wep363 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 NEW YORK (Reuters) - British actor Daniel Radcliffe hopes to debut on Broadway next year in a reprise of his London role in "Equus," a performance where he shed not only his clothes but the mantle of Harry Potter. I bet this show will be a HOT ticket.
colinian Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 If horses turn you on lol Aw, Daniel's not that big! Colin
Site Administrator Graeme Posted September 6, 2007 Site Administrator Posted September 6, 2007 Aw, Daniel's not that big! And how, exactly, do you know that?
BeaStKid Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 And how, exactly, do you know that? I'd like to know tht too....
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 I'd like to know tht too.... ............Still thats gotta take a lot of guts to perform in the natural!!
Demetz Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 How long t ill more of the SoccerMom/PastorDave types pop up and threaten to boycott harry potter... again?
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 How long t ill more of the SoccerMom/PastorDave types pop up and threaten to boycott harry potter... again? ......Your right you know, I suppose the evil soccerery made Daniel do it
Menzoberranzen Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 I saw Equus in London, and it was incredible, although I must say that I'm not particularly enamored of Daniel Radcliffe. Menzo PS He really isn't overly well endowed.
D Writes Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 I saw Equus in London, and it was incredible, although I must say that I'm not particularly enamored of Daniel Radcliffe. Menzo PS He really isn't overly well endowed. He isn't?? Gee, I think he should have done some hocus-pocus to equip himself with some favourable tools
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 He isn't?? Gee, I think he should have done some hocus-pocus to equip himself with some favourable tools .............Humm, I always wondered about that wand he used!
wep363 Posted September 6, 2007 Author Posted September 6, 2007 PS He really isn't overly well endowed. That could be....but i did hear he has some nice ASSets.
Site Moderator TalonRider Posted September 6, 2007 Site Moderator Posted September 6, 2007 He isn't?? Gee, I think he should have done some hocus-pocus to equip himself with some favourable tools Maybe we should leave that up to Myr, and other, who write HP fanfic. If you haven't checked out Myr's version, you should especially POD. You can find a link to Myr's stories in my signature below. Jan
Ieshwar Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Wow, we seem to be talking about boy wands, ASSets and hot things over here. But I must say that Daniel looked hot in the posters for equus. And he wasn't bad at all in OoP. Many complained that they preferred him in long hair. But I like him in short hair too. With the checked shirt and pants. Very common-looking. Guys, wasn't that hot? He looked so mature! I wanted to go in and hug him. (and do more things of course!) He's good, really good at some places. Take care, Ieshwar P.S I hope they leave him in peace so that he can do a nude scene in a movie and satisfy guys like me out here!
D Writes Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 OMG!! Ieshwar!! Control your teenage hormones
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 OMG!! Ieshwar!! Control your teenage hormones .......Now I understand why Radcliffe is nervous, it's Ieshwar's fault!
D Writes Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 .......Now I understand why Radcliffe is nervous, it's Ieshwar's fault! OMFG!! ROFLMAO!! You guys crack me up
Dalmatia Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Aw, Daniel's not that big! Colin I was referring to the fact that he does quite a few things to horses during the play...
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 I was referring to the fact that he does quite a few things to horses during the play... HUH!!
Dalmatia Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Maybe some else could explain it to you.... or you could go see it
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Maybe some else could explain it to you.... or you could go see it ........Well since I'm not going to be in New York anytime soon in the next century, Why don't YOU explain!
Menzoberranzen Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 I was referring to the fact that he does quite a few things to horses during the play... I believe it was a joke. Yes, believe it or not, Dan's assests, wands and other features were not the main attraction of this play. It's a very intense, dark production, with plenty of talent and a phenomenal portrayal of a very troubled human being. Menzo
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 I believe it was a joke. Yes, believe it or not, Dan's assests, wands and other features were not the main attraction of this play. It's a very intense, dark production, with plenty of talent and a phenomenal portrayal of a very troubled human being. Menzo ..........Aha! thanks, you have no idea what was going thru my head :wacko:
Menzoberranzen Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 ..........Aha! thanks, you have no idea what was going thru my head :wacko: If it had anything to do with a quasi-sexual, sadistic obsession with horses, then you were right on the mark.
Benji Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 If it had anything to do with a quasi-sexual, sadistic obsession with horses, then you were right on the mark. .........Now your b.s me!! LOL
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now