BeaStKid Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 .......Who the hell is that?? well, if it were Hindi...dost means friend... But I'm sure Steve doesn't know Hindi... Beats me then...
Tiger Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 you forgot dost... Finally, some back-up to aid me with the Beauty Shop Gossip Queens. My hero.
BeaStKid Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 Finally, some back-up to aid me with the Beauty Shop Gossip Queens. My hero.
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 Finally, some back-up to aid me with the Beauty Shop Gossip Queens. My hero. ...........The king of cliffhangers
Tiger Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 ...........The king of cliffhangers At least, he is not part of the dynamic duo known as "The Beauty Shop Gossip Queens!"
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 At least, he is not part of the dynamic duo known as "The Beauty Shop Gossip Queens!" ................BK, your honor is at stake (I have none)
BeaStKid Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 ................BK, your honor is at stake (I have none) let him gloat...we know what we are...and gossip queens is not one of them!! It is a discussion board, after all. We do discuss random things at times...
Tiger Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 ................BK, your honor is at stake (I have none) I shall keep that in mind. Rest assured that I will not tolerate my honor being impugned.
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 I shall keep that in mind. Rest assured that I will not tolerate my honor being impugned. .....Now, now sir, your honor is intact, however I thought you were ready to mount a goat!!
Tiger Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 .....Now, now sir, your honor is intact, however I thought you were ready to mount a goat!! Rest assured that I do not participate in such lude activities.
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 Rest assured that I do not participate in such lude activities. ..........CJ will be relieved
Tiger Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 ..........CJ will be relieved I'll be taking the old goat to my taxidermist. The only mounting involves the old goat's head being mounted above the mantle of my fireplace.
shadowgod Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 sigh try to help someone out and they attack you unduely... "Methinks thou DOST protest too much" I still haven't recieved an answer to the question on how a person could be considered a King of something when: 1) people do not think he uses an absurd ammount of said thing. 2) people do not think any particular one was as evil as certain caprian factions would have the population believe. 3) people have seen instances of these things perpitraited by others far worse then they have seen done so by this so called king. 4) CJ agreed (on the record, and I have archives so he can edit as much as he likes and I WILL just change it back) that with out a proper vote of GA as a whole and pitting against authors as deserving as I, That I'd have to set aside the moniker. So until the vote That said, who wouldn't want the title of King, I just want to know its mine fair and square and not given as part in some back room deal. I think that is only fair don't you?
BeaStKid Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 sigh try to help someone out and they attack you unduely... "Methinks thou DOST protest too much" Oh! 2) people do not think any particular one was as evil as certain caprian factions would have the population believe. Hey I'm a Caprican and I never said that you use evil cliffies!!! They are interesting, but not cliffies... esp. the one in question, LiS 26
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 sigh try to help someone out and they attack you unduely... "Methinks thou DOST protest too much" I still haven't recieved an answer to the question on how a person could be considered a King of something when: 1) people do not think he uses an absurd ammount of said thing. 2) people do not think any particular one was as evil as certain caprian factions would have the population believe. 3) people have seen instances of these things perpitraited by others far worse then they have seen done so by this so called king. 4) CJ agreed (on the record, and I have archives so he can edit as much as he likes and I WILL just change it back) that with out a proper vote of GA as a whole and pitting against authors as deserving as I, That I'd have to set aside the moniker. So until the vote That said, who wouldn't want the title of King, I just want to know its mine fair and square and not given as part in some back room deal. I think that is only fair don't you? ............Me attack!!! No,of course not!! long live the King!! (However, I wouldn't have chosen a goat for Queen)
Tiger Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 sigh try to help someone out and they attack you unduely... "Methinks thou DOST protest too much" I still haven't recieved an answer to the question on how a person could be considered a King of something when: 1) people do not think he uses an absurd ammount of said thing. 2) people do not think any particular one was as evil as certain caprian factions would have the population believe. 3) people have seen instances of these things perpitraited by others far worse then they have seen done so by this so called king. 4) CJ agreed (on the record, and I have archives so he can edit as much as he likes and I WILL just change it back) that with out a proper vote of GA as a whole and pitting against authors as deserving as I, That I'd have to set aside the moniker. So until the vote That said, who wouldn't want the title of King, I just want to know its mine fair and square and not given as part in some back room deal. I think that is only fair don't you? I implore thee to construct a poll in one of the forums. The poll shall reconcile the all important issue of said title.
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 I implore thee to construct a poll in one of the forums. The poll shall reconcile the all important issue of said title. ......There are several polls already out there, look in Shadowg_d's forum....also C James....and vote!!
shadowgod Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 Hey I'm a Caprican and I never said that you use evil cliffies!!! They are interesting, but not cliffies... esp. the one in question, LiS 26 That is why I said cerian Caprian Fractions. This scandal is in no way indicitive of caprians as a whole, and I do not intend it to be read as such. That would be stereotyping, and I don't do that well much... Me attack!!! No,of course not!! long live the King!! (However, I wouldn't have chosen a goat for Queen) Please re-read item #4. I implore thee to construct a poll in one of the forums. The poll shall reconcile the all important issue of said title It's coming, not today But I have faith either that CJ is afraid of not being able to micro manage the results. There are several polls already out there, look in Shadowg_d's forum....also C James....and vote!! True however, these polls , as agreed upon by the goat himself, are worded to skew results plus as per the agreement they fail to include the multitudes of other fine authors we have round here.
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 Please re-read item #4. .......I seem to remember well while the goat was away, the kidds all played, did we not award him that askewed title?
shadowgod Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 Please re-read item #4. .......I seem to remember well while the goat was away, the kidds all played, did we not award him that askewed title? you all may have, I'm not a kidd and had no hand in it That said, I have no problem discounting the results of that poll either. Though the results of that poll are no way as contradictory as the other poll, whose results clearly don't add up ( ref items 1 & 2 above).
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 you all may have, I'm not a kidd and had no hand in it That said, I have no problem discounting the results of that poll either. Though the results of that poll are no way as contradictory as the other poll, whose results clearly don't add up ( ref items 1 & 2 above). ...............But surely you acknowledged the results (see post's #122 & #151 of Is CJ the Queen of all Evil Cliffhangers) You mean you did not vote :wacko:
shadowgod Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 ...............But surely you acknowledged the results (see post's #122 & #151 of Is CJ the Queen of all Evil Cliffhangers) You mean you did not vote :wacko: I did not acknowledge the vote results until after CJ had returned, and then I was only imploring him to embrace his title just as he implored me to do so. What someone sees as good advice should be returned in kind no?
Benji Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 I did not acknowledge the vote results until after CJ had returned, and then I was only imploring him to embrace his title just as he implored me to do so. What someone sees as good advice should be returned in kind no? ...........But of course, you being the gentleman just returning CJ's compliments.
C James Posted January 7, 2008 Posted January 7, 2008 sigh try to help someone out and they attack you unduely... "Methinks thou DOST protest too much" I still haven't recieved an answer to the question on how a person could be considered a King of something when: 1) people do not think he uses an absurd ammount of said thing. 2) people do not think any particular one was as evil as certain caprian factions would have the population believe. 3) people have seen instances of these things perpitraited by others far worse then they have seen done so by this so called king. 4) CJ agreed (on the record, and I have archives so he can edit as much as he likes and I WILL just change it back) that with out a proper vote of GA as a whole and pitting against authors as deserving as I, That I'd have to set aside the moniker. So until the vote That said, who wouldn't want the title of King, I just want to know its mine fair and square and not given as part in some back room deal. I think that is only fair don't you? Now, now, Your Majesty, I have in the past answered said questions, and I shall do so again; #1: I have NEVER claimed that you over-use cliffhangers in any way. Over-use is, after all, a very different thing from mastery, and though I have oft claimed the latter, I have never claimed the former. I'll also mention that saying someone is the king of something is saying they are the best at it, not that they over-use it. #2: But LiS 26 was indeed the Mother of All Cliffhangers! I can cite at least TWO GA admins who proclaimed it's cliffhangery dominance, and of course many other readers too. Or have you forgotten the threats to your berries? #3: This was a loaded question; you use "worse". Shadowgod, no one is trying to say that your cliffhangers are bad, we are just trying to acknowledge your absolute mastery of the eeeevil cliffhanger! (and I'll mention LiS 26, again! ) #4... I agreed to that? Umm, when? I do recall saying that, if there was a vote, your title would surely be re-affirmed. And on your final point, you imply a shady backroom deal!?!?!? Nothing of the sort occurred! Now, bear in mind that not only was your title bestowed upon you by your readers after LiS 26, but it was also then confirmed by a special GA committee, and THEN confirmed by a vote in your forum!
Recommended Posts