This is an excellent discussion, people! This is indeed a good community.
As the first time author in question, please let me say that, first, the story was published as part of the Secret Author contest, so no reviewer could have known it was my first one, and also, I was cheeky there, because till the author reveal, I did not have the "Author" attribute either, so people could not even have guessed that I even might have participated.
Going into a challenge, I was ready for feedback, also given the, let's say not uncontroversial, content. I am actually very pleased that it did so well! I was prepared for outrage.
The issue that threw me was that there was no further detail on feedback. I asked for details, and @Hero provided something I can work with. Thanks again!
Some time ago, I asked on the writer's blog what would make a good review. I think we should have this discussion. I must admit that Hero's observation of the "All or no stars" reviews is more or less correct. I am "guilty" of that as well. I rather do not give a "bad" review i.e. low stars, mostly because I read this site on the phone, and the commenting mechanism on the phone seems broken for me. Maybe I need to put some time aside for that like I do right now. Time, precious time... to where do you run off?
On the other hand, there is the aspect of the community. This is a great place, because one is not "ripped apart" for a first time effort by people who have authored successfully for umteen years. As stated by others before, not everyone wants to be come a professional author. I have no such plans, but I have (hopefully) indicated that I am interested in constructive feedback.
Also, feedback should distinguish between story content and crafting skill. Good stories can be badly written and vice versa.