Krista

You can cry, I'll be snockered off my ass.

Don't burn your biscuits, Wildthing, you're Canadian you're not used to that.

I am a total comics fraud. I only know about the X-men through the films and I have never watched or felt inclined to watch any other film franchise about superheroes/comics.

Not that I want the hotwings, I'm sure the husband will appreciate them. But I originally posted: I asked ChatGPT this question. It told me that it didn't know who you were. So, I gave it snippets of our conversations and it sort of glitched out, then gave me the skull and crossbones emoji, then a winky-face. I didn't ask it to clarify, didn't think I needed to. --- This story may or may not be true, you can ask it. It might confess.

Edited: The angel on my shoulder got the better of me. Rare, but it happens. Edit x2: Oh NO! It was reacted to before the edit. So now there's a witness.. lol oh well.

With how lazy journalism has gotten I just figured it was mostly done by AI these days. It does show that people aren't worried about it until it comes knocking on their door though. The thing with AI is, when it comes knocking on your door, it has already surpassed you. You're just finding out that it has. So yeah.

I did give ChatGPT 'Ghost of the Watikan' for analysis, then it offered to make what it called a pivotal image scene: I think it did the scene decently. One character is nude in this scene, but of course ChatGPT won't do that. And he has shorter hair, but when I prompt it to edit, it makes them look like twins. This one is the only one that made them look distinctly different. But it was based on my writing, character descriptions, and so on. That tree is massive though, good thing it is cropped. It even represented the game trail. I would've liked the ranger to show himself a bit more aware and less casual. He looks like he's discussing the weather... and not meeting a werewolf for the first time.

Yeah I had a long drawn-out thing with ChatGPT with mixed results depending on prompts. It was able to name that I was a GA author, knew the genres I am known to write. It was able to name a few characters and story titles. When I started asking for specific story break downs, blurbs, analysis it started getting things wrong. Even if it got the characters correct not a few prompts before, it seemed to struggle. When I corrected it, it admitted that it doesn't have access to my writing specifically, that I would need to share my writing in order for it to actually be helpful and not structure an analysis based on 'generalizations.' It says the word count it can handle per prompt is 10k. It told me it is limited to accessing writing if it is behind a secure log-in, paywall, etc. It did know who Mark Arbour, Dom, DanKirk, and Comicality were though when I asked it about GayAuthors specifically. Author lists are general public knowledge, but those are the authors it listed outright. I didn't prompt it to explain what genres anyone wrote under or anything specific. I have made it analyze, "Ridley," though, it was insightful to say the least. I posted some of those results. I was doing the prompts as a guest and not logged in though, it may be different if I cared to log-in. I'll have to see if there is a concrete difference it what it will/can give me. Edited to add: I asked it today and it gave me a more comprehensive list of authors. All Signature authors were listed. I'd have to be more of an avid reader to know if it got all the genres or 'known for' genres correct or not. I doubt that it did, as it struggled with mine until I told it through various corrections. Promising Authors were also listed, but it excluded Classic authors with the series of prompts I gave it. It did say my writing aligns more with Comicality and Headstall. Entirely based on similar genre/sub genre prompts, I'm assuming. It also said, "The Best Year," was my best story. Which is totally based on statistics that it could pull from GA as a source material.

Good luck y'all. Be sneaky... and all that. I'll be uninvolved. Probably.

I do not think I've touched the information in my profile for over a decade. Yikes.

Maybe, just maybe you will hear the recording of Jeff's little giggle right before, you know, the getting part of the evening. I do not have shoelaces on most of my shoes. I do have them on one pair of hiking boots and the one pair of hunting boots that was given to me by my husband in a moment of delusional optimism to think I'd be going enough times to need them, and would be a good hunting buddy when he got me there. He learned his lesson. As will others, I'm thinking, in their own time I suppose. This, take notes. This goes a long way, learn from this. ---- I'm sure I can pawn y'all off on Wildthing or maybe the highest bidder. Who knows.

Dark mode. I cannot stand to read digitally for very long without switching.

Oh, well if you're in misery already I'll save the travel points and wait until you've seen the clouds break and the sunshine again. I do hope you feel better. You're already 7 days into this break, I think I read that somewhere. Is it pain or are you feeling side-effects? I hope you're behaving yourself. I find it difficult to believe that you can behave, but hopeful that you are.

Oh my goodness me. Why? I think I felt my brain shift inward to hide from the attempt I asked it to make in reading that. --- Also, @Jason Rimbaud You physically cannot run. You're down a foot. It must be the medication that prompted you to risk this

You're 1 out of 3, so you're likely safe unless Bald is the top defining factor.