Jump to content

Writing The Main Character - Uses Personal Experience Or Is Imagined?


Recommended Posts

I've been thinking about this a lot, it's a subject that's been debated and argued over. Can you write about a black guy if you are not yourself coloured? Can you write about a woman if you are male? Can you write about a gay man if you're a woman?

 

Well of course you can. If not, no one would write anything. However, I believe loads of writing incorporates experiences from the author's life, either direct or indirect. Things they have lived themselves or understand through stuff shared by friends. It therefore seems very difficult to write the protagonist as black, a woman, or gay man, unless that is who the author is. Very difficult, doesn't mean it can't be done, but I don't know how you would get right inside the main character's head. It risks being superficial or unrealistic.

 

How could I write about being a 13 year old boy if I had never been one? How could I write a gay sex scene if I had never had sex with a guy?

 

Remember here I'm talking about the main character in the story, the person the reader identifies with, the person we get to know the most about. I could write in a girlfriend giving birth, I could write how a dad feels when he holds his baby in his arms for the first time. But, I have to recognise my limitations, I have never done either, and I think it would always lack something. The giving birth scene would be more difficult than the father holding his new born baby. An author can project their emotions and adapt them, but there are limits, or don't you think so?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • Site Administrator

I think Gary said it perfectly. :)  To me, part of the fun of writing is putting myself in other people's heads.  I've written stories from the POV of obsessed stalkers, elves, alcoholic abusers, and gay men.  Am I any of those things?  No.  Was I successful in my portrayals?  I'd like to think so, based on reviews of my stories.  While I do add personal elements to my stories--things I've experienced, mannerisms of people I know or even myself, or places I've been--I don't write my characters based solely on those experiences.  I think my writing would be quite boring and limited if I did.  If I'm writing about something I have limited knowledge of, then I select editors and beta readers that have experience in those areas and trust them to tell me if I hit or miss the mark.  

 

There are authors on the site who have done an amazing job telling their personal stories, and they are some of the best on the site (i.e. It Started with Brianand Crosscurrents are two that come to mind).  But it's not necessary to include that level of personalization to write a good tale.  So to answer your question... no, I don't think there are limits.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment

I'd like to think that Gary and Val are right on the money here, but I can't really tell since I'm one of those who write people different from me regarding for instance sex. I would hope my readers would tell me if I was way off in my description of a guy. My outlook when writing a character is that they are human just like me. But I try to listen and learn. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment

I would like to add, apologies if I wasn't clear, I'm only talking here about writing main characters for real life stories.

 

So we can dismiss historical drama (no one has been a black slave), leave out SciFi, fantasy worlds, and vampires, they are all imaginary and the author can create anything they like.

 

I am asking the question with regard to writing the sorts of books, although works of fiction, they have characters that would exist here and now. The sort of stories, for example, where young gay adults are looking for role models and for characters they can relate to.

 

You don't need to look any further than here on the forum to see the questions youngsters ask, like does love at first sight happen.

 

There must be loads of very successful writers of both sexes writing tons of entertaining books that offer escapism.

 

To expand my thoughts: I do not believe, however much research I did or even talking to people about their experiences that, for example I could do 100% justice to a main character suffering PTS (Post Traumatic Stress). I could write it to a supporting character, get it, if I was that good, maybe 90% right, but never having been to war in Iraq or where ever, never actually having experienced it, I don't think I could write it like someone who had.

 

I hope that's clear, because I think the general idea that women can write gay men etc, has been agreed. Here I'm interested to know if some youngster was reading a real life account of being a gay young man written by a woman would it be only at best 90% accurate, or men writing women, you get what I mean. I'm not picking on any one section of the human race.

 

Just would be interested in peoples' opinions because it would impact my writing. Thanks :)

Link to comment
  • Site Administrator

The answer to that question depends on the author.  I don't feel like I need to draw on something I experienced in real life in order to write a believable main character.  I feel that some of my best stories feature main characters that are quite different from me in their personality and experiences.  Part of the fun of writing is exploring differing types of protagonists, IMO.  As far as your own writing, I think you answered your own question.  If you don't believe you are going to be successful writing something outside of your own experiences, then you won't be.  That doesn't mean you should abandon it, though.  Use the prompts to challenge your comfort zone and see how readers respond.  The only way to improve is by trying.  If you're 'only' 90% successful, then I would consider that a win.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment

I believe I understood exactly what you were asking, William. It's a question I've heard posed before. Your position is clear, so I'm not really sure of the purpose. The ability to convey is what's important here, and we fill in the gaps in personal experience with what we learn and know, or can learn through research, as observers. Just because you're a gay man doesn't mean you can write something that will help a young gay person's journey. It goes to intent and ability. Role models? We are, as I said, humans first. To infer one human could only get it ninety per cent right because of their gender is wrong in my opinion. Should young gay men only read what other gay men write about life? I think you can agree that's ridiculous. The distinction of it being a main character over a supporting character shouldn't matter either, in my opinion. They all have their important parts to play in any story. If we can't write what we have no personal experience with, such as PTSD, or being a slave(I don't agree with dismissing historical drama with regards to what you posted... it might suit you to do so, but I believe it applies), then we would be really limiting ourselves. Again, your purpose? For me, writing is a combination of many things, and yes, I do get what you are saying, but I disagree. I will return to empathy, and how we can put ourselves in other peoples' situations. Yes, there are different genders (maybe more than two :)  ), but we are all made up of the same stuff, and there are no limits to our capabilities as individuals. I don't dismiss generalities, but they can be dangerous things. If a writer desires to tackle a subject that might be difficult to them, and they have the ability, and the drive, it's been my experience they will succeed. I've seen it with my own eyes, and that's what I go on... cheers... Gary.... 

  • Like 4
Link to comment

Okay, I get what both of you are saying (above), I would just like to pick up on one point you made Headstall: "Should young gay men only read what other gay men write about life?"

 

I agree with you there, however, I believe that a young gay person would getter the best input on being gay from another gay person, not on life in general, but on life from the POV of a gay person. You can't give that insight if you are not gay, how can you? Somethings cannot be imagined they have to be experienced. You cannot imagine how to ride a bicycle or swim, you have to experience it to know how to do it. You can't imagine what it is like being gay, you have to have experienced it. Anything else is an approximation.

 

If you disagree write a reply, but after I would really like to get input from others (whether they agree or not), if you don't mind.

 

Now I'll shut up, but thank you for your own view it is good to get your opinions :)

Link to comment
  • Site Administrator

LOL... I believe you just told me you would like me to shut up... thank you for allowing me one more reply :)  . My opinion is that your view is narrow. For example, there are many straight people, women and men, who have lived through their friends' or relatives' gay experiences... and no, they haven't experienced the actual 'gay' sex act, but you can pretty much bet they understand slot A into slot B or C, and the ins and outs of oral sex. It's really not so different. And if you are referring to things like experiencing bigotry and fear... well, we don't hold the patent on that one. If you believe a woman or straight man doesn't understand homophobia, I think you're wrong. Many of us gay men lived lives pretending we were straight... do you think we didn't understand what 'being straight' entailed? Human journeys or relationships are not like riding bikes. You may dismiss the human element, and our huge similarities, because of gender, but I don't. Heartache is heartache. Persecution is persecution. Family issues and rejection doesn't just happen to gay people. And is our first love and the awakening of our sexuality so different a woman or straight man can't fathom it? I don't believe so, but you obviously do. I won't limit myself or others in any way.

 

"You can't give that insight if you are not gay, how can you? Somethings cannot be imagined they have to be experienced. You cannot imagine how to ride a bicycle or swim, you have to experience it to know how to do it. You can't imagine what it is like being gay, you have to have experienced it. Anything else is an approximation."

 

I will say one more thing with regards to your quote. Every thing we write is an approximation, unless it is about our exact selves. Every single person/character has a different journey, nuanced by many things. You can't lump us all together in that regard. Where you can lump us together, in my opinion, is in the certainty most of us experienced the same rush of emotions as we became teenagers, and our capacity to understand what others go through grew along with those. Are we all the same. No. But we're all people, and I choose to recognize our similarities over our differences. I don't agree with your message in the highlighted quote... if a person pays attention, and cares, I think they can give insights into a gender or sexuality not their own. That is just MY opinion. Cheers.

I wish there was a 'love' button for this. 

 

I'll just add that life without imagination would be very boring, indeed.  I can imagine myself flying a plane and learn the technical aspects online if I want to write about a pilot.  Doesn't mean I can go out and actually fly a plane, but I would hope to lend enough authenticity to the story to make it plausible.  A beta reader who's a pilot would tell me if I got it right or not, as would readers who are pilots.  Substitute whatever word you will for 'pilot' and the response is the same.  

 

What it boils down to is write what you like and are comfortable with.  If you are only comfortable writing about your own experiences, then do that.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment

I don't think there's anything else I can add to this discussion. But I wanted to reaffirm the points made by those who responded above. The only limits to our imagination are the limits we place on ourselves.

 

Through research and empathy, I believe we can convincingly write characters that are vastly different from us, be they gay, straight, men, women, etc. When writing, we can draw upon experiences other people have shared with us; if I accurately describe what the other person is feeling, how is that less genuine than when I'm describing what I'm feeling? 

 

I don't know how many times I've read something and then was surprised by the gender/sexual orientation of the author. The goal of every author should be to write believable stories with believable characters, regardless of who is doing the writing. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
  • Site Administrator

I like to point out that it's a flawed concept to focus only on one aspect of the character, whatever that might be as far as culture, skin color, sexuality, age, gender, etc... This is something I've noticed all too often with people who believe writing 'gay' romance must focus and create drama based just on that aspect of sexuality. That's too narrow. People are people, and an author is a person too. Different aspects of your personality/experiences/family etc... can come into play, and a lot of authors use themselves and those around them for inspiration. The rest is often made up with research. I find that the life of a gay man is no harder to research than the life of an astronaut, a chef, or a single parent or a gay astronaut, bisexual chef, or transsexual parent. For the most part, I've found that most readers find my characters believable, no matter who they are or what they do for a living, because I just focus on writing them as a person with all their individuality on display without harping on one thing to the exclusion of all else.

 

On the practical side, if you are writing something beyond your life experiences, try to get input from people who can relate to your character and their life. There is often 'insider' information you might not have that they can help with. Just don't let a fear of using the unknown keep you from trying something new.

  • Like 5
Link to comment

I suppose to be convincing in writing a main character from an orientation, sex, or culture other than your own you should develop sources for research. I write a Finn. I am not Finnish, but I do have a Finn who helps me culturally and linguistically at times. Somehow, I manage to convey him in a convincing way (I hope). I am gay and so is my character so I don't have to research that bit as much though I do have to immerse myself in Finnish Gay Culture which is quite different than American Gay Culture in a lot of ways.

 

It's been educational and very rewarding to do this. It is amazing what connections find you when you begin expressing yourself through the lens of another culture. Resources come to you and help you because they admire and believe in what you are trying to do. Your consciousness grows. So I actually recommend putting yourself in the shoes of someone other than yourself as a main character. You learn a lot of empathy that way and you can then grow as a writer and touch people on deeper levels.

Edited by MrM
  • Like 5
Link to comment

Thanks to everyone who expressed their opinion, and I will just add that a lot of people made some good points which made me look at things a little differently. I'm not 100% convinced, but that is a personal thing and perhaps it reflects my own lack of confidence. What I really appreciate here is being able to talk things over with you guys, and gals, and everyone :)

  • Like 5
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Our Privacy Policy can be found here: Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..