Jump to content

Writing Modern Fantasy


Recommended Posts

  • 8 months later...
Posted

To me, the general rules of good story telling always apply, even with Fantasy and to SF. One of the best that I've used over the years is: the central characters have to want something. For example, Harry Potter wants to stop Voldemort and avenge his parents' deaths. To me, this is pretty straightforward. Everything else is just window-dressing, whether the characters have powers or there's some other fantastic element.

 

I like the fact that in J.K. Rowling's case, she spent almost a year setting down rules and limitations of the characters' power, and religiously stuck to them throughout the novels. For example, the wizards' power could not bring somebody back from the dead, nor could it create a living thing (particularly something as basic as food). Without the limitations, you wind up with characters who have no weaknesses, and it doesn't make for a very interesting story.

 

I find that often, the characters' weaknesses and flaws can be pivotal, particularly when they find ways to overcome them (or wind up with enormous problems because of them). In some cases, the solutions are not magical at all, but boil down to something as simple as friendship, loyalty, courage, even love. Tolkien's work is filled with stuff like this, where the adventure of the story boiled down to bravery, not necessarily any special powers. Sometimes, when the hero's power fails is when they're tested the most: Superman facing Kryptonite, a vampire threatened by the blinding sun, Harry Potter having a duel with Voldemort. I think the magic is often in the emotion of the character, and how they change over time. 

Posted

Well-said. Flawed characters are the best. If I can add, the limitations should not only be restricted to the powers but also with the personality of the characters also. Continuing the example of Harry, he was a simple boy with horrible mood swings (remember the rage bursts in book 5) and dealing with the everyday little problems that we all face. He wasn't the most intelligent, the most beautiful. Like he said in book 1, he was "Harry, just Harry." 

 

A well-rounded character should have flaws. And qualities of course. 

 

Really interesting topic.

 

Cheers

Ieshwar

  • Like 2
Posted

Well-said. Flawed characters are the best. If I can add, the limitations should not only be restricted to the powers but also with the personality of the characters also. Continuing the example of Harry, he was a simple boy with horrible mood swings (remember the rage bursts in book 5) and dealing with the everyday little problems that we all face.

 

Yes, I thought Book 5 (Order of the Phoenix) was the best book overall, and I was floored that the movie completely eliminated Harry's terrible outburst where he pretty much destroyed Dumbledore's office after finding out that he would have to die in order to defeat Voldemort. It was a powerful moment that never happened in the movie. 

 

I thought one of the greatest character flaws revealed in the Harry Potter stories was the revelation that Harry's own father was a jerk, and had tormented teenage Snape (hanging him upside down and pulling off his pants, if memory serves). I think these shadings showed that many of the characters were more well-rounded than we initially expected -- even the discovery that Snape was pitiable and very human. 

 

Twilight doesn't do much for me. To me, it's just a modern spin on the Anne Rice books, many of which I think were very well done. I particularly dislike Stephenie Meyer's breaking of all known vampire rules: having them walk in the sun, seen by mirrors, crosses having no effect, vampires having sex, and so on. To me, it's just ludicrous -- but clearly, there's a huge audience for this crap. Hunger Games at least makes some kind of vague logical sense to me.

  • Site Administrator
Posted

Blending the expected bits of modern society with your fantasy is vital when you cross genres. Fantasy characters need to feel human to readers to make them relatable. Adding in foibles or characteristics we can understand can make them someone/thing we can understand. Determining the rules of your world and how they can be like ours, and how they differ, is vital so you can explain those elements. Fantasy can let men be pregnant, or make a rabbit talk, or blend a person and animal into a new species... but above all, it must make sense. That angle is a bit different than what I was intending the discussion on this to be, however, you can find other discussions on follow the 'rules' of  our world on GA too. They're both important elements to creating a great story.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...