the 16th most prolific poster of them all
rknapp Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 I'm surprised none of the P.W.'s pointed this fact out. Startling though that may be, I'm sure they'll turn up shortly.
old bob Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 However, congratulations to everyone who has helped GA reach that point That's a lot of chatting and conversing between members, and that shows a great community. Thank you to all of you -- even the lurkers who haven't posted anything. You're part of this community too Really, we are a great community, but not so big as it seems. 100'000 posts in 426 days, or 235 posts a day, its a lot, but look who participate : 18 members with more than 1'000 posts (you can imagine who !) 22 members between 1'000 and 500, 30 members between 500 and 250, 58 members between 100 and 250 122 members between 30 and 100 2'081 members between 1 and 30 2'490 members with 0 post. The posting community is less than 2/1000 of all members and the 18 top postalcoholics (with more than 1'000 posts) are responsible for the 36,2 % of all posts . It would be interesting to introduce an effectiveness-factor to appreciate each post, giving more "weight" to those which really mean something and bring a plus to the community. IMO, I could imagine that, with this calculation, the "posting" participation would be less than 0,001 of all members .
C James Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 I'm surprised none of the P.W.'s pointed this fact out. Wow, that's a lot. It seemed like only yesterday that Kurt was pointing out the 50k mark. Take Care
Site Administrator Graeme Posted January 4, 2008 Site Administrator Posted January 4, 2008 Thanks Graeme, for making even us lurkers feel welcome. I knew you were going to respond to that line, but I was feeling in a generous mood and left it in Thanks for the stats, Bob!! But, umm, It's about 1720 days, becuase GA is about 4 1/2 years old. That means it's about 58 posts a dayon average. Hrmm, that must mean it was slower back at the beginning, because Greame alone posts more than that a day now. Actually, I've never come close to 58 posts in a day. There's only two people I can think of who have... one of them being C James
BeaStKid Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 .....You know, I was noticing last Monday?...I think that it was up at @ 99,000..Then I just forgot about it I noticed it too but forgot about it... Anyways... To all GA-folks...
CoLeYy Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 WHOOO HOOO!!!!!!!! GO G.A!!!!! congrats everyone
FrenchCanadian Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 I knew you were going to respond to that line, but I was feeling in a generous mood and left it in Actually, I've never come close to 58 posts in a day. There's only two people I can think of who have... one of them being C James Hasn't he done that at more than one time? just imagine what it would be if he weren't a shy lurker WHOOO HOOO!!!!!!!! GO G.A!!!!! congrats everyone Exactly, Congrats everyone for making the forums as fun as it is now! And by the way, so what if there's only a few of us that have 1,000 and that after there's a gap,, it always takes those people who "over" post to start the conversations.
Tiger Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 Really, we are a great community, but not so big as it seems.100'000 posts in 426 days, or 235 posts a day, its a lot, but look who participate : 18 members with more than 1'000 posts (you can imagine who !) 122 members between 30 and 100 2'081 members between 1 and 30 2'490 members with 0 post. The posting community is less than 2/1000 of all members and the 18 top postalcoholics (with more than 1'000 posts) are responsible for the 36,2 % of all posts . It would be interesting to introduce an effectiveness-factor to appreciate each post, giving more "weight" to those which really mean something and bring a plus to the community. IMO, I could imagine that, with this calculation, the "posting" participation would be less than 0,001 of all members . I'm among the 122. I'm working on getting to 100. It takes time. Please, be patient!
Site Administrator Graeme Posted January 4, 2008 Site Administrator Posted January 4, 2008 And by the way, so what if there's only a few of us that have 1,000 and that after there's a gap,, it always takes those people who "over" post to start the conversations. Strangely, I don't start that many conversations. I tend to react, rather than being proactive. I've always been that way, even since I started here.
Meeko Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 Strangely, I don't start that many conversations. I tend to react, rather than being proactive. I've always been that way, even since I started here. I tend to do a little of both, but only with reasons!
Tiger Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 Strangely, I don't start that many conversations. I tend to react, rather than being proactive. I've always been that way, even since I started here. I think I have started one thread. Usually, I react as well.
BeaStKid Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 I tend to do a little of both, but only with reasons! Same for me... I little of both... But it's mostly reacting...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now